Strange Stuff Today …

There is a report in the Orlando Sentinel that the Florida High School Athletic Association (FHSAA) voted to start the high school football season and the girls’ volleyball season on time this Fall.  The leaders of the FHSAA ignored the recommendation(s) of its own Sports Medicine Advisory Committee as it took that action.  The chairwoman of that advisory committee is a physician with the Mayo Clinic in Jax; here is her statement:

“It is our stance that return to competition for the high-risk sports of football and volleyball is not medically safe.”

It may be difficult, but please put aside any political leanings you might have regarding COVID-19 and state mandates regarding personal behaviors.  In addition, please remember that I am rooting for a return of football this Fall; I want that to happen.  Having said that, this action by the FHSAA makes no sense.

  • Right now, in the State of Florida, the community spread of COVID-19 is as bad as it is anywhere in the US.
  • Certain counties in southern Florida report that they can count the number of vacant ICU beds on two hands with fingers left over.

The question here is simple:

  • Why does the FHSAA bother to have a Sports Medicine Advisory Committee?

In another corner of the football universe, there have been recent comments from LSU coach, Ed Orgeron, that fall somewhere between “wishful thinking” and “magical thinking”.  Here is a smattering of what he supposedly said:

“We need football.  Football is the lifeblood of our country.”  [Coach, I love football; it ain’t the lifeblood of our country.]

“Whether we start Sept. 5 or a little after that; in-conference, out of conference, that doesn’t bother me. I do know this; I believe we’re going to play.”   [Coach, I really hope you are right.  I hope just as fervently that your concerns for the health of the players on your team and your opponents’ teams is as strong as your obvious love for football.]

For the last 5 years, the Buffalo Bills have played their home games in New Era Field; the naming rights belonged to the New Era Cap company in Buffalo.  The company now wants out of that deal – not for reasons similar in any way to the reasons that FedEx threatened to take its name off the Washington stadium – and so there is a “naming rights opportunity” out there for the taking.  The Tushy Bidet company – – its goal is to Tushify every bathroom in the US – – has said it would be interested in putting its name on the stadium and that it would try to bring a college football bowl game there and call it the Toilet Bowl.

Greg Cote of the Miami Herald summarized this tidbit and hit all the low notes:

“The Buffalo Bills’ stadium needs a new name sponsor, and a bidet company called Tushy is bidding. Decorum prevents us from noting that Tushy Stadium sounds like a pretty crappy name.”

I have one last item today and it is something I have mentioned before.  The reporters who cover golf should be ashamed of themselves; they are not reporting on the sport and their writing is not nearly close enough to “deathless prose” to mitigate their poor and subjective reporting.  Far too many golf reporters spend far too much time in an obsequious posture at the feet of Tiger Woods.  That unprofessional nonsense was in full display over the weekend and yesterday.

In last week’s tournament Tiger Woods finished 15 strokes behind the tournament winner.  He finished in a 4-way tie with 3 other golfers whose names happen to be:

  • Scott Harrington
  • Marc Leishman
  • Ryan Moore

I list their names here because the reporting on the tournament ignored them even though their performance was as relevant to the tournament outcome as was Woods’.  That is the polite way of saying that all four of them finished – – in racetrack parlance – – up the track.

However, Tiger Woods got a ton of coverage that was irrelevant to the outcome.  Here is a headline from on Monday morning:

  • Improvement comes Sunday as Woods closes 2020 Memorial Tournament on high note

For someone like me who did not watch the tournament live on TV the day before, the implication here is that Woods rallied in the final round but that he started the day so far off the lead that he could not win the tournament.  So, I clicked on the headline and found this to be Paragraph #1:

“Tiger Woods ended his 2020 Memorial Tournament with a 76, which sounds terrible until you compare it to what the rest of the field is doing. Woods’ 76 was exactly the field average at the time he finished on a Muirfield Village course that was playing 4 over in major championship-like conditions.”

And you think that political campaign managers spin the news?

  1. The course did not play 4-over at the end of the day because the players who were playing well over the weekend finished after Woods was in the clubhouse.
  2. Woods also shot a 76 on Friday – – when the course was playing “normally”.  Forty golfers who made the cut shot under par on Friday – if I counted correctly.
  3. Thirty-nine golfers finished ahead of Woods – and the other three golfers who finished at +6 for the tournament.  That ended the tournament on a “high note”?

That kind of “reporting” is shameful; it is not journalism; it is close to idolatry; it is time for it to stop.

Finally, Dwight Perry had this golf-related item in the Seattle Times recently.  I suspect the golf writers of the day did not report fully on these events either:

“David Feherty says his finest moment in golf came at St. Andrews, where ‘I captained the Irish side that won the 3-man world championship back in 1990 in a blind hangover. I threw up twice on the course.’

“Which certainly gives the golf term ‘up and down’ a whole new meaning.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports



Pat Forde Realigns College Football

A couple of days ago, a reader asked in a comment to the daily rant if I had any comment on Pat Forde’s radical suggestion to restructure college football.  I did not at the time for the simple reason that I had not seen it, but now I have and so I will comment.

Forde’s article appears on  In the broadest overview, he proposes limiting “Division 1 College Football” to 120 teams that are regionally organized into 12 conferences of 10 teams each.  Every one of the current football conferences is shattered in his proposed realignment and he proposes that 11 of the current teams in what we call “FBS Football” are relegated/demoted to “FCS Football”.  Aligning the new conferences regionally/geographically intends to reduce travel times and costs as well as developing new potential rivalry situations.

Forde proposes a 10-game season where every team plays the other 9 teams in its new conference plus one other game out of conference.  Note, there is no room here for Powerhouse State to schedule a glorified scrimmage against The National Rehabilitation School for Multiple Amputees.  I am beginning to like this idea…

None of the conferences will have a championship game; each conference champion will be determined within the regular season schedule using tiebreakers presumably.  Those 10 conference champions along with 2 other wild card teams would be seeded  into a 12-team playoff grid to determine an on-field College Football Champion.

There is one paragraph in the article that I particularly like:

“There still will be bowl games for the teams that don’t make the CFP. Just fewer of them, which nobody should mind.”

Indeed, I would not mind at all…

The Forde Plan – – it must have a name if anyone is going to take it even moderately seriously – – would provide consistency to college football scheduling and that is definitely a plus.  The hurdles to adopting such a plan are numerous and they are high hurdles indeed.  Here are what I think are the two biggest ones among those he mentions:

  1. This radical an idea would need to be undertaken with the imprimatur of a centralized “command structure” for college football.  That does not exist.  Please do not delude yourself into thinking that Mark Emmert and the jamokes at NCAA HQs can or do fill that role.
  2. This works only if all the 10 new conferences share the revenues from media rights and the expanded college football playoff system.  That means the current “Power 5” conferences will have to share money with schools from the “Other Guys”.  That idea will go over like an anvil in a cesspool.

Please read the article in its entirety as linked here.  There are plenty of benefits and problems associated with the idea and Forde lays them out without too much obvious bias.  Even though I doubt the idea will ever be taken seriously by any of the current conferences, there are some very appealing aspects to it.

            One very interesting aspect to Forde’s Plan is that I proposed something along the same lines back in January 2017.  My college football universe was 128 teams broken up into the “Big Boys Category” and the “Little Boys Category”.  Each “Category” would have 4 conferences of 16 teams and each conference would have 2 divisions.  The regular season would be 11 games – – 7 against the division foes and 4 against half of the teams in the other division in the conference.  (That “half” would rotate every year.)

My wrinkle was to have the “Little Boys Category” have a playoff system too and for the top 4 teams in the “Little Boys Category” to be promoted while the bottom 4 teams in the “Big Boys Category” would be relegated.  There are differences between the Forde Plan and my vision for reinventing college football, but we agree on more things than we disagree on.  In any event, here is the key point of commonality between the Forde Plan and “My Plan”:

  • Neither one is gonna happen.

Just for fun, here is the link to my rant from January 2017 if you would like to see how similar the foundations for the two proposals are.  I guess it shows that great minds run in similar channels.  Then again, so does sewer water…

While on the subject of college football, Boomer Esiason said something recently that I hope is completely wrong.  Esiason hosts a morning radio show in NYC; it is on WFAN in the time slot that used to be occupied by Imus in the Morning a long time ago.  According to a report in the NY Post, Esiason suggested that teams reporting large numbers of players who tested positive for COVID-19 had the players get it on purpose.  Here is what he supposedly said:

“I gotta be really careful here, because I don’t want to say that this is an accusation.  I don’t want to … I just was thinking the other day about what is going on with the SEC teams down south. And Clemson included, who’s obviously an ACC team. A lot of their players are coming down with COVID-19, oddly enough. So are they trying to herd immunity their teams?”

I have no insight into any college football programs nor do I have any idea if Esiason has access or sources that led him to say that.  However, I will say that if any college football coach is intentionally infecting members of his team to develop localized herd immunity, that is hugely irresponsible behavior.  About the only thing related to COVID-19 that might be worse would be to find a way to infect most of the players on your upcoming opponent without the other guys knowing about it.

Another problem with Esiason’s comment – without some sort of sourcing – is that it fuels just the sort of speculation on which sports talk radio feasts.  In 2020, people love to hear about and ponder “conspiracy theories” and Esiason took his comment above one more step down that sort of path:

“So these guys can get sick now as opposed to getting sick during the college football season if, in fact, there is one.  And I’m telling you right now I wouldn’t put it past any of those guys down there. I think it’s going on. I honestly … the numbers coming out of like Alabama, LSU and Clemson, all these teams? It’s too much of a coincidence. I don’t think it’s that crazy either.”

That is classic conspiracy theory thinking.  Coincidence becomes evidence and the lack of hard evidence becomes an element of proof for the conspiracy…  I hope he is dead wrong, and I hope that coaches like Nick Saban, Les Miles and Dabo Swinney call him out for that.

Finally, let me stay with today’s theme of college football with a little COVID-19 tossed into the mix with this Tweet from Brad Dickson, formerly with the Omaha World-Herald:

“Good guy Scott Frost has a new PSA where he tells ppl to keep up with routine medical visits during the pandemic. He doesn’t get paid for this. But, after listening to his deadly dull monotone during this brief speech I now know why Nebraska usually plays bad in the third quarter.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………



Heads Up

Earlier this month, I was off the air for a week because my long-suffering wife and I were at our weekend house in Central PA.  The modem on our satellite Internet “contraption” died and we were without Internet access.  This weekend, we are going back there with two nominally effective solutions to that problem.  We only need one of them to work…

Paying tribute to Murphy’s Law, however, I may find myself in an “Internet-starved situation”.  Once again, I might be in an “unplanned time off the air”.

Just a heads up.

Stay safe and stay well, everyone…


RIP Bobby Mitchell

Bobby Mitchell died over the weekend.  Mitchell was the first Black player on the Skins back when George Preston Marshall owned the team.  He came to Washington in a trade for Ernie Davis in 1962.  In his career with the Skins, Mitchell was converted to WR where he was a perennial All-Pro and eventually he was inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame.  He was 84 years old.

Rest in peace, Bobby Mitchell.

Normally, when I rant about the intersection of sports and economics, I am commenting on ticket prices or the value of TV rights deals or revenue splits in a CBA under negotiation.  In this time of COVID-19, there may be a much larger context in which to consider that intersection.  Let me be clear; I am not going to suggest anything like the downfall of humankind; the COVID-19 pandemic will eventually come under control and it is not going to kill off 50% of the world’s population before that happens.  Having said that, there is a very real possibility that sports in the world may be significantly changed in the post-COVID world.

Already, we have seen that life can and will persist in the absence of signature sporting events.  Consider:

  • No March Madness
  • No Spring Training and Opening Day in baseball.
  • No NBA or NHL games
  • No English Premier League games
  • No UEFA or CONCACAF competition
  • No College World Series
  • No Summer Olympics

Yet, the world goes on; and as time passes without the presence of these pleasant activities, people may very well come to a point where sports reside on a lower tier of their life-importance construct.  If – – I said IF – – that comes to pass in a significant number of people, that may mean a much smaller demand for high priced tix and a much diminished willingness to approve spending large blocks of taxpayer money to build sporting venues.  If interest diminishes, TV ratings would likely drop too and that will make ever-increasing TV rights deals a bad revenue projection for leagues and owners.

  • Might the reflex to maintain social distancing and to avoid crowded venues become embedded behavior for a slice of society meaning that going to a college football game with 85,000 of one’s closest friends becomes abnormal?
  • Might folks get used to teleworking – and likewise might their supervisors and colleagues grow to enjoy that arrangement – to the point where folks begin to move away from big cities and spread out a bit?

The macroeconomics and the trends described above are not a certainty; in fact, they may be low-probability events.  But there is a spectrum here between “no effect between sports and COVID at all” on one hand and “near-dystopia” on the other hand.  So, how might the world of sports emerge from the The COVID-19 Era?

  • Sports leagues must not jump the gun and try to open – even on a reduced basis – before the epidemiologists say it is OK to do so.  In fact, they must not be perceived as pressuring the scientists to bless such an opening against the will of the scientists.
  • One of the clichés created by this crisis is the phrase “in an abundance of caution…”  Well, sports will need to be very cautious in terms of their restarting lest they generate headlines that are far worse than “bad optics”.
  • Sports owners should look to generate more interest in their fanbases with things like discounted tickets and reduced parking fees (no more $75 to park your car).
  • Players may need to shave some of their contracts for a while.  It will not look particularly good for players hoping to “create a brand” to refuse to share some pain with the people he/she is hoping to attract to that brand.

Many times in these rants, I have asserted that the NFL and the NFLPA should evidence more realization that they are more like partners in producing a hugely popular TV series than they are deadly foes.  When sports come out of The COVID-19 Era, those two entities will have a chance to demonstrate that they recognize that partnership and its mutual importance.  Sports are entertainment; sports are escape; sports are an emotional release.  Because all those things are important to humans once the basics of Maslow’s hierarchy are secured, sports will continue to exist.  The question comes down to the stature that sports will have in society once they re-emerge.

Almost 2 decades ago, the terrorist attack on the Twin Towers in NYC interrupted the sports world.  There were dystopian forecasts back then regarding the future of sports – and about the world of entertainment itself.  People adapted; when we go to a ballgame now, we have to pass through screening points and metal detectors; women’s purses need to be transparent in some jurisdictions; those things were not commonplace in the 90s, but we adapted our behavior and our acceptance of such activity as “normal” in 2020.  I doubt that we will come to a point where entering a sports venue means taking one of those 5-minute COVID-19 tests before being allowed in, but if a new screening tool is added to the ones in place that is not physically intrusive on one’s body, my guess is that we will adapt to it too.

Finally, here is a COVID-19 observation from Dwight Perry of the Seattle Times:

“England’s Premier League might play matches with no people in the stands for a while once the pandemic ends.

“To assuage hard-core soccer fans, they plan to list the attendance as ‘nil.’”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………



On Hiatus

These rants will go on hiatus as of today until mid-March.

My long-suffering wife and I are leaving on Sunday for a long road trip down the East Coast of the US to Florida and then to return.  Along the way we will be visiting a whole lot of friends, former colleagues and family members who have taken up residence either in Florida or along our way to and from Florida.  As you may well expect, I will manage to fit a couple of spring Training baseball games into the schedule during our time in the Sunshine State.

I will take my computer with me but will not have nearly enough time to do the research and the writing to maintain the normal schedule.  If and when I find time to do some writing, the things will be more like postcards than normal offerings.

We will return on 13 March and my plan is to get back to normal writing rhythm starting on Monday 16 March.

Stay well, everyone…



Administrative Note

There will be no rant tomorrow.  Thanksgiving is a day for family, feasting and football – – not ranting about sports.

Happy Thanksgiving to all.  Stay well.  See you on Friday.

Upcoming Writing and Posting…

The writing schedule for the next couple of weeks will be on an “as time allows” basis.   I have some family obligations to discharge over the next several days; then my long-suffering wife and I are heading to Dublin for a visit of about 10 days.

Things should return to some state of normalcy in the week of 4 November – – until some more travel that will lead right up to Thanksgiving time.

Here is what I know:

  1.  There will be no Football Friday this week (10/25/19).
  2.  If there is a Football Friday next week (11/1/19), it will be an abbreviated version.
  3.  Standard daily rants will also likely be abbreviated versions.

Hope to be back to normal on 4 November – for a while…

Stay well, everyone…



Football Friday 10/18/19

I don’t like tacos enough to celebrate Taco Tuesday except by accident.  However, I do like football enough to celebrate Football Friday whenever my schedule will permit.

Last week, the Six-Pack broke even at 3-3.  Cumulatively for the season:

  • Six-Pack is 20-10
  • College games are 9-3
  • NFL games are 11-7


College Football Comments:


The Linfield College Wildcats treated their Homecoming crowd to a blowout win over Puget Sound last week to the tune of 77-22.  Linfield ran out to a 35-0 lead and never looked back.  That brings the Wildcats record to 3-1 for the season; since their Division III regular season schedule only has 9 games, that puts Linfield just 2 wins short of yet one more winning season in football.  This week the Willamette Bearcats visit McMinnville OR in another Northwest Conference game.  Willamette brings a 2-3 record to the game; there is one common opponent for the two teams:

  • Linfield beat Pacific 52-14
  • Willamette lost to Pacific 59-14
  • Go Wildcats!

College football has always been a regional sport.  In the beginnings, it was an east coast sport played by Ivy League schools and others in that part of the world.  The game migrated south and west; for years now, the “center of gravity” for college football has been from the Carolinas west to Texas and down to the southern border of the US.  For a while, West Coast football was sort of relevant; USC was a dominant team for a while; UCLA was relevant more often than not; more recently Washington and Oregon made noise on a national level.  Such does not look to be the case in 2019.

When Oklahoma defeated Texas last week, it pretty well rendered college football west of Norman OK interesting – – but unimportant.  Maybe the focus of “Western Football” this year is Boise St. who is undefeated as of this morning with a schedule in front of it that makes you think they could remain in that condition.  No one thinks that the Mountain West Conference is equivalent to the PAC-12 out west – – but most college football observers think the PAC-12 is nothing more than interesting – – but unimportant.

With the college season about half over, there are 4 teams that have underachieved the hype and expectations for those teams back in August.  Please note, three of these four teams have a winning record; those teams are not abject failures; I just think they have fallen short of what was expected from them.

  • Michigan Wolverines:  Yes, they are 5-1 having just beaten Illinois.  However, this was supposed to be the year that Michigan won the Big 10 and crashed the CFP party.  So far this year, the Wolverines have not made me sit up and take notice that they are a powerhouse; it is not clear that they are favorites to win the Big 10 East – – let alone the Conference Championship.  Michigan struggled to beat Army (certainly not a CFP candidate) and later beat Iowa (not a CFP candidate either) by the rousing score of 10-3.  Moreover, that loss on their record is not just a blot; it was a total beatdown by Wisconsin.
  • Tennessee Volunteers:  The Vols won last week to raise their record to 2-4.  No one outside Knoxville – other than those folks who sings Rocky Top as a lullaby to put their kids to sleep – thought that Tennessee would beat out the real big dogs in the SEC for the SEC Championship in 2019.  But no one expected the Vols to be this bad – – especially not coach Jeremy Pruitt who has seen his team lose to Georgia State and then lose to BYU after leading by what should have been a comfortable margin in the 4th quarter.  The next two weeks pit the Vols against serious competition; this week at Alabama and next week at home against South Carolina.   After that, the schedule softens significantly but by then, the Vols may need to win-out to be bowl eligible.
  • UCF Golden Knights:  UCF is 4-2 on the season having lost two of its last 3 games.  We heard so much over the past 2 years about how UCF was the shadow national champion and the idea was they would roll though 2019 undefeated again and maybe – – just MAYBE – – get the big guys in college football to give then a shot at the real national championship.  As they would often say to losing contestants on TV game shows:

“What lovely parting gifts do we have for the Golden Knights, Bob?”

  • Washington Huskies:  The Huskies are 5-2; the losses are to Cal and Stanford which are good but not great teams; of the five wins, probably the best opponent was USC whose record stands today at 3-3.  There was talk during the summer that this was the year that the PAC-12 would not be shut out of the CFP festivities and that Washington would be the PAC-12 rep in the tournament.  That is not going to happen with those two losses already on the books.

Looking at remaining schedules, two teams are interesting now.  Auburn is 5-1 with 6 game remaining.  Here are 3 of those 6 opponents:

  • At LSU
  • Vs. Georgia
  • Vs. Alabama

Another schedule that caught my eye was Minnesota.  The Gophers are 6-0 now and with Rutgers on tap this week and with Maryland up next week, there is good reason to expect that record to inflate to 8-0.  Then the road gets bouncier:

  • Vs. Penn State – undefeated and currently ranked in the Top Ten
  • At Iowa – always tough at home
  • At Northwestern – a relative breather
  • Vs. Wisconsin – undefeated and currently ranked in the Top Ten

I mentioned above that Tennessee won its game last week over Mississippi State by a score of 20-10.  Obviously, coach Jeremy Pruitt slept better on Saturday night than he would have had the Vols lost again.  In addition, this report from Dwight Perry in the Seattle Times indicates that someone else slept better last Saturday night.

“Tyler Ivens, a Knoxville sports-radio host, is living on the roof of Toyota Knoxville and vowing to stay there until the volunteers (1-4 with the only victory coming against Tennessee-Chattanooga) win another football game.

“So, what does he have a better chance of catching first – a win or shingles?”

The big surprise in SEC-land last week was South Carolina beating previously undefeated Georgia at Georgia by a score of 20-17.  The Gamecocks’ defense played an outstanding game.  The color commentator for the game said several times he thought Georgia’s Jake Fromm was the best QB in the country.  I respectfully disagree; Fromm missed too many open throws in this game to be “the best”.  He is a very good QB and he will be drafted in the NFL and can probably play at that level – – but “best in the country”?  I ran across this interesting stat for Georgia and Jake Fromm:

  • When Jake Fromm throws fewer than 30 passes, Georgia is 29-0
  • When Jake Fromm throws 30 or more passes, Georgia is 0-5.

In an embarrassing outcome for SEC football, UNLV beat Vandy 34-10.  Compounding the agony here, the game was in Nashville; I guess the only bright spot here is that it was not Homecoming Weekend.  [That happens this weekend.]  UNLV is now 2-4 for the season and all four losses have been by more than 2 scores.

Alabama beat Texas A&M 47-28.  I said last week that the Aggies could not get themselves into a shoot-out with Alabama; their defense was not able to prevent that from happening.  On the bright side, the Aggies defense held Alabama below its scoring average for the season.  Bama entered the game scoring at a 51.8 points per game clip.

In the Game of the Week, LSU beat Florida 42-28.  LSU remains unbeaten; Florida lost for the first time.  Going into this game the Gators’ defense had been allowing only 9.5 points per game; LSU rang them up for 6 TDs.  LSU QB, Joe Burrow, put up these stats against a very good Florida defense:

  • 21 for 24 for 293 yards and 3 TDs
  • Not a bad day at the office…

I mentioned above that Oklahoma beat Texas in the Red River Shootout on Saturday by a score of 34-27.  The halftime score was a defense-dominated 10-3 in favor of the Sooners.  So, what happened at halftime?  Did both offensive units pound down a bunch of energy drinks or did both defensive units load up on Quaaludes?

Baylor beat Texas Tech 33-30 last week to remain undefeated for the season.

Boise St. beat Hawaii 59-37 last week to remain undefeated.  I had the game OVER 60 in last week’s Six-Pack.  I must say that I did not expect Boise to come that close to taking the game over all by itself.

Appalachian State beat Louisiana-Lafayette 17-7; Appalachian State is undefeated for the year.

Clemson beat Florida State 45-14.  At one point in the second quarter, Clemson had more TDs than Florida State had first downs.  This was an unadulterated beatdown.

Louisville beat Wake Forest 62-59 handing the Demon Deacons their first loss of the season.  The two teams combined for 1188 yards of offense and 121 points here.  There must have been a notation on each team’s schedule that defense was “optional” for this game.

Another team to suffer its first loss of the year was Memphis.  Temple beat Memphis 30-28; four Memphis turnovers in the game led to this loss.  By the way, Temple is a very quiet 5-1 so far this year…

Wisconsin beat Michigan State 38-0.  Folks, Wisconsin has given up only 29 points in 6 games; four of the six wins have been shutouts.  Meanwhile the Badgers have scored 255 points in those 6 wins; the closest game so far was a 24-15 victory over Northwestern.  Wisconsin plays at Ohio State (also undefeated for 2019) next week.  Clear your calendars…

Penn State beat Iowa 17-12 in a defensive slugfest.  By the way, the Penn State defense is very good too.

Minnesota stayed unbeaten with a dominant win over Nebraska 34-7.  The Gophers ran the ball for 322 yards in this game.

Toward the bottom of the Big 10, we find Purdue beating up on Maryland 40-14.  For some perspective here, consider that Penn State held Purdue to minus-30 yards rushing and 93 yards total offense 2 weeks ago.  Last week, Purdue ran the ball for 138 yards and passed for an additional 420 yards.  Put those two sets of stats for the Purdue in juxtaposition if you dare…

Indiana shut out Rutgers 35-0.  Let me try to put this result in perspective too:

  • Indiana’s defense has held 3 opponents under 25 points so far this year.  Those three opponents were Ball St., UConn and E. Illinois (Division 1-AA).
  • Rutgers fired its coach 3 weeks ago.  Since then they have lost to Maryland by 41 points and then suffered this shutout loss by 5 TDs.  Might I suggest – ever so humbly – that the coach was not the problem at Rutgers?

Out west, Arizona State rallied from a 10-point deficit to beat Washington State 38-34.  Herm Edwards has the Sun Devils at 5-1 for the season with Utah, USC and Oregon still on the schedule.  Meanwhile, this is not the first time this year that Washington State has run out to a lead and then surrendered it in a loss.  Remember that UCLA scored 50 points in the second half against the Cougars earlier this year.

Oregon beat Colorado 45-3.  Since losing the opening game of the year to Auburn 27-21, Oregon has given up exactly 1 TD in 5 games.  In this rout, the Ducks registered 4 INTs.

Notre Dame beat USC 30-27 last week.  The Trojans rallied for 2 TDs in the 4th quarter to make the game look closer than it was.  That rally also made one of last week’s Six-Pack picks into a loser.  The Irish ran the ball for 308 yards in this contest.

Rice had the week off; so, it remains winless for the season.  Both Akron and New Mexico State lost last week; they too have yet to win a game in 2019.

Louisiana Tech beat UMass 69-21.  UMass came to the game with the worst scoring defense in the nation yielding more than 46 points per game.  And last week, made that stat even worse…


College Games of Interest:


Going into the games for this weekend, the Big 10 has 4 teams with 6-0 records.  According to, the last time that happened was in 1906 and one of the teams that was undefeated then was the University of Chicago Maroons coached by Amos Alonzo Stagg.  One needs to be a football historian – or a trivia geek – to know that Chicago was one of the founding members of the Big 10 and ceded its place to Michigan State about 100 years ago with “rights of recall”.  Not a lot of danger that Chicago would want to take up football at the Big 10 level of competition any time soon…

(Fri Nite) Ohio State – 28 at Northwestern (49):  Only real hope for the Wildcats here is for Ohio State to be looking ahead to next week’s showdown with Wisconsin.

Wisconsin – 31 at Illinois (51):  Only real hope for the Illini here is for Wisconsin to be looking ahead to next week’s show down with Ohio State.

Clemson – 23.5 at Louisville (61):  The Cardinals put 62 points on the scoreboard last week against Wake Forest.  They will probably not score one-third of that total in this game.

Buffalo – 17 at Akron (48):  Akron seeks its first win here…

Rice – 4.5 at Texas-San Antonio (46.5):  Rice is winless this year and they are favored on the road in this game.  Does that tell you something about the esteem in which the oddsmakers hold UTSA?

Indiana – 5.5 at Maryland (59):  Indiana pitched a shutout last week and Maryland got steamrollered last week.  Who knows what might happen here?  Oh, and who cares?

Florida State at Wake Forest – 2 (69):  Wake Forest scored 59 points last week and lost the game.  That should be a wake-up call for the Florida State offense.

Purdue at Iowa – 17 (48):  Iowa is a tough place for visiting teams; this should be a low-scoring affair.

Boise St. – 7 at BYU (46.5):  Boise St. is undefeated, and they take a week off from conference play to face a serious challenge to their undefeated status.

Arizona St. at Utah – 13.5 (45):  This is an important game in the race for the PAC-12 South.  I agree with the oddsmaker here; this will be a low-scoring game.  I think the line is fat given that the Sun Devils have only lost once this year.  I’ll put Arizona St. plus the points in this week’s Six-Pack even on the road.

Oregon – 3 at Washington (49.5):  Both of these teams have intra-state rivalries and those games draw plenty of attention and publicity.  However, this rivalry is as intense as those intra-state games.  Oregon is undefeated in PAC-12 games; Washington is 2-2 in PAC-12 games.  The Huskies are all but eliminated from the PAC-12 North title and a loss here would shovel the dirt in on the coffin.  I like Oregon to win and cover here based on the strength of the Oregon defense, so I’ll put Oregon in this week’s Six-Pack.

Florida – 4 at S. Carolina (48):  The Gators are coming off their loss to LSU and the Gamecocks are coming off a huge road win over Georgia.  This could be a blowout game in either direction.  I think S. Carolina suffers a let-down game here.  I’ll put Florida to win and cover in this week’s Six-Pack.

LSU – 18 at Mississippi St. (61):  Mississippi St. is always tough at home and often pull a huge upset over a highly ranked rival in that venue.  Having said that, I don’t think that is going to happen here.  LSU has a significant edge in talent here.

Tennessee at Alabama – 34 (61):  This is gonna be a spanking…

Baylor at Oklahoma St. – 4 (68.5):  Baylor is undefeated this year and is a road underdog; Oklahoma St. is a tough out in Stillwater.  Also, it is Homecoming Weekend for OK St…

Minnesota – 28 at Rutgers (47.5):  Minnesota maintains its status as an undefeated team on the road this week.  Rutgers has been shut out 3 times this year – every other game on the schedule.  Rutgers is 0-4 against Big 10 opponents losing by a combined score of 165-7.

Missouri – 21 at Vandy (56.5):  It is Homecoming Weekend for the Commodores, but I don’t think the alums will be smiling too much after this game.

Temple at SMU – 7 (60):  Last week, Temple knocked off undefeated AAC foe, Memphis.  This week they face another undefeated AAC opponent.

Michigan at Penn St. – 9 (47):  Penn St. is undefeated, and Michigan has lost only once.  Both are in the thick of the Big 10 East race at this point, but the loser will be in deep water.  Call this one the Game of the Week.


NFL Commentary:


Three of the top teams in the NFL so far this year are the Ravens, Patriots and the Niners.  In addition to their gaudy records, it is fair to say that none of the three have gone through the toughest part of their schedule yet.  Let’s take a look…

The Ravens are 4-2 with wins over the Dolphins, Cardinals, Steelers and Bengals.  The losses came at the hands of the Chiefs and the Browns.  So, what has the schedule-maker put on the back end of the Ravens calendar?

  • At Seahawks
  • BYE Week
  • Vs Patriots
  • At Bengals
  • Vs. Texans
  • At Rams
  • Vs. Niners
  • At Bills
  • Vs Jets
  • At Browns
  • Vs Steelers

The Patriots are undefeated at 6-0; their opponents to date have been a motley crew other than one game against the Bills in Buffalo.  Now comes the interesting part of the Pats’ schedule.

  • At Jets
  • Vs Browns
  • At Ravens
  • BYE Week
  • At Eagles
  • Vs Cowboys
  • At Texans
  • Vs Chiefs
  • At Bengals
  • Vs Bills
  • Vs Dolphins

The Niners are likewise undefeated in 2019 with a 5-0 record; they have already had their BYE Week.  So, what’s next?

  • At Skins
  • Vs Panthers
  • At Cardinals
  • Vs Seahawks
  • Vs Cardinals
  • Vs Packers
  • At Ravens
  • At Saints
  • Vs Falcons
  • Vs Rams
  • At Seahawks

The Ravens, Pats and Niners will be tested more severely from here to the end of December than they have been to date…

After the Cowboys lost to the Jets last week – details later – both Dez Bryant and Terrell Owens criticized Jason Garrett and tried to pin the loss on him.  Remember when your Mom told you that you were known by the company you keep?  Well, the obverse can be true also.  Sometimes, the people who are against you speak eloquently to your credit.  Personally, I take the criticism(s) from Bryant and Owens as an endorsement for Jason Garrett.

I discussed the Packers’ win over the Lions in a Topical Rant earlier this week.  That game was not one that will likely be immortalized by NFL Films.

In last week’s Bagel Bowl where two winless teams sought to shed that label, the Skins beat the Dolphins 17-16.  Earlier in the week, the Dolphins’ coaching staff anointed Josh Rosen as the starting QB for the rest of the season.  Indeed, he started the game; but the coaches pulled him in favor of Ryan Fitzpatrick in medias res.  A late two-touchdown rally by the Dolphins turned this into a nail-biter that ended with the Dolphins missing a 2-point conversion with only 6 seconds left on the clock.

Brad Dickson had this comment relative to the Skins’ game under their new interim head coach:

“You know unemployment is low when Bill Callahan gets a head coaching job.”

The Panthers beat the Bucs 37-26 in London.  The Panthers defense dominated this game with 7 sacks and 5 INTs.  With those stats, it is surprising that the Bucs scored 26 points.

The Seahawks rallied to beat the Browns 32-28.  The Browns had a 2 TD lead in the first half of this game and coughed it up.  Four Browns’ turnovers – including 3 INTs by Baker Mayfield – enabled the Seahawks’ comeback.  The Seahawks ran for 170 yards in the game and Russell Wilson threw 2 TDs – and scored a running TD on his own – to fuel the comeback.

The Vikes beat the Eagles 38-20.  The Eagles’ defense was a no-show last week allowing the Vikes 447 yards on offense.  Oh wait, The Vikes just scored another long TD over Rasul Douglas as I was typing that last sentence.

The Ravens beat the Bengals 23-17 last week.  The Bengals were competitive here, but they are still looking for their first win in 2019.  They played hard and they were in the game to the end.  Bengals’ WR, Auden Tate, had a breakout game – 5 receptions for 95 yards. In the end, though, this was just the Bengals being the Bengals and playing just poorly enough to lose.  The Bengals are a very bad NFL team right now.

The Saints beat the Jags 13-6.  The Saints’ defense limited the Jags to 226 yards total offense.

The Niners beat the Rams 20-7.  This was not the OVER 50 I predicted in last week’s Six-Pack but the Niners remain unbeaten.  The Niners’ defense stopped the Rams 4 times on 4th down in the game.  Jared Goff registered 78 yards passing in the game, and the Rams only totaled 157 yards on offense.  Holding the Rams to that low an output was thought to be as impossible as breaking the 4-minute mile once was.   The Rams tried to get a first down on third down or fourth down 13 times in this game; they converted ZERO of those attempts.

  • [Aside:  Do not think that only the Chargers’ fans in LA are not all that enthusiastic about their team.  The Niners had at least 40% of the LA Coliseum on their side for this game.  Front-running LA fans ought to be climbing all over the Rams in 2019 after a Super Bowl appearance as the climax to last year’s schedule; but they are not…]

The Texans beat the Chiefs 31-24 last week.  The Chiefs’ defense needs help – lots of help.  It gave up 192 yards rushing in this game.  The Texans and the Colts look like the class of the AFC South and should be battling it out for the rest of the season – – starting with a matchup this week.

The Broncos shut out the Titans 16-0 last week.  The Titans are not an offensive juggernaut but getting shut out by a Denver defense that has had problems of its own this year is pathetic.  Marcus Mariota was 7-18 for 63 yards and 2 INTs when he got pulled in favor of Ryan Tannehill.  The Broncos’ defense had 7 sacks in the game.

The Titans need to make a decision about their QB. Marcus Mariota’s contract is up at the end of the year; Ryan Tannehill probably isn’t the long-term answer under center. So, are the Titans ready to commit to Mariota?  Or should they go free-agent QB shopping?  Or can they find a QB in the draft?  The Titans’ defense is solid, but they need increased production on a consistent basis from the offense – – and that has not been forthcoming for a couple of seasons now.

The Jets beat the Cowboys 24-22.  The Jets’ offense looked competent with Sam Darnold on the field.  They were not an offensive juggernaut, but they were not a liability when they were on the field.  The Jets had been averaging a pathetic 179 yards on offense with Darnold in street clothes; in this game they had 338 yards on offense.  That’s not great but it is an 89% increase in productivity.  The Jets’ defense was harassing all day long; Dak Prescott was hammered more than a few times.  The Cowboys have now lost 3 in a row; this is the third straight game where they did not score a TD in the first half of the game.

The Cardinals beat the Falcons 34-33 last week.  The reason Dan Quinn was hired by the Falcons in the first place was his stature as a defensive guru.  In 2019, the Falcons rank 26th in the NFL in yards allowed per game at 388.8.  Last week, Kyler Murray threw for 340 yards and 3 TDs against the Falcons’ defense.  Matt Ryan had a stat line that should have belonged to a winning QB and not a losing one:

  • 30 for 36 for 356 yards with 4 TDs and 0 INTs

The margin of defeat for the Falcons was a missed PAT by Matt Bryant.  Having said that, Bryant is not responsible for the loss here.

The Patriots dominated the Giants 35-14 last week.  The Pats gave up their first passing TD of the year in the game.  I guess Giants’ fans can count that as a bight spot for the Giants.  The Pats do need to get better at WR – – through a trade or through the healing of Josh Gordon and his leg injuries.  Take your pick…

The Steelers beat the Chargers 24-17.  This game was not nearly as close as the score appears; the Steelers dominated from the start.  Melvin Gordon only gained 18 yards on the ground here; the Steelers’ defense was suffocating.  The Steelers won this game on the road playing their 3rd string QB.  Now, the Steelers get a welcome scheduling respite.  They have their BYE Week followed by a game against the sorry-assed Dolphins

  • Memo to Steelers’ Coaches and Players:  You must not squander this scheduling largesse…

Even though this game was in LA, the crowd was clearly pro Steelers.  If you told me that 60% of the fans were wearing “black and gold” for the game, I would concur.  Visiting teams need not fear playing an away game at the Chargers home field..  The Chargers are 1-3 at “home” this year.


NFL Games:


Teams taking a break this week:

  1. Browns:  That hissing sound you hear is all the over-inflated hype that was pumped into balloons for Browns’ fans during the last offseason.
  2. Bucs:  They get time off to decompress from last week’s game in London.  The Bucs record today is 2-4 and their record at home is 0-3.  Interesting…
  3. Panthers:  They too get time off to decompress from last week’s game in London.  The Panthers are hanging in NFC South race only one game behind the Saints.
  4. Steelers:  They won an important game last week with solid defense and a 3rd string QB who did not embarrass himself or the team.  For the longer term, they need Mason Rudolph to clear the concussion protocols

There has been a lot of “line movement” this week in NFL games.  Please do not ask me to explain why…

Arizona at Giants – 3 (50.5):  This spread opened at 1 point and has expanded slowly as the week progressed.  Kyler Murray has had two big games in a row; you can devalue that a bit by pointing out that those games came against the Bengals and Falcons – ranked 29th and 26th respectively in total defense this year.  However, he goes against a Giants’ defense this week that ranks 28th this year.  Why not another big game?  Meanwhile, the 30th ranked Cards’ defense gets to try and stop Daniel Jones…  This is not the Dog-Breath Game of the Week, but it came close to earning that stigma.

Houston at Indy – 1 (47):  The spread opened here with the Texans as a 1-point road favorite.  That flipped over quickly and now the spread has been steady for a couple of days.  This is the Game of the Week between two teams with winning records fighting it out for the lead in their division.  The Texans’ Deshaun Watson has been outstanding for the last couple of weeks – coincidentally the Texans’ O-Line has protected him for those two games.  The Colts have been solid all season long.  The key to the game is the ability of the Texans’ defense to contain the Colts’ running attack; so far this year, the Texans have been solid there ranking 8th in the NFL

Miami at Buffalo – 17 (41):  The Bills come off a BYE Week to host a junior varsity opponent.  There is no way I would take the Dolphins on the road nor is there any way I would lay 17 points with the Bills’ inconsistent offense.  The most interesting aspect of this game to me is this;

  • Will the Dolphins score more than once in the game?

Minnesota – 2 at Detroit (45):  Here is another game where the favorite has flipped; the Lions opened the week as a 1-point favorite.  The Vikes offense has had two good outings in a row (against the Giants and the Eagles); maybe they are on a roll?  The Lions come to the game off a short week after losing to the Packers and the officials on Monday Night.

Oakland at Green Bay – 6 (47):  This spread opened with the Packers as 7.5-point favorites.  Like the Lions, the Packers come to the game off a short work week.  Meanwhile, the Raiders had a BYE last week.  I think there are 2 keys to this game:

  1. Can the Packers run defense stop Josh Jacobs?  The Packers rank 23rd in the league in run defense allowing 124.5 yards per game.
  2. Will the Packers have either Davante Adams or Geronimo Allison – or both – active as WRs?

I’ll put the Raiders plus the points in this week’s Six-Pack.

Jax – 3.5 at Cincy (44):  This is the Dog-Breath Game of the Week.  The Jags were bad enough before they traded Jalen Ramsey away earlier this week.  The Bengals are just plain bad.  The Jags should run the ball all day long; the Bengals surrender an embarrassing 184.5 yards per game.  That is the worst in the NFL by a margin of 14.9 yards per game.

Rams – 3 at Atlanta (55):  Both defenses are suspect here.  Both offenses seem to feast on marginal defenses.  If forced to make a pick here I would play OVER.  Fortunately, I am not forced to do anything, so I’ll pass on that opportunity.

SF – 9.5 at Washington (41) The Total Line opened at 43.5 and has dropped to this level.  No; I do not know why.  Kyle Shanahan may want to rub it in here for the way he and his father were escorted out of town by Danny Boy Snyder and his Enabler-in Chief, Bruce Allen.  Just a hunch, I’ll put the Niners in this week’s Six-Pack and lay the points.

Chargers at Tennessee – 2 (40):  You can find this line from 2.5 points all the way down to 1 point this morning.  The Chargers are just not nearly as good as I thought they might be back in August; the Titans continue to be the most inconsistent team in the league.  Ryan Tannehill starts at QB for the Titans; is that a plus?

Baltimore at Seattle – 3 (49):  If you adhere to the rule of thumb that a home team gets a 3-point advantage, this game would be a “pick-‘em” at a neutral site.  That looks about right to me – but I think the Seahawks enjoy a larger home-field advantage than your garden-variety NFL squad.  Russell Wilson would be my pick for MVP if I had a vote and if the vote were held this morning.  I’ll put the Seahawks to win and cover in this week’s Six-Pack.

New Orleans at Chicago – 3 (38):  I gave this game serious consideration as the Game of the Week.  The Bears just put Kyle Long – their best offensive lineman – and Akiem Hicks – a damned good defensive lineman – on IR.  Moreover, I don’t know who their starting QB is going to be.  Too many unknowns to make a pick here…

(Sun Nite) Philly at Dallas – 3 (49):  If these teams had winning records, this would have been the Game of the Week because it is an important division game and because these teams – channeling Keith Jackson here – just plain don’t like each other.  Amari Cooper may or may not be available; if he does play, he will likely be less than 100%.  In that case, I think the Eagles’ defense should be able to deal with the Cowboys passing attack.  Now, can they also handle Ezekiel Elliott?

(Mon Nite) New England – 9.5 at Jets (42):  Sam Darnold makes a positive difference on offense for the Jets.  He did not play in the first meeting between these two teams.  The Pats had that game so well under control that they played backup Jarret Stidham for the 4th quarter.  I don’t think the Jets can win here, but it will be a much more interesting game than the one back in Week 3.

Let me summarize this week’s Six-Pack:

  1. Arizona St. +13.5 against Utah
  2. Oregon – 3 over Washington
  3. Florida – 4 over South Carolina
  4. Raiders + 6 against Packers
  5. Niners – 9.5 over Skins
  6. Seahawks – 3 over Ravens

Finally, Brad Dickson offered up some courtship advice that is pertinent to NFL football:

“Forty-niners defensive lineman D.J. Jones just proposed to his girlfriend on the sidelines at Monday Night Football. That’s crazy. A proposal should be done in absolute privacy when there’s not a soul around – say, at Thursday Night Football.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………