The Sports Curmudgeon

Living in the DC area, one gets used to the infamous “Friday afternoon news dump” where the White House and/or the Congress blurts out a news item near the close of business on Friday in the hopes that lots of people will have gone into “weekend mode” at the time such that the controversy associated with the news is muted somewhat.  There was a news dump last Friday – – and it was different from most others because it involved sports.  The President of the United States signed an Executive Order described as being of “urgent national action to save college sports.”

I agree that college sports have become much more than “messy” over the last couple of years and that the NCAA is still feckless and useless in whatever it does to try to regularize what goes on there.  However, I never envisioned an Executive Order on the subject.  And yet, here we are …

Here are some of the features in the Executive Order:

• Eligibility for intercollegiate athletics will be limited to 5 years.  I like that provision; given all the waivers and set asides that have come into existence, some players are in their seventh and eighth year of “college sports”.
• The NIL collectives will come under Federal regulation.  Let me just say that “Federal regulation” is not universally successful nor productive; so, let me wait and see what that devolves to before I like it or dismiss it.
• Reinstatement of the “one-transfer rule” without sitting out a season.  I like that idea because it should limit the player being on five different teams in his “college” career.
• Grad-student transfers can be added on to a career if the player has completed a 4-year degree.  The NCAA should love that loophole because it will allow them to return to their glory days of the “student-athlete”.
• Colleges are to be “required” to fund Olympic sports and women’s sports.  That is clearly easier said than done, but I am not sure anyone is going to go on record in opposition to that requirement.

And the enforcement mechanism for failure to comply with this Order and/or relevant NCAA rules that are aligned with this order is an economic mechanism.  According to the Executive Order, the Feds can – – and presumably will – – “review federal government grants and contracts with schools” with an eye to cutting those funding sources if schools are not in compliance with the Executive Order.

So, having had a weekend to think about all this, here are a few first reactions:

• The schools, conferences and the NCAA should be happy to have this legal instrument in place as a starting point.
• I will be surprised if more than a month goes by without a legal challenge to the Executive Order brought by advocates for the players.
• This Executive Order might stir a few Congressthings out of their hibernation state and begin a process to codify something logical into law.  Yes, I recognize that I just used “Congress” and “logical” in the same sentence.  Hope springs eternal …

There will be public reaction to this Executive Order having exactly nothing to do with the content of the order and/or the possible benefits that might accrue to collegiate sports.  The fact is that the US is so politically divided today that the signature at the bottom of the Executive Order will frame the “debate” for too many folks:

• Option A:  If President Trump thinks this is the right way for college sports to exist in the US, then it must be the single best idea ever to spring into a human cranium.
• Option B:  If President Trump thinks this is the right way for college sports to exist in the US, then it must be corrupt, immoral and evil at its core and it must be expunged from human existence.

            And of course, the idea of an “Option C” where the Executive Order serves as the starting point for a set of reasoned negotiations to try to make things better becomes impossible due to the volume of the cries from proponents of both Options A and B above.  The Executive Order does not go into effect until August 2026; there is time for negotiation; there is time for Congress to find a way to agree on something that ought to be apolitical; there is time to ponder a new foundation for college sports in the US.  I wish I were more optimistic about the potential for the use of the time between now and August to be constructive.

Finally, this observation by Malcom X seems to be a good way to close out today’s rant:

“You’re not supposed to be so blind with patriotism that you can’t face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who does it or who says it.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

It’s time to clean up my clipboard, today.  None of the topics today are important but a couple are interesting.  The first one is the landing of Kirk Cousins in Las Vegas supposedly as the mentor for Fernando Mendoza who is expected to be the Raiders’ overall #1 pick in the Draft in a couple of weeks.  If the Raiders show patience and use Cousins as their QB for awhile and allow some sort of “mentoring relationship” to evolve, this could be a good deal for the team.  The only guaranteed money in the deal is reported to be $20M which is at the low end of “starting QB money”.

Kirk Cousins has been in the right place at the right time in his career.  His record labels him as “more than a journeyman” but “not a star” as a QB.  Notwithstanding that overall assessment, Spotrac.com says that Kirk Cousins has hauled in $321,692,254 in career earnings – – not counting the upcoming $20M from the Raiders.

Next on the odds and ends list …  The Cleveland Browns are in the process of building a new stadium that will be different from other NFL venues.  The bottom level of the facility will be 80 feet below ground level and the structure will stick out of the ground by 221 feet.  It is an indoor stadium which means the league will put a Super Bowl there once it is up and running and all the bugs have been worked out.

The cost is estimated to be $2.4B and the opening date is projected to be Week 1 of the 2029 regular season.  The facility is not in Cleveland proper; it is in a suburb of Cleveland called Brook Park about 20 miles from the current home field for the Browns.  The fact that it was outside the city limits was the source of legal and legislative strife that must have finally been resolved.  The new site cannot be too inconvenient for Clevelanders since it is adjacent to Cleveland’s airport.

It is not unusual for NFL teams to play home games in geographical places that do not match their common place names e.g.:

• Giants and Jets play in suburban NYC – – actually in NJ
• Rams play in Inglewood, CA
• Bills play in Orchard Park, NY
• Commanders play in Landover, MD – – for a while known as Raljon, MD
• Cowboys play in Arlington, TX
• Niners play in Santa Clara, CA – – an exurb of SF

            Moving on …  The NFL announced a deviation from tradition for the 2026 regular season schedule.  Normally, the regular season opens with the Super Bowl champ playing a home game on the Thursday after Labor Day.  Not so next season.  The NFL has scheduled a regular season game in Week 1 to be played in Melbourne, Australia and due to significant time zone issues, that game will happen on Thursday night here in the US.  [Aside:  The teams will kick off at 10:30 AM on Friday in Australian time.].  So, to minimize the deviation from tradition, the Seahawks will play the first game of the regular season at home on the Wednesday after Labor Day in 2026.

Not only will that game in Melbourne be the first regular season NFL game in Australia, but I think it is a strange choice of games by the league.  The Australia game will be the Niners versus the Rams.  I am not overly surprised that the league put good teams on the schedule there; as the saying goes, you never get a second chance to make a first impression.  However, the Rams/Niners is a major rivalry in the NFL, and I am surprised that a game that would mean a lot to both fan bases will be taking place – figuratively – on the other side of the Earth.

Another tidbit …  The NY Post reported that Puka Nacua was allegedly involved in a drunken incident back on New Year’s Eve where he bit a woman.  In addition to the “bitee” filing a lawsuit against Nacua, she also sought a restraining order against him.  Naturally, his attorney downplayed the incident and also reported that Nacua has been in a holistic rehab facility for several weeks seeking to make himself a better person.

Obviously, I have no knowledge of the alleged incident, but I would offer the holistic rehabilitators this advice:

• Put Nacua in contact with any three random kindergarten teachers who have experience in convincing children not to bite the kid sitting next to them.  He’ll become a better person for it.

Finally, this from physicist Isaac Azimov:

“People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

Some days, these rants write themselves.  The topics are obvious; my slant is clear; I have links to necessary data to support my assertions.  This is not one of those days; this is a new – – at least for me – – way for a rant to write itself.  For all practical purposes, I will turn today’s offering over to “the reader in Houston”.

You may recall that he previously told me that Mattress Mack’s promotional bet for March Madness this year would be on the final Four team closest to Houston, TX. If that happens, anyone who bought an expensive mattress from him during the promotion period would get a full refund.  Here is the update:

“As I previously wrote you, Mattress Mack is betting on the team closest to Houston of the Final Four for his annual NCAA mattress giveaway. Originally, his hope was that UH or another Texas team would make the Final Four. However, since no Texas team made it to the Final Four, he had to go out of state.

“Of the Final Four teams (Arizona, Michigan, Illinois, and UConn), I thought Arizona (+180) was closest to Houston, but upon further Google Map review, it turns out U. of Illinois (+470) is about 120 miles closer to here than UA.

“Based on Mack’s recent gambling history, if I was wagering, I would take UConn (ATS or SU) vs. Illinois on Saturday.”

Next  up …  You may recall that yesterday, I closed with a Mark Twain quip about April Fool’s Day.  I do not watch Jeopardy but “the reader in Houston” did last night.  That generated this email that arrived this morning:

“Final Jeopardy – Subject – The Calendar: Mark Twain wrote the quip that on this day of the year, ‘we are reminded of what we are on the other 364’.

“That was today’s ‘Final Jeopardy’.  One of the contestants who was way ahead with $58,800, bet $44,200, but wrote, ‘What is Labor Day?’  If he had read today’s Sports Curmudgeon blog, he would have been $88,400 richer before income taxes.”

What can I say?  Of course you should read these rants on a daily basis; this is one of the tangible benefits one may receive in doing so; for the rest of the days, you will simply enjoy the sublime harmony of the vibe here …  But wait, there’s more!

When I wrote about the sale of the Connecticut Sun and the impending relocation of the team, I mentioned that the Sun’s owners had a higher bid for the franchise but that it had been nixed by the league.  I did not understand how or why that happened, but it did.  Well, “the reader in Houston” is evidently on a first-name basis with the owner of the Houston Rockets and now the Connecticut Sun – – to be renamed the Houston Comets – – and sent along this explanation:

“The commissioner had previously identified Houston, not Boston, as the next city in line for a team, following the expansion process or by the purchase of the Sun, as the Mohegan Tribe was in beaucoup debt and needed cash badly. Since relocation decisions are made by the WNBA Board of Governors, not by individual teams or buyers, this allowed the Board to veto the proposed move of the Sun to Boston or possibly Hartford.

• “Til, as the Rockets owner, besides being in a powerful position and ‘blessed’ with a Midas touch, offered a strong ownership structure with the Toyota Center available. Also, Houston is a top-10 media market with a history of success in the WNBA, having hosted the league’s first dynasty with four straight championships.
• “Boston obviously has an NBA arena, but the WNBA was willing to pass on them with the expectation the city would be in line for an expansion team as early as 2031, as the league preferred to let Boston remain open for a potentially higher-priced, future expansion franchise in the area of $400M or above. The league viewed the Boston potential owners as ‘taking’ a market, rather than growing into one which Houston offered.
• “The Houston move also shows where the league is headed – away from independently owned franchises.”

“The new franchises, such as Golden State and now Toronto, and upcoming teams in Cleveland/Detroit/Philadelphia, are either owned by or strongly aligned with local NBA ownership groups.

“Independently owned teams like the Chicago Sky, Atlanta Dream, LV Aces, Dallas Wings, LA Sparks, Seattle Storm, and the Sun are the remaining fully independent clubs, though they face pressure as the league pivots to billionaire, often NBA-linked, owners.”

So, there you have it; a little information, a little entertainment and zero work on my part.  How better do you start a day?

Finally, to keep with the “Houston connection” for today, here is something from George Foreman:

“When I was a kid in Houston, we were so poor we couldn’t afford the last 2 letters, so we called ourselves po’.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

The NFL actively seeks to be “in the news” 365 days a year.  In looking to meet that objective, this is the time of year when the NFL owners adopt new rules for the upcoming season; that comes from an annual meeting of the owners at this time every year.  This year, there will be five rule changes and one surprising rule that will not change.

The rule that will stay allows for the Tush Push.  Last year, a ban on the Tush Push came within one vote of passing; I thought for sure that meant the end of the Tush Push this year but that was not the case.  As far as I can tell from reports, the idea of banning never came before the owners for a vote; so, I guess the sentiment is:

• Long live the Tush Push.

The five changes this year are interesting, but none will change the game to the extent that the so-called Dynamic Kickoff changed the game.  Here are the changes:

1. After a score, the kicking team can declare an onside kick at any point in the game.  Previously, the kicking team had to be behind in order to try an onside kick and even then, it had to be in the fourth quarter of the game.
2. Eliminate the incentive for a kicking team to kick the ball out of bounds intentionally when kicking off from the 50-yardline.
3. Modify the receiving team alignment on kickoffs
4. League folks can consult with on-field officials on matters related to ejections for things like flagrant fouls or non-football acts.
5. For 2026 only, the NFL Officiating Department can overrule clear and obvious mistaken calls on the field.

Let me parse these quickly:

1. I am not sure this change is a big deal; teams in the lead do not try a lot of onside kicks.
2. This only affects kickoffs that come after a 15-yard penalty on a scoring play preceding the kickoff.  This is a good idea; it probably will not happen often.
3. The alignment modifications are immensely arcane; no fan viewing at home will discern a significant change in the game as a result of this rule change.
4. This is a great idea; when a fight breaks out, officials upstairs can view the play and see who started it and who retaliated and who deserves punishment(s).  The officials on the field often do not get to see the “whole picture”.
5. The last rune change is there in case the NFL has to go with “Replacement Refs” again due to stalled negotiations between the NFL and the Referees’ Union.

Moving on …  Surely, you have read about or seen pictures of the recent “two-car accident” involving Tiger Woods.  He was arrested over the weekend on charges of DUI and refusing to take a DUI test; not surprisingly, he made bail and is out and about.  At no point between the time of the accident and the present did I think Tiger Woods would be sentenced to jail for this accident and that whatever charges were brought against him would either be dismissed or pleaded down to something trivial.

I also said to a neighbor on Monday of this week that I fully expected an announcement that Tiger Woods would be “seeking therapy” and that he would be taking time to heal and to recalibrate his life.  As if on cue, here is the headline for an article at CBSSports.com:

• Tiger Woods will seek treatment following DUI arrest, stepping away from golf days before 2026 Masters

And here is how Tiger Woods articulated his current predicament and what he was going to do about it:

“I know and understand the seriousness of the situation I find myself in today.  I am stepping away for a period of time to seek treatment and focus on my health. This is necessary in order for me to prioritize my well-being and work towards lasting recovery.

“I’m committed to taking the time needed to return in a healthier, stronger, and more focused place, both personally and professionally. I appreciate your understanding and support, and ask for privacy for my family, loved ones and myself at this time.”

Question:

• Did he miss any of the touch-points for prepared statements in situations of this kind?

What is the “Over/Under” for how long he will be in “treatment” before he emerges “healthier, stronger and more focused”?  If I set the date at May 10^th, I’ll take the UNDER.

Finally, since today is April Fool’s Day, let me close with this from Mark Twain:

“The first of April is the day we remember what we are the other 364 days of the year.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

There is WNBA news today.  The Native American tribe that owned the Connecticut Sun – – along with the Mohegan Sun casino – – sold the WNB A franchise to Tilman Fertitta who is the current US Ambassador to Italy and who also owns the NBA’s Houston Rockets.  The sales price was $300M and Fertitta is expected to move the team to Houston in 2027 and re-name it as the Houston Comets.  Meanwhile, the team will play out the 2026 season in Uncasville, CT.

That price tag of $300M is the highest amount ever paid for a WNBA franchise; the two new expansion teams that will enter the WNBA later this decade only paid $200M as their “entry fee”.  The tribe had a higher bid of $325M from a minority owner of the Boston Celtics who planned to move the team to Boston, but the league evidently nixed the deal because it “preferred” having the team play in Houston instead of Boston.  No, I don’t know why that was the case; but according to multiple reports, that is what happened.

In other basketball news, the NBA reportedly is considering three “proposals” to eliminate – or at least minimize – tanking teams.  Please note that a league that continues to permit tanking loses any claim on the moral high ground when the phrase “integrity of the games” comes forth.  And in the NBA now, tanking is more common than fighting for advantageous playoff positioning.

There will be ten teams in this year’s Draft Lottery; there is absolutely no doubt which ten teams that will be; the Lottery participants have all seen to it that they cannot be excluded.  I could probably make a strong case in favor of at least eight of those teams as “intentional tankers” so if I were looking for an adjective to describe the current “tanking environment” I would probably say that the practice was “rampant”.

The proposal that seems to get the most attention for now would be to expand the Lottery to include the ten teams that do not make the playoffs PLUS the eight teams that take part in the play-in round of the playoffs.  That would almost double the number of teams seeking high picks theoretically diminishing the incentive to lose regular season games.  While that is mathematically the case, I think such a system would simply relocate the tanking line.  Teams would be incentivized to finish below sixth place in their conference rather than fifth or sixth place because a Lottery seat would accrue to teams finishing seventh and below.

There is a theoretical solution to the problem, but I doubt it could be implemented.  Tanking is sort of like pornography; Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart said:

“I shall not today attempt further to define… ‘hard‑core pornography’… But I know it when I see it.”

Trying to define tanking is a fool’s errand, but fans and Commissioner Adam Silver know it when they see it on the court in regular season games.  So, if the Commish had the cojones once or maybe twice to strip a “tanking team” of its draft pick for a year, tanking would screech to a halt.  Maybe if David Stern were still exchanging oxygen in the biosphere, such a situation might happen …

Meanwhile, Mark Cuban has offered an idea to pump up the interest in regular season NBA games.  Rather than shorten the season to make individual games more meaningful, Cuban suggests shortening NBA games from 48 minute to 40 minutes.  He points out correctly that games of 40 minutes duration are the norm in college, in women’s basketball, in FIBA games and in the Olympics; ergo why 48 minutes in the NBA?

His reasoning is that with fewer minutes to be played, there will be less need for “load management” by teams in the regular season.  Cutting 8 minutes off regulation time would save almost 10,000 minutes of action and until you think about it closely, that should mean fewer rest breaks for star players.  Let me channel Hamlet here:

“Aye, there’s the rub …”

No player in the NBA is averaging as many as 40 minutes per game; Tyrese Maxey leads the league with 38,3 minutes per game.  Let me randomly pick three NBA stars here:

• Kevin Durant plays 36.5 minutes per game
• Luka Doncic plays 36.0 minutes per game
• Anthony Edwards plays 35.5 minutes per game

Why would a coach reduce their playing time significantly if the game were shortened to 40 minutes?  Would it not be a “winning strategy” to have a teams “best players” on the court for almost the entire game – – which would not cause any change in their “scheduling”?  The impact of Cuban’s proposal seems to me to be on the sixth and seventh man on each team who will see fewer minutes and then on the eighth and ninth man who might not see the floor more than two or three times a month.

Finally, this from Maya Angelou:

“There is nothing so pitiful as a young cynic because he has gone from knowing nothing to believing nothing.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

Hank Nichols died last weekend at the age of 89.  That name may not be familiar to everyone, but in the 1970s and 1980s, Hank Nichols was not just a college basketball referee; he was the best college basketball referee.  Officiating basketball was something I did as an “outside activity” during the time Hank Nichols was doing it for real; I aspired to call a game and control a game as well as he did all the time.  Needless to say, that was never the case.

Rest in peace, Hank Nichols …

Speaking about officiating, there was a report last week that all is not peaches and cream with NFL officials.  ESPN.com said then that talks between the league and the union representing the NFL officials broke off talks after reaching an impasse in trying to come up with a new CBA for the officials.  The current CBA expires at the end of May 2026.

The league says the union wants money and the league wants performance accountability.  The union says the league does not respect the level of commitment and contribution that its members make to the NFL product.  There are still two months to go until that current CBA goes away; so, this sort of rhetorical exchange is not unexpected.  However, there needs to be some sensible interchange ongoing in both camps because that deadline is approaching.

The NFL has begun a process of “vetting” new officials.  Like it or not, “new officials” will need to be considered “replacement refs” with all of the negative baggage that label carries with it from an earlier labor negotiation created.  Now, if you are tempted to “pick a side” in this dispute, let me offer some data:

• There are about 150 NFL on-field officials, and I read a report that the average salary for an official is $205K.  So total salary costs to the NFL would be about $30M.  If travel expenses plus other “overhead expenses” were as much as 100% of salary, that would men total cost to the league is $60M.
• NFL officiating is a “part-time gig” for most officials.  Let me just say that very few people in the US have “part time gigs” that pay more than $200K plus travel expenses.

The NFL is a business entity that has revenues in the $20B neighborhood; while a cost of $60M is not negligible, it is a charge that can be accommodated in the business structure.  At the same time, those 150 or so officials have themselves a pretty sweet deal as it is; those terms do not lend themselves to expressions of “worker exploitation”.

Here is my Bottom Line:

• Do not let greed or ego stand in the way of a new CBA.  Neither side can claim any sort of moral high ground here; settle down and make the numbers work.

Since I have been watching college basketball extensively over the past few weeks, I have noticed Geno Auriemma’s presence in a couple of ad campaigns.  That prompted me to go and look at his record at UConn – – his only head coaching stop in women’s college basketball.  It is important to note that when he took over the program at UConn, the Lady Huskies had only had one winning season in the program’s history.  That all changed in the 1986-1987 season, which was Auriemma’s second year on the job.  In his overall tenure at UConn, his teams have gone 1288-165, which is a win percentage of .886.

Looking at the UConn record a little more closely, you can see:

• 37 NCAA Tournament appearances
• 25 Final Four appearances – – including this season
• 12 National Championships
• 6 undefeated seasons – – with this season pending as a seventh undefeated season.

Saying that Geno Auriemma can coach a bit is like saying that guy Sinatra could sing a bit.

There is likely to be a community sense of euphoria in Storrs, CT today with both the mane’s and women’s basketball teams in the Final Four of their respective tournaments.  The men’s team advanced on a miraculous comeback win last night over Duke.  In the first half, it looked as if Duke could simply name the score of the game; the UConn offense was discombobulated, and the UConn defense was noting more than mediocre.  All that changed in the final 15minutes of the game and UConn won the game on a last second shot “from the logo” and advanced to play Illinois next Saturday.  The winner of that game will face a difficult task against the winner of the Michigan/Arizona game in the other bracket.

Finally, something from Geno Auriemma seems proper here:

“I’m a hardass, but we wouldn’t have had all the accomplishments we have as a basketball program if that’s all I was. Players would have stopped listening to me, and I would have been run out of coaching if that’s all I was. So, I think we win because I am, because I demand sometimes more than they can give. But I don’t know what that is until I find out you can’t give it.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

The March Madness sequence that involves cutting the field from Sweet-16 to Final Four is usually the best weekend of basketball of the year considering both quality and quantity.  Normally, all the teams playing are playing at a high level of talent and efficiency; there are not nearly as many games as in the first weekend of the tournament, but there are usually no mismatches either.  With that backdrop, I settled in last night to savor what eight of the Sweet-16 teams had to offer.  Here are some comments:

• Iowa 77  Nebraska 71:
  • Iowa sure doesn’t look like a “9-seed” tonight.
  • Game was close from the start; biggest lead was about 10 points.
• Purdue 79  Texas 77:
  • Texas had to win a play-in game to get in the tournament.
  • Giving 2^nd seed Purdue all it can handle.
  • Tramon Mark is a stud.
• Arizona 109  Arkansas 88:
  • Arkansas plays lackadaisical defense; that is fatal against Arizona’s offense.
  • Koa Peat is only 19 years old?
• Illinois 65  Houston 55:
  • Every shot is contested by both defenses – – tenacious defense all around.
  • Illinois grinds out every possession on offense – – no great scorers but no lack of effort.
  • Houston can’t shoot.  [Final stats = 22 of 64 from 2-point range.]

I said in an earlier rant that AJ Dybantsa was the most entertaining player I saw in the first rounds of the tournament and I continue to believe that.  If he were to decide to go to the NBA next year, I suspect he will need to add more than a little muscle to his frame.  Not so with Koa Peat of Arizona.  He is listed at 6’ 8” and 235 lbs.; that might have been accurate back in November at the start of the season, but he looks bigger than that now.  His body is already “NBA ready”.

I want to make one more comment about the Arizona/Arkansas game.  In the second half as Arizona was pulling away to make the outcome completely obvious, the Arkansas players stopped playing basketball for a short period and sought to “thug-up the game”.  There was one incident where the officials had to call a Flagrant-2 foul and eject a player to maintain order on the court.  That is not a good look for the team and specifically for Coach Calipari.  I understand that emotions on the court can sometimes be difficult to control, but the coach on the bench is an adult who is nominally in charge of the team, and it behooves the coach and the game itself for that coach to intervene and put a stop to “thuggery”.

• Not a shining moment for Coach Calipari there …

Moving on …  Thanksgiving is a time for families to come together to celebrate a holiday that acknowledges the blessings that have come to family members; it is nominally a time of camaraderie and fellowship.  There is a household in the Philly area where such may not be the case come November 2026.

Phillies’ infielder, Alec Bohm, just filed a lawsuit against his parents accusing them of defrauding him and mismanaging his money.  He seeks $3M from his parents and a full accounting of “his money”.  According to Spotrac.com Bohm has career earnings of $27.7M and is currently on a 1-year deal for $10.2M which was agreed to as a way to avoid salary arbitration in the MLB offseason.  Not surprisingly, the parents deny any malfeasance in the matter.

We are early in the legal process here; we are at the stage where both sides have issued statements of their position:

Per Bohm’s lawsuit:

“Daniel and Lisa Bohm, used several limited liability companies to funnel money from his personal financial accounts, which they then ‘converted to their own use.’

Per the parents’ lawyer:

“Mr. and Mrs. Bohm love their son very much and have always acted in his best interests, both personally and professionally and still do so to this day.  They are deeply saddened by the allegations made against them in this lawsuit and the sensational false narrative painted here, which they believe are entirely without merit.”

Don’t worry about passing the cranberry sauce in late November here …

Finally, an appropriate closing comment from Clarence Darrow:

“The first half of our lives are ruined by our parents and the second half by our children.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

The NBA is going to “explore” the possibility of expanding by two teams as early as 2028/2029.  It has been a while since the league expanded (the Hornets entered the league in 2004) and save for the merger of the NBA and the ABA, expansion has usually been one-at-a-time.  The last time two teams entered together was in the 1990s when the Raptors and the Grizzlies came into existence.  The cities being targeted now are Seattle and Las Vegas.

The motivation here is crystal clear; each new franchise will cost the new owner several billions of dollars which will be divided up among the existing owners.  That might mean a “direct deposit” of something like $300M for each existing owner in the next couple of years; I don’t anticipate that any of those owners are likely to view that as a negative incentive.  Unless …

The NBA owners are successful in the world of business; that is how they got the money to buy the franchises they now own.  The NBA has in place a long-tern lucrative TV deal which is currently being shared by 30 teams; expansion would divide that revenue stream by 32 teams.  So, maybe the calculation gets a tad “trickier”.

The expansion draft might not be as clean as it would be for only one team entering the league.  When the Hornets drafted existing NBA players, no team stood to lose more than one player.  Well, if that holds true here and each new franchise gets 15 players in the Expansion Draft, every team will lose one player, and the two expansion teams would be required to take someone from the bottom-feeding teams which cannot possibly be an attractive thought.

There is also a decision to be made regarding the new teams’ position in the NBA Draft.  Previous expansion teams were not given top picks; I read one report that said the Timberwolves and the Magic had to wait until #10 and #11 in the collegiate draft in their expansion year.  Obviously, granting a higher slot in the draft will make a good negotiation point for the league in setting the price for the two new franchises – – but that means two existing teams will get lower lottery picks and that is not fully exciting.

And there is one more issue for the league to deal with – – Geography.  It should not be difficult to conclude that both Las Vegas and Seattle should be in the Western Conference.  If the league is to remain balanced that would mean sending a current Western team to the Eastern Conference.  The two teams currently in the West that are the furthest east are the Memphis Grizzlies and/or the New Orleans Pelicans.  I have no idea what the owners there might think about being “uprooted” within the league nor do I have any sense that owners of Eastern teams would be welcoming.

The bottom line here is that the big fat payday that results from expansion brings some uncertainties with it.  That is why the league is only “exploring” the possibility of expansion.  But with that tidbit tossed into the public domain, it required Adam Silver to “meet the press” and discuss a variety of issues including:

• Tanking: The league has tried to stamp out tanking for decades and has been singularly unsuccessful.  The Commissioner has said it was high on his priority list and this week he said that changes will be coming to reduce the incentives for tanking teams.  We have heard that before and the reason it never seems to work is a feature specific to the game of basketball.  One great player can alter the direction and the fortune of a basketball team far greater than is likely in either baseball or football.  Here is Silver’s comment after meeting with all the NBA owners:

“I will say it seemed unanimous in the room that we needed to make a change, and we needed to make a change for next season.  Exactly what that change is, we’re continuing to work on. No votes were taken today. I think there’s also unanimous agreement that we need to make this change in advance of the draft and free agency this year, so all the teams understand the rules of the road going into next year. That means we will most likely have a special board meeting in May, in which, at that point, we will vote on whatever modification we come up with.”

Good luck, Commish …

• “The 65-game rule”:  Currently, for a player to be eligible for major awards like MVP, they must play in 65 games or more.  Cade Cunningham has a collapsed lung and may not make it to 65 games this season, but he should get a lot of consideration as MVP.  The rule was intended to limit “load management”; Cade Cunningham is not “load managing”; a collapsed lung is nothing but serious.  The union wants the rule changed/modified/waived; the league has taken that under advisement.

 Finally, these words from George Washington seem appropriate today:

“Few men have virtue to withstand the highest bidder.”

Burt don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

Today starts the 2026 MLB regular season; the Yankees and the Giants take center stage for a single game opener this year.  But before I get to baseball today, there is another big story out there.  Yesterday, UNC fired coach Hubert Davis; the Tar Heels’ late-game collapse in the tournament against VCU is the proximal cause of the firing, but Davis’ tenure there has not been nearly up to the consistent standard of UNC basketball.

This is a big deal because Carolina basketball has been a “family matter” for years; Carolina’s coaches retire; they are not “asked to go elsewhere”.  Moreover, it looks as if UNC will have to “go outside the family” for its new coach and some of the names being thrown out are at places that never realized their coaches might be tempted to leave.  Rumors have it that these coaches – – among others – – are “in play”:

• Billy Donovan – – Head Coach of the Chicago Bulls
• Tommy Lloyd – – Head Coach at Arizona
• Dusty May – – Head Coach at Michigan
• Brad Stevens – – GM of the Boston Celtics

UNC’s decision to go looking for a new coach could have ripple effects down the line.  The only school that would seem not to have to worry would be Duke; there is no way on the planet that UNC would offer Jon Scheyer the job nor any chance he would take it.

Now back to baseball.  In the American League:

• I like the Yankees, Tigers and Mariners to win their divisions.
• If you are looking for dark horses, I suggest the Red Sox and the Royals.

In the National League:

• I like the Phillies (slightly), Cubs and Dodgers to win their divisions.
• If you are looking for dark-horses, I suggest the Giants and the D-Backs

Someone somewhere must have a potent voodoo doll targeting the Atlanta Braves pitching staff.  If you look at the Braves’ roster, they have 5 “RHPs” on the Injured List and two of the five were clearly slotted to be in the starting rotation.

My pick of the Phillies to win the NL East assumes that Zack Wheeler will indeed recover from his thoracic outlet surgery and give the team several months of quality starting pitching.  If that does not materialize …

I have five selections for Win Totals this season:

1. The O’s won only 75 games last year, but they upgraded in the offseason specifically adding power hitting in Pete Alonso; they will be better in 2026.  However, the win total for the O’s is now at 86.5 and that is too high because they have so many division games against tough opponents.  Orioles UNDER 86.5 wins.
2. The Tigers are the best team in a mediocre AL Central.  Assuming Tarik Skubal retains most if not all of his form over the past couple of seasons, they should win the division, and the Tigers will go OVER 85.5 wins.
3. The Mets won 83 games last year and lost Edwin Diaz and Pete Alonso to free agency.  The win total line for 2026 is at 90.5 wins; I don’t see that happening.  Mets UNDER 90.5 wins
4. The Reds won 83 games last year and the total this year is projected at 81.5.  Hunter Greene had elbow surgery and is not expected to be back until June or July.  I think that is bad news for the Reds.  Reds UNDER 81.5 wins.
5. The D-Backs added Nolan Arenado to a team that won 80 games last year.
   The win total this year is 79.5.  D-Backs OVER 79.5 wins.

The 2026 season will introduce robo-umps to the game and there will be challenges to calls of balls and strikes allowed – – maybe even encouraged.  Here is the process as I understand it:

• Human umpires make the calls on balls and strikes.
• Hitters, pitchers and/or catchers can challenge, and the robo-ump’s measurements are then shown to all in the stadium and anyone watching on TV.  Call is confirmed or overturned…  Managers cannot challenge.

Sounds simple, right?

• Teams start with two challenges apiece and need to use them sparingly/judiciously.  Successful challenges are retained; unsuccessful ones are gone.
• Extra challenges will be available for extra-inning games.
• Games played outside normal MLB venues (Mexico City games or Little League Classic games) will NOT have robo-ump technology and will “revert” to old-school baseball.

And here is how/where old-style baseball rhubarbs can remain in the tradition of baseball:

• Umpires can disallow any challenge if the umpire concludes that the player’s decision to challenge was “other players or the dugout”.  It must be the pitcher, catcher or batter acting alone.

Each batter has his own specific strike zone; players have been measured to within a millimeter to determine the top and bottom of each player’s strike zone.  The top is 53.5% of the player’s height and the bottom is 27% of the player’s height.  The width and depth of the strike zone are determined by the dimensions of home plate.

Settle in for the start of the 2026 MLB season.

Finally, an appropriate way to usher in a new baseball season is to hear from Bob Uecker:

“The biggest thrill a ballplayer can have is when your son takes after you. That happened when my Bobby was in his championship Little League game. He really showed me something. Struck out three times. Made an error that lost the game. Parents were throwing things at our car and swearing at us as we drove off. Gosh, I was proud.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

My long-suffering wife would probably describe my behavior over last weekend as “an orgy of basketball”; I prefer to see it as a total immersion in March Madness.  Perspective is everything …  However, you choose to believe what the environment was like last weekend here in Curmudgeon Central, here are my notes from the games and the TV presentation.

Bruce Pearl replaced Jay Wright as the “coach-in-residence” on one of the studio shows this year; that is not/was not an upgrade on the commentary front nor on the sartorial front.  Coach Wright used to show up on set in an “Armani suit” that probably cost a couple grand; Coach Pearl wore a sports jacket with a pattern reminiscent of the rug in you Aunt Betty’s mud room.  No matter what the management gurus tell you, all change is not for the better.

Jim Spanarkel is teamed with Spero Dedes this year.  It is an excellent pairing because Dedes does the game under control and Spanarkel provides insight with a touch of humor.  Jim Spanarkel used to be paired with Ian Eagle – – and that was a great announcing duo – – but when Eagle was “promoted” to the #1 broadcast team slot by CBS, they found another outstanding play-by-play guy to match with Spanarkel.

• Memo To AT&T Ad Executives: “Lily” was a whole lot more entertaining than the “Guarantee Guys” and/or “Ted”.
• Just saying …

Notes from Friday’s games:

• Santa Clara/Kentucky was probably the best first round game this year and both teams deserved to win.
• Wright State/UVA was a toss-up with 3:00 left in the game.  UVA had a late spurt, but that game was much closer than the final score would indicate.
• Utah St./Villanova:  Entertaining back and forth game.  The team that made the last scoring run won it and moved on.
• UCLA/UCF:  UCLA coach [Mick Cronin] is a sideline asshole”.  Get a grip man; you’re an adult.   Also, UCF foul shooting should be an emphasis in practice; they shot 5 for 16 in the game.  Blowing the front end of a one-and-one is the equivalent of a turnover; foul shooting must be better than 31%.
• UConn/Furman:  Dan Hurley was calm and composed on the sideline; I hope he is OK.

Notes from Saturday’s games:

• Michigan St./Louisville:  If you ever need to point to a game as an example of “winning ugly”, this should be on your list of exhibits.
• Arkansas/High Point:  It’s like watching a tennis match.
• Nebraska/Vandy:  Most entertaining game of the tournament so far.
• Texas/Gonzaga:  Texas is this year’s Cinderella; the Longhorns make the Sweet 16 after being in a playoff game and having lost 14 games in the regular season.
• VCU trailed Illinois by 7 at the half but there was no furious comeback this time.  Illinois is workmanlike not spectacular.
• Michigan is the best team I have seen in the tournament so far.

Instead of notes from all the Sunday games, let me suggest that what I saw on Sunday reminded me of the story of the coelacanth.  For those of you not particularly interested in biological evolution, let me give you a Cliff Notes version of the coelacanth story.

• The coelacanth was known from the fossil record; it is a lobe-finned fish but not all the body structure of bony fishes; it is thought to be part of the evolutionary process that took fish out of the sea and onto land.  The oldest coelacanth fossils are about 400 million years old.  The species was thought to be extinct until 1938 when a fisherman caught one and retained it.  That fisherman – – looking at his catch of an extinct species – – may have had something in common with me watching Sunday’s games.
  • • In the Purdue/Miami game, there was a 3-second violation called by one of the officials.  I haven’t seen one of those in a long time.
    • Then in the Kentucky/Iowa state game, there was a violation called for “palming the basketball”.  Holy Ancient Relics, Batman …

Finally, this truth from comedian Joey Adams:

“Do not worry about avoiding temptation.  As you grow older, it will avoid you.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports ………