If you did not like the Alabama/Clemson game on Monday night for the College Football Championship, you must not like college football. The game featured two excellent teams; the teams played hard on every play; the game was close from start to finish and the outcome was still in doubt in the final minute of the game; there were excellent showings by excellent players on both teams. I can understand your not liking the outcome of the game if:
-
You had Alabama minus-7 points and lost on the backdoor cover at the end.
You are a student at or an alum of Clemson University.
You are a student at or an alum of Auburn University.
You think Nick Saban and/or Lane Kiffin are the Devil’s spawn.
However, I do not see how you can like college football and not have enjoyed watching that game.
Congratulations to both teams and to both coaching staffs. And congratulations to the folks who set up the College Football Playoff and set things up such that these two teams could be in a position to play one another for the championship. The current playoff system may not be perfect, but it is much better than the BCS which preceded it and a light-year better than the bowl games followed by polling which preceded the BCS.
In another aspect of college football, the Austin Business Journal reports that the University of Texas nearly doubled its concessions revenue at football games this year because for the first time they sold beer in the stadium. Fans bought beer to the tune of $1.8M for the six games played at Darrel Royal-Texas Memorial stadium this year. That is a lot of suds considering that a significant fraction of the fans in attendance are not – you know – legally allowed to purchase, possess or consume beer.
That same report said that Texas took down a profit of $812,798 from the $1.8M in sales. Here is the upshot as I see it:
-
Texas will not be “re-thinking” or “re-evaluating” this decision any time soon.
Other universities will be introducing this new convenience to their fans in the not-so-distant future.
Switching gears and sports, there are reports that the Brooklyn Nets are trolling John Calipari to come to Brooklyn to be the Head Coach and Grand Vizier of All Things Basketball for the franchise. Only a couple of months ago, there were similar reports saying that the Sacramento Kings were similarly fishing for Calipari. For all I know, those reports may have been planted by Calipari’s agent to see what sort of “action” it might stir up. Or, all of this might be nonsense…
In any event, the current reports regarding the Nets say that Calipari might think about making a switch if the Nets started their offer at 10 years and $120M. If other reporting is correct, this would be about a 50% raise from what his total package is worth at Kentucky. The thinking that is attributed to the owners who want to lure Calipari away from Kentucky is that he coached a lot of really good young NBA players at Kentucky and therefore he might have an inside track to get them to sign with Coach Cal’s team once they hit free agency. Who knows? That may actually be what the owners are thinking…
In addition to my faulty mind-reading skills, I am loath to try to figure out what sort of basketball-related reasoning might be percolating in the minds of either Kings’ owner, Vivek Ranadivé, or Nets’ owner, Mikhail Prokhorov. Without going through a list of questionable basketball decisions/pronouncements from either owner, let me just say that I might not be alone in questioning their “basketball acumen”.
What could get interesting here is if Calipari and his agent somehow get these two owners to start bidding against one another to get “Coach Cal”. Phil Jackson reportedly gets $12M per year from the Knicks in a 5-year deal; Jackson’s credentials include enough championship rings to require a wheelbarrow to haul them around; if those two uber-rich owners get into a bidding war for Calipari and that bidding war turns into an ego-battle, I wonder how far beyond $12-million a year they might be willing to go…
In any event, Bob Molinaro had this comment in the Hampton Roads Virginian-Pilot recently regarding another time in John Calipari’s career:
“Questionable: From the What Are People Thinking Dept. comes news that UMass threw a two-day celebration this week for John Calipari, the rule breaker who took the school to the 1996 Final Four, only to have the team’s place vacated by the NCAA. The school is hanging a banner for Calipari in the gym rafters, a gesture normal people are not expected to understand.”
In one other NBA note, I think that the combination of the “Kobe Bryant Farewell Tour Across America” coupled with the obviously bad season Kobe is having in his final go-round is covering up something else. Flying under the radar so to speak is how bad some of the other Lakers’ players are playing. The team is obviously a mess; this morning, their record is 8-31 and they are a measly 28.5 games out of first place in the Pacific Division. Not all of that is Kobe Bryant’s fault. Consider:
-
Roy Hibbert has started every game. He is shooting just under 43% from the field; remember he is 7’ 2” tall so he ought to be getting a bunch of dunks and 2-foot shots. Even worse, he is pulling down less than 6 rebounds per game. Hibbert is only 29 years old; he should be in the prime of his career.
Julius Randle has started about half of the games. He is shooting 40% from the field. To his credit, he gets 11.5 rebounds per game but he turns the ball over about twice per game.
DeAngelo Russell has started about half of the games. He too is shooting 40% from the field; he turns the ball over a bit more than twice per game; he does lead the team in assists with 3.2 assists per game. [The fact that 3.2 assists per game leads the team speaks volumes with regard to the style of play out there in LA.]
Finally, since I mentioned beer sales above, here is an item from Dwight Perry’s column, Sideline Chatter, in the Seattle Times:
“A 19-year-old named Bud Weisser was arrested for trespassing at the Budweiser brewery in St. Louis.
“Coincidence? Every Jack Daniels in town is suddenly under police surveillance in Lynchburg, Tenn.”
But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………
Considering Calipari already coaches professional teams at Kentucky, the transition to the Nets ought to be easy. The only problem is the Net’s talent won’t be as good!
david egbert:
Recruiting at Kentucky is a lot easier than “recruiting” in the NBA with things like that pesky salary cap and such…
Oakland Raiders took a fan poll. Lane Kiffin is the Devil’s spawn.
Tenacious P:
Ergo, fans in the Black Hole probably did not like the outcome of the Alabama/Clemson game…
Coaching the Nets, where he would eventually be reviled by at least half the fans and most of the media, or coaching the Cats and remain a “God” throughout Kentucky. And the pay difference isn’t significant. Oh, and he can remain a winner in Kentucky. Hmmm….
Doug:
I did not say that I thought Calipari ought to take the job. After all, he reportedly makes $8M a year (total) at Kentucky and he can stay there about as long as he wants to stay there considering that the NCAA basketball system is set up to allow him to put excellent teams on the court year upon year upon … I really do not think he and his family cannot survive on a mere $8M per – – Latrell Spreewell notwithstanding.