Month: April 2024

Following up on last week’s NFL Pre-Draft rant, I said I would track the draft status of the 62 players I mentioned in my original posting.  The objective here is not to predict the NFL value of any of these draftees or non-draftees; that will not really be known for at least 2 years and maybe more.  The aim is much more limited than that:

• How close to the reality and finality of the NFL Draft can a TV viewer of college football come with his/her infrequent observations of college football playoffs?

Well, the data are in and shall be presented here.  I want to separate 2 players from the 62 players on my original list.  Two players came to me from friends who saw players and knew that I would not see them play – – and they also knew I would be doing an NFL Pre-Draft rant.  So, let me thank my correspondents and point out their record:

• One recommendation was Jordan Magee – LB Temple.  He was drafted by the Commanders in Round 5.
• The other recommendation was John Jiles – WR Western Florida (Division II).  He was undrafted but signed by the Giants as an undrafted free agent the day after the draft concluded.

My two correspondents have done quite well in their “spottings”.

I made comments about 60 players in this year’s NFL Draft.  Here are the data:

• Fifty-eight of my 60 players were drafted somewhere in the 7 rounds of the NFL Draft.
• One player – Jamree Kromah, DE (JMU) – was signed by the Bears as an undrafted free agent the day after the draft.
• One player – Porter Wilson, P – (Duke) – was invited to the Packers minicamp as an opportunity to compete for a roster spot with the Packers.

So, what is the take away here?  The take-away is NOT that I am the moral equivalent of an NFL scout nor is it that NFL teams are spending way too much money on scouting when they could just hire a few guys to watch a lot of games on TV from their couches.  More reasonably:

• I was able to spot potential NFL players in and among college players because I rarely had any rooting interest in the games I was watching – AND –
• I don’t “force myself” to find at least one prospect in every game I watch.

One last comment about the draft …  Everyone here knows that I like to have fun with players’ names.  The Jacksonville Jaguars team name is alliterative; and, in the draft, the Jags took two players similarly alliterative:

• Jarrian Jones (Round 3)
• Jordan Jefferson (Round 4)

Three other NFL teams are similarly alliterative but neither the Buffalo Bills nor the Seattle Seahawks nor the Tennessee Titans drafted players with similar alliterations.  I wonder if the Jags are onto something here…?

Moving on …  In other football-related news, Reggie Bush got his Heisman Trophy back.  He won the award in his college days, but it was “revoked” after an NCAA investigation determined that his family had received “improper benefits”.  The folks who thought that the punishment there was out of proportion with the “crime” are happy with this outcome.

I am not one to praise – or even defend – the NCAA “investigators”; On the whole, they are a feckless entity.  However, in this case I think everyone got it right.

• At the time of the infraction in 2005 – – the “improper benefits” – – it was clearly and obviously against the rules of the NCAA, and it deserved to be sanctioned.
• In the current incarnation of college sports – – with NIL deals in abundance – – everything involved in the “Reggie Bush Matter” seems like small potatoes.

In terms of this particular matter, things have been made right and now the door is open for others to try to reclaim some sort of glory that was denied them in the past because of “different rules” today.

• Should the Fab Five get an apology for taking money from a booster who had already been banned by the NCAA as a rulebreaker?
• Should the family of Jerry Tarkanian get an apology because the NCAA thought something evil might come from a photo of one of Tark’s players in a hot tub with a guy whose moniker was “The Fixer”?

Terelle Pryor was suspended from the Ohio State team and then banned from contacting anyone in the program allegedly for autographing memorabilia for a booster.  In 2024, that sort of thing is an entry on the calendar for dozens of college football players.  There is no point in lifting that suspension; Terrelle Pryor is not about to return to Ohio State and compete for the starting QB position in 2024.

The Reggie Bush situation has been closed; it feels right in 2024 – – but it really does not set much of a precedent for “remedies” in prior college football scandals.

Finally, the mention of scandals today suggests that I close with these words from the playwright, Moliere:

“It is the public scandal that offends; to sin in secret is no sin at all.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

Two days ago, I did my “Annual Pre-Draft Analysis” which drew a comment from a reader who goes by “TenaciousP” asking:

“Are you brave enough to go back, chronicle previous draft analysis, and grade yourself on your perspicacity?”

That is way more work than I am willing to undertake but his comment sparked the basis for today’s rant. I will see to what degree the scouts and the teams who hire those scouts corroborate or contradict my conclusions based on what I saw on TV.  So, here are data from my rant and from last night’s first round of the NFL Draft:

• Twenty-two of the thirty-two players selected last night (69%) were on my list. 
• I had sixty-two players on my list and twenty-two of them (35%) went in the first round.

That second data point is shaded to the negative just a bit because on my list were five Running Backs, three Safeties, two Punters and a Kicker.  No players in those positions were taken in Round 1.  I will leave the “assignment of a grade” to TenaciousP here rather than grade myself.  [Aside:  I happen to know that TenaciousP was a high school teacher at some point prior to his retirement; so, he is completely competent to make such a judgment.]

I will also try to do the following next Monday:

• I will try to track the draft fate of all sixty-two players on my list to see how many actually get drafted by an NFL team.  That was the point of my preparing my list in the first place.

Remember that even first round picks have only a 50% chance of sticking with the team that drafted them beyond a “first contract’.  I only want to compare my list of draft candidates to the actual draft results to see how my eyeballs agree with the eyeballs and other data sources available to NFL teams.  To be continued …

I want to make 7 comments about specific first round selections last night:

1. The Falcons’ selection of Michael Penix, Jr. implies to me that the Falcons intend only to keep Kirk Cousins as their QB for the two years in which his salary is guaranteed and then they will transition to Penix.  If that is not their thinking, then they drafted Penix to use him as “trading goods” with a “QB-deficient team” later.
2. The Chiefs’ offense last year was less efficient than it had been in some previous seasons – – even though the Chiefs won the Super Bowl last year.  What they did not have was a guy who could “take the top off the defense” reliably.  So, last night they drafted a guy – – Xavier Worthy – – who merely ran the fastest 40-yard time in the history of the NFL Combine.  Wow…
3. I think Caleb Williams (Bears) and JJ McCarthy (Vikes) are walking into the best “success environments” for the QBs taken in the first round given the surrounding elements for those two QBs.  I still think Jayden Daniels will be as good or better than either Williams or McCarthy in the long run, but Daniels’ teammates in 2024 will not be as strong as those other two rookie QBs.
4. In contrast, I think Drake Maye and Bo Nix are walking into the worst “success environments” for 2024.  Neither the Pats nor the Broncos are strong at the skill positions meaning the new QBs will need to be grinders – – and that is a trait that normally does not come early in a QBs career if it ever comes at all.
5. I said earlier this week that Brock Bowers was a “can’t miss prospect”.  Barring injury, I stand by that statement.  Having said that, I am surprised that the Raiders took him with the 13^th pick last night because the Raiders already have a competent tight end – – Michael Mayer – – whom they drafted just a year ago.
6. I have a similar quizzical reaction to the Niners’ selection of a WR – – Ricky Pearsall (Florida) – – at #31.  The Niners’ pass catchers seem to be competent and plentiful.  Strange …
7. The Seahawks took Byron Murphy (DT-Texas) with the 16^th pick.  The ESPN commentators said he was the best interior defensive lineman in the draft.  I saw Texas play at least twice and probably four times last year and I did not have any notes on Murphy – – but I did have notes on one of his defensive linemates, T’Vondre Sweat, who was not drafted in Round 1.  C’est la guerre…

Switching gears …  Yesterday I read that Peyton Manning’s production company – – Omaha Productions – – has reached an agreement with Bill Belichick to have Coach Belichick be a “semi-regular contributor” to the Monday Night ManningCast on ESPN.  Earlier this week, ESPN and Omaha Productions reached an agreement to extend the ManningCast alternate telecasts for “a series of Monday Night Football telecasts” each year through 2034.  I suspect that Belichick will add to the program.

Finally, I’ll close today with an observation by Sir Winston Churchill that obliquely applies to making selections in the NFL Draft:

“Success is stumbling from failure to failure with no loss of enthusiasm.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

Yesterday was devoted to a rendering of my notes from last fall related to the NFL Draft that will begin this evening.  Today, I want to begin with two teams in the Draft in an interesting situation.  Here is what I think is interesting:

The Broncos (drafting 12^th in Round 1) and the Raiders (drafting #13 in Round 1) both appear to need a QB.

The teams are in the same division – – and the same division with Justin Herbert and Patrick Mahomes.

After the Round 1 pick, the Broncos do not pick again until #76 in Round 3.

After the Round 1 pick, the Raiders do not pick again until #44 in Round 2.

Here is why I say these teams need a QB.

• Broncos’ depth chart at QB this morning is:
  • • Jarrett Stidham
    • Zach Wilson
    • Ben DiNucci
• Raiders’ depth chart at QB this morning is:
  • • Aiden O’Connell
    • Gardner Minshew
    • Anthony Brown, Jr.

If either the Broncos or the Raiders identifies one of those six QBs as their “franchise QB”, I would have to say that the best they could do was to pick the tallest dwarf…

            I do not mean to imply that those two teams only need a QB to become Super Bowl contenders, but they do need an upgrade at the position, and they are a bit low in the first round to have a realistic shot at one of the “top-ranked QBs” for this year.  Yesterday, I listed 7 QBs that I saw who might become decent – – or better than that – – at the QB position in the NFL.  So how will all of this unfold?

• If either the Broncos or the Raiders try to trade-up into a prime drafting slot, I will suspect that the team trading-down will exact a heavy price.
• If the Broncos or Raiders stay where they are and can only pick from the remnants of the QB candidates, do they draft for other team needs and wait until next year?
• If there is only one QB left on the board at Pick #10 that is attractive to both the Broncos and the Raiders, do they get into a bidding war with the Jets at #10 for the chance to move up?

Here is how I see the teams ahead of the Broncos and Raiders in terms of needing/wanting a young QB:

• Four teams clearly need a young QB – – Bears, Commanders, Pats, Vikes
• Two teams might want a young QB – – Giants, Titans.

I plan to watch tonight’s Draft coverage because I think there could be some interesting movement/trading among the teams.  I will also be interested to see how many of the players I identified yesterday get taken in Round 1 (maybe a half-dozen?) and over the weekend I will check to see how many get drafted at all.

Moving on …  I mentioned here before that Reggie Jackson went to high school at one of my high school’s rivals and that he was a terror in at least two sports – – football and baseball.  Obviously, his presence in the Baseball Hall of Fame corroborates his prowess on the diamond.  I ran across some high school stats for Joe Mauer who will enter the Hall of Fame as a first-ballot inductee this summer:

• In his senior year, Mauer’s batting average was .605.
• In his entire high school career, his batting average was over .500 every year.
• His career high school batting average was .557.
• In high school he had 222 at-bats; he hit 43 home runs and struck out 1 time.

Joe Mauer was obviously a terror in high school baseball and his career could easily have been the stuff of novels.

• He was born and raised in St. Paul, Minnesota.
• He was drafted by the hometown Twins.
• He played his entire 15-year MLB career with the hometown Twins.
• And he made it to the Hall of Fame.
• Jack Armstrong – – the All-American Boy – – can welcome Joe Mauer to the table.

Finally, apropos of nothing, I’ll close today with this observation by Ambrose Bierce:

“Peace, n.  In international affairs, a period of cheating between two periods of fighting.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

I got an email from a friend/reader late last week asking a simple question:

“Why don’t you identify [MLB] managers who are on a hot seat?  You do that for the NFL and sometimes for college football coaches.”

My original answer to the question was very simple; somehow, it had never occurred to me to do so.  I resolved to spend a little time over the weekend compiling such a list for this morning.  In so doing, I came to realize that my list had two distinct categories:

1. Managers of teams with high expectations which might underachieve those expectations.
2. Managers of BAD teams who could not win with any manager on the job.

In the first category above, I think there are two managers whose seats are cool as can be as of this morning but could become very hot if their teams falter:

1. Aaron Boone (Yankees):  The Yankees are always expected to win and to compete for World Series Championships.  The last time the Yankees won the Series was in 2009 and they have not been back to the Series since then.  Boone has been the manager since 2018 so the pressure to win with a loaded roster is real.  The Yankees are off to a hot start at 15-7; at this pace they project to win 110 games this year – – which is not realistic.  But in 2023, the Yankees only won 82 games and Boone needs to improve significantly over that number.
2. Dave Roberts (Dodgers):  In his 8-year tenure with the team, Roberts has had the Dodgers in the playoffs every year and the Dodgers won a World Series in that timespan.  In the last 4 full seasons – – ignoring the truncated 2020 season – – the Dodgers have won 100 or more games.  However, this winter the Dodgers added Tyler Glasnow, Shohei Ohtani and Yoshinobu Yamamoto to that team that routinely wins 100 games or more in a season.  As of this morning, the Dodgers’ record is 13-11 which projects to 88 wins for the season – – which is also not a realistic outcome.  But if it comes to pass …

The second category of managers on a hot seat are the guys in charge of bad baseball teams and someone must be “held accountable” for such badness and the accountability is not going to extend to the owner’s box or even to the GM in most cases.  So here are three managers whose teams are probably going to be bad enough to put the manager’s job in jeopardy:

1. Bud Black (Rockies):  The Rockies lost 103 games last year; they are 5-17 so far this year.  ‘Nuff said…
2. Pedro Grifol (White Sox):  The team lost 101 games in 2023 and have lost 18 of their first 21 games so far in 2024.  The Sox have averaged only 2.1 runs scored per game in 2024 indicating that recovery from such a disastrous start to the season is unlikely.
3. Mark Kotsay (A’s):  In the two years prior to this one, the A’s have lost 102 games and then 112 games on Kotsay’s watch.  Ignore the fact that the owner does not spend nearly enough to field a competitive team; the owner will not fire himself.  Another triple-digits in the loss column in 2024 could see Kotsay out of a job.

And speaking of the Oakland A’s and their less-than-wonderful ownership, the team has apparently figured out what it will do for a home field after this season is over and its lease to play in the Oakland Coliseum – or whatever they are calling it this month – expires.  The team intends to move to Las Vegas in 2028.  I say “intends to move” because there is no stadium for it there and work has not yet begun on constructing one.  But for the moment, I will try to keep a good thought; the team announced that it will play its home games between 2025 and 2027 in Sacramento.

The stadium there – – Sutter Health Park – – is the home field for the minor league Sacramento River Cats meaning that the two teams will need to interleave their schedules for the summer months.  The groundskeeping crew for the stadium will certainly earn their pay over the next few years as the stadium will see action for 81 A’s home games plus 75 River Cats’ home games.  The stadium capacity is listed as 14,000 but there should be an asterisk on that number because it includes “lawn seating” in the outfield.  [Aside:  To be fair, many minor league stadiums include that feature.]  As is to be expected, the A’s are not drawing flies in Oakland this season.  In fact, the average attendance for the A’s in 13 home games this year is a measly 6,244 diehard fans.  Last year, the A’s averaged a meager 10,672 fans per game meaning that for last year and so far this year, the attendance in Oakland would fit nicely into the minor league facility in Sacramento.

Finally, since today has been about baseball, let me close with this observation by Yogi Berra on the occasion of Joe DiMaggio’s marriage to Marilyn Monroe:

“I don’t know if it’s good for baseball, but it beats the hell out of rooming with Phil Rizzuto.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

I have noted here before that I enjoy watching the “Manningcast” for Monday Night Football events.  When Peyton and Eli have a “football guest” and/or when Peyton and Eli are providing commentary on their own, I think that is a different and an interesting way to watch a football game.  I admit that some of their guests do not add to my enjoyment, but ESPN gives me the Joe Buck/Troy Aikman telecast as an easy remedy for no-account guests.

So, I was happy to read last week that ESPN and Peyton Manning’s production company, Omaha Productions, had reached an agreement to extend the “Manningcasts” through 2034.  There were 10 “Manningcasts” last year and the program won an Emmy in 2022 for “Outstanding Live Sports Series.  ESPN has television rights to more than 10 games including playoff games, but I did not find any reporting on the new contract as it applies to the number of “Manningcasts” to be aired per season.  Not being one to look a gift horse in the mouth, I will simply be happy to know that at least some of the alternative broadcasts will be available over the next 10 seasons.

Moving on …  The NBA playoffs have begun; it is now safe and enjoyable to watch whatever NBA game might appear on your TV screen.  The reason I say that is the clearly observable fact that all the players take all these games seriously; that is an element of competition that is clearly absent in far too many regular season NBA games.  That is the good news for the NBA as it is now in a position to take over the spotlight of the sports world for the next couple of months.

The bad news for the NBA is that there is another gambling scandal – – and it must be a lot more than rumors/allegations.  The NBA announced a lifetime ban for Toronto Raptors’ forward, Jontay Porter, based on:

“… disclosing confidential information to sports bettors, limiting his own participation in one or more games for betting purposes and betting on NBA games.”

I think we can all agree that those behaviors represent a trifecta of wrongdoing on the part of Jontay Porter.  The fact that there has not been an outcry of protest from the NBPA speaks directly to the quality of the evidence available.  Here is a link to an excellent report at CBSSports.com that lays out the findings of an NBA investigation and how that investigation began.

Note that once again the existence of legalized sports gambling plays a dual role in this mess.

1. The fact that sports wagering is so widespread and so easily available to just about anyone and everyone provides the means to put temptation in front of athletes and officials.
2. The fact that legalized sports betting enterprises have a vested interest in not being scammed makes those entities efficient and effective sentries on the lookout for folks who might be using “improper means” to beat the books.

This is the second “betting scandal” for the NBA in the last 20 years; I need not go into the details of the Tim Donaghy mess again; Wikipedia can do that for you if you need your memory refreshed.  And in that case like the current matter, the NBA is not the organization/entity that discovered the wrongdoing.  Back then it was the FBI who ran across information that the FBI then informed the NBA about that led to the discovery that an official was betting on games including ones that he would be officiating.

Two scandals in 20 years might be written off as sufficiently infrequent as to be only of minor concern.  I think that would be a bad stance for the NBA to assume; I think the much more important lesson for Adam Silver and his cohorts to learn here is that their “investigative and enforcement” people need to step up their game significantly.

Next up …  Recall after the Spanish Women’s Soccer Team won the Women’s World Cup a couple of years ago, the head of the Spanish Soccer Federation, Luis Rubiales, ran onto the pitch and kissed one of the players, Jenni Hermoso, on the lips.  He says it was part of the excitement of the moment’; she says it was a sexual assault because it was unwanted and uninvited. Rubiales was forced to resign his position with the Spanish Soccer Federation and is now facing legal charges in the matter.

According to a BBC report, a Spanish prosecutor has brought charges against Rubiales of one count of sexual assault and one count of coercion because of that encounter.  According to that report, the sexual assault charge would levy a 1-year prison sentence on Rubiales and the coercion charge would being an 18-month sentence according to Spanish Law.  I need to tread lightly here …

• What Rubiales did was inappropriate.  There needs to be some degree of sanction for his improper and inexcusable behavior.
• Court documents allege that other Spanish Soccer officials tried to convince Ms. Hermoso to say that the kiss was unexpected but nothing more than that.  If those allegations are correct, those officials are at least as guilty of inappropriate behavior as is Rubiales.
• And having said all that, I am not convinced that a kiss is sexual assault unless having me believe that it is the same thing as fondling or rape is the intent of these charges – – and I hope that is not the case because that would trivialize to some degree things I believe are actual sexual assaults which are far worse than an unwarranted kiss.

I don’t know what an ideal outcome might be in this matter.  Rubiales did something wrong and needs to atone for it and pay for it.  I do not think he should go to jail for two-and-a-half years, nor do I think he should be considered to reside in the same category as rapists.  I am glad I am not the judge in this matter.

Finally, consider this observation by my favorite curmudgeon, H. L. Mencken:

“Every man is thoroughly happy twice in his life: just after he has met his first love and just after he has left his last one.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

John Sterling has been the radio play-by-play voice of the Yankees on WFAN in NYC for about the last 35 years; so, it was a surprise to read that he was going into retirement right now, in the middle of a Yankees’ season.  One report cited “health reasons” for retirement and that led me to hope that whatever those reasons are they were not as dire as the tone of that revelation was.

I was anything but a regular listener to John Sterling who called Yankees’ games with Suzyn Waldman, but I would listen to him infrequently when driving in my car in the nighttime radio range of WFAN.  Sterling was hardly a great radio announcer because – – at least I thought – – he spent way too much of his time and attention on coming up with “cutesy phraseology” to apply to the game.  One such instance sticks out in my mind:

• Yankees were trailing late in a game and Hideki Matsui hit a 3-run homerun to put the Yankees in the lead.  Obviously, this called for enthusiasm from the Yankees’ broadcast team, but I thought it was a tad over the top to hear Sterling yelling that this was a “thrilla by Godzilla”.

WFAN will replace Sterling with two announcers – – Justin Shackil and Emmanuel Berbari – – neither of whom I have ever heard do anything on a radio.  From what I have read, Suzyn Waldman will continue to be part of the broadcast team at least for the rest of the 2024 season.

Moving on …  The NCAA has leveled penalties/sanctions on the Michigan football program for recruiting violations by the coaches – – including former head coach Jim Harbaugh – – for impermissible contacts with recruits during a COVID recruiting standdown.  The NCAA considers these violations to be at the highest level of miscreant behavior and they claim that Coach Harbaugh was uncooperative with whatever investigation the NCAA used to accumulate facts in this matter.

The sanctions include 3 years of probation and scholarship forfeitures in those three seasons.  The part of the story that I found amusingly confounding was a statement issued by Jim Harbaugh’s lawyer who represented him to the NCAA in this matter.  Said the attorney in an interview with ESPN:

“I filed a lengthy response (to the NCAA’s allegations) on behalf of Coach Harbaugh which unfortunately has not been made public and will probably never see the light of day.  That (filing) concluded Coach Harbaugh’s participation in the case.”

That sure makes it sound as if Coach Harbaugh is being railroaded here and may even be labeled as a victim in all of this – – until you ask yourself a simple question:

• If there is probative evidence in that filing that went to the NCAA regarding Michigan’s and Harbaugh’s innocence, what is preventing the lawyer- – with the consent of Jim Harbaugh of course – – from releasing it to the public to make sure that it sees the “light of day”?

I am not a fan of the Inspector Clouseau acolytes who conduct NCAA investigations, but the complaint by Harbaugh’s lawyer along with his lack of action to show the public how innocent his client is makes me think the NCAA may have gotten one right this time around.  The Bottom Line is this:

• Jim Harbaugh now coaches in the NFL where he will reportedly make $16M per year.
• The NCAA can huff-and-puff/fuss-and-fume all it wants; Jim Harbaugh is going to be OK.

Next up …  Recall that the Opening Ceremony for the Paris Olympics later this year is going to be “different”.  Instead of athletes from the various nations parading in a stadium before the hosts and the assembled IOC pooh-bahs, the plan is to have the Opening Ceremony take place on barges floating down the Seine through the city of Paris.  With more than 10,000 athletes involved from 206 countries – – some of which might be difficult to find on a map – – that was always going to be a logistical challenge.  But the organizers had a couple of years to plan all that out and assemble the physical resources needed to pull it off; so, why not give it a go?

Well, now French security folks have suggested that there might be “security concerns” associated with parading all those athletes from wherever down the river in front of what was estimated to be 600,000 spectators who might be civic minded – – or not.  The security folks succeeded in creating crowd limits that would almost cut the original estimates in half, but still there is plenty of room for sociopathic individuals to find some degree of anonymity in a crown of about 300,000 souls at least 30% of whom have probably been imbibing as they waited for and watched the parade of barges.

The attack on the concert in Russia for which ISIS claimed responsibility caused the French authorities to pay more heed to security issues.  President Macron went so far as to say that the whole Opening Ceremony could be restaged in Stade de France if the security threat is deemed to be too high in the days/weeks leading up to the Games.

[Aside:  Adding to the security issues is the fact that 120 heads of state have declared that they plan to attend these Opening Ceremonies in addition to their athletic delegation.]

The idea of a totally different way to conduct the Opening Ceremony for a set of Olympic Games is appealing when one first hears about it.  But in these days of violent terrorist attacks seemingly anywhere and everywhere, you have to picture athletes from all those countries as sitting ducks on barges that might be able to move up to 3 miles per hour.  There is a potential for this to become a shooting gallery where the victims bleed in stead of merely being knocked over.

Finally, for no good reason at all, let me close today with these words from Charles Barkley:

“Curling is not a sport.  I called my grandmother and told her she could win a gold medal because they have dusting in the Olympics now.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

Presumably, everyone has their tax returns completed and in the mail as of last night.  And so, without further distraction or anxiety, let me continue my commentary on things that went down while I was on hiatus…

I have mentioned before that I have seen every final game in the NCAA basketball tournament on TV since 1954; even though my long-suffering wife and I were on travel this year, I kept that streak intact; it now stands at 70 consecutive years.  Congratulations to the UConn Huskies for their suffocating victory over Purdue by 15 points in the final game last week.  Purdue was a dominant team all season long with a powerful inside offensive game (Zach Edey) and a highly efficient outside offensive game (ranked 2^nd in the country in the regular season).  UConn put on a defensive clinic taking away the outside offense; in that 40-minute game, the Boilermakers were only able to attempt 7 three-point shots and were only able to make 1 three-point shot.

I enjoy watching UConn play; five players play together; it is not five separate games of one-on-one.  I admire Dan Hurley as a coach here because he gets this type of play from his team in the era of “Hey-Look-At-Me basketball” which is the style that is predominant around the country.  He says that he learned his coaching techniques from his father who was legendary as a high school coach at St. Anthony’s in New Jersey.  The UConn players are very good on offense based on their talents; what Hurley has done here is to get them to play hard and to play effectively on defense creating this dynamic:

• Opponents have to work hard to get good/open shots – – and then – – UConn comes down the court and runs efficient offense that gets good/open shots most of the time.

That is bad news for UConn opponents…

Moving on – but staying with college basketball.  John Calipari and the University of Kentucky have parted company.  Calipari resigned at UK and signed a 5-year contract with Arkansas just after March Madness ended.  He had been at Kentucky ever since the school fired Billy Gillispie (remember him?) when the Wildcats failed to make the NCAA Tournament after 17 consecutive trips to March Madness.  Kentucky certainly belongs in any conversation about the bluebloods of college basketball, but the expectations of the fanbase there are quite unrealistic.  It is almost as if they believe that Kentucky should have a slot in the Final Four each year as its birth right.

Calipari’s coaching vision is to play the “one-and-done” game by recruiting top shelf high school players who are only in college because they are not allowed to play in the NBA by dint of the CBA between the league and the players’ union.  Most of those players are extremely gifted with physical talents but Kentucky does not win lots of championships that way because:

• Those players are 19 years old at most and they often have to play against opponents who are 23 or 24 years old.  Physical maturity matters; that is why many one-and-done lottery picks in the NBA take a couple of years to have any real impact on the NBA game.
• Those players know they are not into Kentucky basketball for the long run.  They appear to resist hard coaching, and they certainly do not play defense with the intensity or the dedication of teams like UConn.

Consider these data compiled over the 16 seasons that John Calipari was the head coach at Kentucky:

• In those 16 seasons, Calipari recruited 52 players who went on to be first-round picks by NBA teams – – and yet – –
• The school won exactly 1 NCAA championship.  That is the same number of championships won by Joe B. Hall, Rick Pitino and Tubby Smith.

Mark Pope – late of the BYU basketball program – has been hired to replace Calipari at Kentucky.  I hope his teams do well starting in November 2024 because he is probably on a much shorter leash with the fanbase there than he realizes at this point.

Switching gears …  I would be remiss if I did not point out that the women’s tournament this year was historic.  For the first time ever, the women’s final game out drew the men’s final game on TV.  Surely, the celebrity factor that Caitlin Clark brought to the Iowa games and the undefeated status of Dawn Staley’s South Carolina team generated tons of interest in those tournament games.  Presumably, some of that interest will carry over to next year – – perhaps most of it?

And another thing …  When we got home last week, I spent some time watching The Masters on Friday.  Look, I am not a big “golf guy” but I usually check out some of the coverage of the majors.  The coverage last Friday was not for The Masters; it was for Tiger Woods.  He was not really in contention although he did “make the cut” but I saw him on camera more than any three or five other players combined.  [Aside:  Woods did make the cut and then proceeded to shoot 82 followed by 77 to finish 100^th in the field – – 27 strokes behind the winner, Scottie Scheffler.]

When Tiger Woods was clearly the best golfer on the planet, that level of coverage was excessive; but at least, there was a basis for the excess.  Tiger Woods is no longer anywhere near that status.  Maybe it’s because I am not a ‘golf guy”, but the constant and fawning coverage of Woods is a turn-off for me; I want to see and follow the guys who are vying for the lead not the guys scrambling to be allowed to play on Saturday and Sunday.

Finally, since much of today dealt with college basketball happenings, let me close with these words from Al McGuire:

“Winning is overemphasized.  The only time it is really important is in surgery and war.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………