Shades Of Lying…

I was reading an Internet message board yesterday and a “debate” was raging about the severity – or lack thereof – regarding the punishment meted out to Urban Meyer.  That sort of debate is futile and feckless; no amount of Internet gnashing of teeth is going to change it.  However, there was an interesting eddy current in that “debate” wherein proponents of the punishment as it stands and opponents squared off.

  • A key element of this “eddy current” had to do with the less-than-truthful statements Urban Meyer made to the folks at Big 10 media day and then to investigators.
  • Meyer’s proponents argued that he did not “deliberately lie” in these situations.

Since I do not have a dog in that fight – and I recognize that none of my spleen-venting would change even an iota of the outcome there – I read the arguments and counter-arguments for what they were and took them to be what the writer intended.  And then I asked myself this question:

  • Is there really a difference between “lying” and “deliberately lying”?
  • Can one lie about something “accidentally” or is an “accidental lie” just giving the wrong answer to a question or making an incorrect statement?

Brad Dickson, formerly with the Omaha World-Herald had this Tweet regarding the bottom line for the Urban Meyer Saga:

“Breaking news: Urban Meyer has been suspended for almost as long as the average booth review takes.”

Enough of that stuff for the day; the weekend is coming; no one needs to encumber one’s cerebral cortex with that kind of nonsense.  So, let me turn now to something far sillier.  Last night, there was a headline on an article at CBSSports.com that read:

  • Terrell Owens is still ripped and can outsprint P.K. Subban

For those who are not of a hockey persuasion, P.K. Subban is a very good NHL player.  And that headline is about content-free as this one might be if any headline writer were dumb enough to write it:

  • 70-year old Bobby Orr can still skate backward faster than Terrell Owens

[Aside: And I’ll bet 60-year old Jerry Bailey can ride a thoroughbred better than T.O. too…]

The Tiger Woods/Phil Mickelson winner-take-all match play contest will happen on Thanksgiving weekend.   I have already stated that I have no interest in watching two fading stars go at one another to see which of them is the “least-worst” on a given day and that the “winner take all aspect” of this match would be a lot more meaningful if each of them were putting up the millions of dollars in the kitty out of their own funds.  It should not be news to anyone that the funding for this event will not be as I just described…

There is something more going on here.  This is going to be a pay-per-view event.  So, the golf-goofs who want to see this nonsense are going to have to fork over their own money to watch it.  And I doubt that any of them are going to give this consideration as they decide if they are going to pay whatever the cost of the pay-per-view is:

  • TNT is putting up $9M plus production costs for this event.  If TNT makes money on this, they will be motivated to find other “golf properties” to put out there as pay-per-view events.
  • Once they exhaust all the match-play pairings that even the golf-goofs would care about, why not put the US Open on TV in pay-per-view mode?
  • Don’t tell me this can’t happen.  That is exactly what happened with boxing.  First, only heavyweight championship bouts were pay-per-view; then Marvin Hagler, Tommy Hearns, Sugar Ray Leonard and Roberto Duran came along…

The folks who pay to watch this are playing with fire…

The NCAA has ditched the RPI – the Rating Percentage Index – as a tool for deciding which college basketball teams get seeded into March Madness.  The RPI was created about 40 years ago and it has drawn fire from many quadrants over the years; now it is history. The NCAA has replaced it with NET – the NCAA Evaluation Tool.  Components of the NET scoring include:

  • Game results (straight up wins and losses)
  • Game location
  • Strength of schedule
  • Quality of both wins and losses
  • Net offensive and defensive efficiency – – AND – –
  • Scoring margin.

Hold on there, Hoss…  Is the NCAA going to incentivize teams to run up the score in cupcake games to enhance their NET scoring?  Fortunately, when you look a tad closer to the details here, scoring margin will count – – up to score differentials of 10 points.  So, it will not matter if One-And-Done University beats Disco Tech by 45 points or 55 points in a December game.  In the end, the NCAA Selection Committee will also take these factors into account when making the final decisions on inclusion or exclusion from March Madness;

  • Player/coach availability – – Did the most dominant player break an ankle a week before the regular season ended?
  • Teams’ road records – – Remember, March Madness games are supposedly not home games…
  • Head-to-head results when available and common opponent results when available.
  • Conference records

All of this sounds like a major step up in terms of the quality of the selections that will emanate from the Selection Committee next March.  Call me a skeptic, but even if all of this data were presented openly and the full deliberations of the Committee were broadcast in real time, there will still be screams on the Monday after Selection Sunday over “who got snubbed”.

Finally, Brad Rock has this comment in the Deseret News recently about former college basketball hero, Jimmer Fredette – now plying his trade in the Chinese Basketball Association:

“Jimmermaniacs are demanding Fredette get another shot at the NBA, despite the fact he’s 29.

“But don’t plan on it. Chinese officials are threatening a 25 percent tariff if he returns to the United States.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

The End Of The Urban Meyer Saga?

Obviously, the sports “issue of the moment” is the resolution of the Urban Meyer Saga at Ohio State.  Meyer will not lose his job as many suggested he would; Ohio State will suspend him for 3 games.  While this decision and action should bring closure to the issue, I suspect it will not.  There are folks who have looked at the summary report presented to the powers that be at THE Ohio State University and wonder two things:

  1. Since the report says that Urban Meyer issued reprimands and warnings [Note the plural nouns there.] to Zach Smith for a laundry list of improper and potentially illegal actions, how did Coach Meyer get off so lightly?
  2. If this sort of smarmy behavior can go on inside the Athletic Department for years without coming to light, what sort of oversight exists there to assure that behaviors in that department rise to the level of “human”?

The answer to the first question is either cynical or realistic – – depending on how intensely you want to see Urban Meyer fired for all of this.  He got off “so easy” because he is an elite football coach who wins lots of games and brings lots of money into THE Ohio State University.  No one will convince me that if Urban Meyer had a sub-.500 record over the past 3 seasons there, he would still be on the job today.

The answer to the second question is saddening.  There is no adult supervision within the Athletic Department if you include in the definition of “adult supervision” the recognition of common decent behavior that must be exhibited by anyone who is in the Athletic Department and wishes to remain in the Athletic Department.

Even the 3-game suspension is nuanced.  Coach Meyer cannot be with the team at all until after the first game – – against Oregon St.  Then, he can “coach ‘em up” during the weeks leading up to Games 2 and 3 – – Rutgers and TCU – – but cannot be on the sidelines on Saturday afternoon.  Let’s just say it is something short of a 3-week banishment from the team.

Let me go on the record here with a statement:

  • Lest anyone think that I am picking on THE Ohio State University here, I am not.  I would not be surprised to learn that similar sub-human behaviors exist in other Athletic Departments and that they have gone unchecked and been hidden away in those other Athletic Departments.

Oh, and one final question comes to my mind today:

  • Given what the pooh-bahs at THE Ohio State University know now, why did they not also announce that they have turned all of their findings over to the gendarmes so that there can be a criminal investigation of their findings?  Without that action, how have they discharged their obligations?

Enough of that nonsense; let me get down to some REAL nonsense.  Richie Incognito is back in the news; and not surprisingly, there is fundamental weirdness to the story.  Just for giggles, let me hit a few of the high notes of previous instances where Richie Incognito has been in the headlines:

  • Back in college, Incognito demonstrated “anger management issues” including fights with teammates and spitting on opponents.
  • He was identified by ESPN as a major actor in the bullying of teammate Jonathan Martin with the Dolphins.  Even after an NFL-sponsored investigation into that matter, there are still plenty of loose ends there.
  • Several months ago, Incognito was involved in an incident at a health club in Florida where he allegedly threw a dumbbell at someone in the gym.  Police categorized him as being in an “altered paranoid state” and held him on an “involuntary psychiatric hold”.

This week, Richie Incognito was arrested yet again.  This time he was arrested at a funeral home in Arizona where his recently deceased father was about to be cremated.  In the midst of an altercation, he allegedly threatened people at the funeral home and told them he had a truck full of guns outside.  Truth be told, he did have a bunch of guns in his truck and they were legally his and he had permits to carry them.  There was not a “weapons offense” involved here, but I think it is fair to say that mortuaries are not normally places where those sorts of behaviors manifest themselves.  Here is a link to the ESPN story of the most recent arrest; trust me, I have only hit the highlights here; there was a lot more “weirdness on display”.

Yesterday, I ran across an article that said the Washington Nationals’ hugely disappointing season this year was a “vindication for Dusty Baker”.  Look, I get it; the baseball media loves Dusty Baker and I have no reason to believe that he is any kind of “bad guy”.  But the fact that the Nats have so hugely underachieved in 2018 does not “vindicate” Baker for the Nats’ playoff collapses in previous years.

Since 2011, the Nationals have had 4 managers – Davey Johnson, Matt Williams, Dusty Baker and Dave Martinez.  Those four managers have all had top shelf rosters with the likes of Bryce Harper, Jayson Werth, Ryan Zimmerman, Ian Desmond, Gio Gonzales, Stephen Strasburg, Max Scherzer, Anthony Rendon and Trea Turner – – just off the top of my head.  None of those four managers could win a playoff series with those players.  The fact that the current manager – Dave Martinez – is doing worse in the regular season than others did before him does not “vindicate him”.  It does lead one to suspect that there may be organizational problems with the Nats that go beyond the roster – – but even if that were proven conclusively that would not “vindicate Dusty Baker”.

Finally, here is a comment on baseball and hygiene from Brad Rock in the Deseret News:

“Two Major League pitchers have reportedly come down with hand, foot and mouth disease.

“You just knew all that tugging and scratching in baseball was eventually going to turn into something bad.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

Justice Is Served

Today is “Justice Day” here in Curmudgeon Central.  This is a day where bad behavior and poor judgement get what they deserve, and that situation exists in – of all places – the WNBA Playoffs.  [Yes, I know; I had to look it up too.  The WNBA regular season ended.]  The rendition of justice there is this:

  • The Las Vegas Aces – – known in these parts as the Las Vegas Asses – – missed the playoffs by a single game.  Recall that the players chose to pull a no-show for a game here in DC because they had a terrible 24-hour travel experience to get here for the game.  They arrived about 5 hours before game time but chose to “sleep in” instead of playing that night.  The league office declared the game a forfeit – after several days of deliberation.  [Duh!]

Maybe the Asses would have lost that game to the Washington Mystics – – but just maybe they could have won that game; and in that circumstance, they would have earned a “play-in game” for the WNBA Playoffs.  The epitaph for the Las Vegas Asses’ 2018 season ought to be one of Vince Lombardi’s famous quotes:

“Winners never quit, and quitters never win.”

ESPN will have a totally reconstructed 3-man announcing team for Monday Night Football this year.  Joe Tessitore takes over the play-by-play duties from Sean McDonough.  While these two guys have very different styles when it comes to calling a game, I think both of them are solid pros.  Tessitore will sometimes take his call a bit over the top but substituting one for the other here is neither a great leap forward nor a step backward.  Call this move a lateral arabesque…

The departure of Jon Gruden from the ESPN airwaves brought smiles and serenity into Curmudgeon Central.  My first reaction was that the suits at ESPN had to take a step up the announcing ladder when naming his replacement and that I would probably never have to hit the mute button while watching MNF again.  As we move toward the season – and with a VERY small sample size to go on – I think the ESPN suits have succeeded here.

Jason Witten will be one of the game analysts.  Like his pal and former teammate, Tony Romo, Witten will make the jump from NFL player to high level network analyst with no stops in between.  That model worked very well for Tony Romo at CBS last season; I heard Witten in his first game live on the air and he was good enough for a “debut performance”.  [Aside:  He needed this Exhibition Game in the booth far more than he needed any Exhibition Game on the field in prior years.]

The “third man in the booth” is sort of a misnomer.  Booger McFarland will be that “third voice you hear” but he will not be in the booth.  Rather, he will be riding the sidelines in what ESPN calls “The Booger Mobile” which is a motorized cart that can amble up and down the sidelines to give Booger a field-level/close-up view of the action.  Take the cart away and this is reminiscent of the way Tony Siragusa used to work NFL games for Fox.  I’ll reserve judgment on “The Booger Mobile” as an asset to the telecast or just a gimmick for a while but I will say this:

  • After listening to Booger McFarland on ESPN Radio programs and on studio shows related to college football on ESPN and ESPN2, I think he has a chance to be the star of this team.  He is articulate and he has a quick wit – two important traits for a football color analyst.  Most importantly, he seems not to be full of himself which means he will not likely grate on viewers’ nerves.

I think NFL fans can look forward to MNF this year.  Checking out the new announcing team will be an interesting undertaking plus the NFL seems to have upgraded the schedule of games played on Monday night.  I will grant you that the first game of the year on MNF is not particularly appetizing – – Jets and Lions – – but late game for Week 1 on MNF will be the Rams and the Raiders and that game should be interesting from several angles.  Here is a link to the full Monday Night Football schedule for 2018.

I cannot possibly claim to be a serious follower of professional golf, so I will present here a stat sent to me by a former colleague who is a serious follower of professional golf and “golf history”:

“When Brooks Koepka won the US Open and the PGA Championship this year, he earned more prize money there than Arnold Palmer plus Gary Player earned in their careers combined.”

There you have a clear demonstration of the growth of sporting enterprises over the last 50 years and the amounts of money that sponsors are willing to put into sporting enterprises in terms of advertising and promotion.

Recently, I wrote here that the Washington Nationals’ season of underachievement was due in part to a coddling atmosphere surrounding the team.  Yesterday, the Nats traded away two of their players for nothing more than money to offset some of the luxury tax they will pay for the 2018 season.  Various commentators have concluded that the Nats are throwing in the towel on this season and have begun their roster strategizing for 2019.   As of this morning, the Nats are 63-63 which is mediocre by any standard and which is seriously short of expectations for a team that is well into the luxury tax zone in terms of its payroll.  More importantly, the Nats have only the 9th best record in the National League.

The players the Nats traded away – Daniel Murphy and Matt Adams – are not prime offenders in terms of lackadaisical play and both wound up with teams well ahead of the Nats in the standings.  (Murphy to the Cubs and Adams to the Cardinals) What the Nats need to do is to ask themselves why they found themselves in this situation given the talent on this year’s roster – especially as compared to the talent on the rosters of a few of the teams above them in the standings.  Once the team braintrust focuses on that aspect of the 2018 debacle, they might be able to figure out how to avoid another season like this one after they go out and spend plenty of money to assemble a new cast of characters.

Finally, speaking of baseball teams having disastrous seasons in 2018, consider this comment from Dwight Perry of the Seattle Times:

“Smithfield Foods has been ordered to pay $470 million to neighbors for the smell from a hog farm.

“Don’t go getting any ideas there, Oriole fans!”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

When It Rains, It Pours

Cleveland Browns’ WR, Josh Gordon, just arrived in training camp.  To say that Gordon has had an “unorthodox career” to date would be akin to saying that Frank Sinatra “could sing a little”.  Here are a few summary items:

  • Browns drafted him out of Baylor in 2013.  There were a couple of drug-related issues in his college days and they must have been more than trivial because he was suspended indefinitely by Baylor coach, Art Briles, who is not exactly known to be a heavy-handed disciplinarian.
  • Gordon played well for two years and looked as if he would be a franchise cornerstone; made the All-Pro team after his second season in Cleveland.
  • Unfortunately, Gordon has been suspended on multiple occasions for violating the NFL Substance Abuse Policy.  Partially through the 2014 season, he failed another test and was suspended “indefinitely”.
  • He was finally reinstated in the middle of the 2017 season.
  • He was late to training camp this year because he was involved in counseling regarding anxiety issues and his continuing drug/alcohol rehab process.  When he went into that counseling program, he said that it was a necessary step for him in his “overall wellness program”.

I mention all that history and baggage because Josh Gordon seems to be the embodiment of the old saying, “When it rains, it pours.”  According to reporting by TMZ, Gordon is under a court order to pay $6500 per month in child support and that he missed his first payment date on 1 August.  According to that TMZ report, Gordon could face 30 days in jail for his first violation of that court order and then 60 days for a second violation and then 90 days …

When Gordon arrived in the Browns’ training camp last week, this is what he had to say:

“I realize in order for me to reach my full potential my primary focus must remain on my sobriety and mental well-being. Let’s get to work!”

Josh Gordon is now 28 years old.  I hope that his rehab program has gotten him to a point of self-realization that maintaining his focus on his sobriety is important to more than just him reaching his potential as a football player.

We shall see …  Bonne chance, Josh Gordon.

If you are a believer in that ethereal concept labeled as “team chemistry”, you probably want to keep your eyes on the LA Rams this year.  To extend the metaphor, the Rams have donned their white lab coats and have begun experimenting with volatile ingredients by mixing them up and putting them in the same beaker.  What happens next …?

In the off-season, the Rams went out and acquired three players who – generously – can be called “testy”.

  1. The Rams got CB, Marcus Peters, from the Chiefs.  You may recall that Peters is the player who lost control to the point that he picked up an official’s penalty flag and threw it into the stands in the late stages of a game last year.  Let’s just say he did not win the “Mr. Poise Award” for that weekend…
  2. The Rams signed Ndamukong Suh from the Dolphins.  Suh is well-known for violent outbursts on the field at times and for completely lackadaisical play at other times.  Amazingly, sometimes these extreme behaviors are on display in the same defensive series.
  3. The Rams signed Aqib Talib from the Broncos.  Talib has been in the NFL 9 seasons and this is his 4th team.  That is a bit unusual for a guy who has been a Pro Bowl selection 5 times and an All-Pro selection twice.  Talib’s off-field interactions with various members of various police forces have not always been totally positive.

Make no mistake, all three of these players are way better than average players on defense.  At the same time, recognize that each of the three has shown himself to be a “handful” in the past.  Sean McVay and defensive coordinator, Wade Phillips, have all three of them to deal with at one time.  If they keep things under control, the Rams’ defense could be outstanding this year; if the “team chemistry experiment” gets out of control, it could be interesting to watch – – from afar.

If my reading of the contract terms for the Patriots is correct, I believe that the team has 20 players who would have made more money in 2018 than Tom Brady – – before the Pats added 5 incentive clauses to his contract a few weeks ago.  On the assumption that Brady earns the $5M attached to the 5 incentive clauses – and he did surpass all those criteria in 2017 so that is not an absurd assumption – then there would only be 9 players on the roster who would make more money than he will in 2018.  Cue Arte Johnson here:

  • Verrrry in-ter-esting…

Finally, speaking obliquely about the New England Patriots, here is a comment from Scott Ostler in the SF Chronicle about the culture of the team:

“Bill Belichick’s postgame-interview look: the dude at your gym waiting impatiently for you to get your wimpy ass off the bench-press machine.

“That Hoodie death-glower, by the way, might be why the Patriots don’t commit many infractions.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

No Surprises Here …

Recently, Scott Ostler wrote in the SF Chronicle:

“Looking over the Warriors’ regular-season schedule, I was shocked and surprised. The NBA is going to make the Warriors play the regular season?”

And in those two statements is the kernel of why I prefer football and baseball to pro basketball.  In the NFL, just about every year, some team that finished last in their division in the previous year finds a way to win that division in that year.  Heck, in 2017, the Eagles went from worst-to-first in the NFC East and then compounded that “rise from the ashes” by going on to win the Super Bowl.  It happens frequently enough in the NFL that we are no longer shocked when it happens again.

Similarly, in MLB, there are always surprise/Cinderella teams that far exceed the expectations and prognostications of the experts.  This year, you can point to the Braves, Phillies, Mariners and the A’s as teams that are in a far better position as we head into the final 6 weeks of the season than just about anyone anticipated.  The fact of the uncertainty makes for greater sustained interest over the seasons in the NFL and MLB.

In the NBA – particularly in this “Era of the Superteam” – a lot of the mystery is wrung out of the season.  Absent a rash of injuries or some sort of tragedy befalling a team like the Golden State Warriors, what sort of a scenario can you imagine whereby they will not be part of the Conference playoffs and most likely one of the teams in the Conference finals?  The Warriors will play 82 games and less than a handful of them will be important games in the overall status of the playoff teams in the Western Conference.

Look at the idea of “worst-to-first” in the NBA and tell me who you like next season to accomplish that feat:

  1. The Brooklyn Nets were 28-54 last year.  They would probably have to reverse those numbers in their record for the upcoming season to win their division.  Does anyone really think that is going to happen?
  2. The Chicago Bulls were 27-55 last year.  Somehow, I do not think a whole lot of folks would expect the Bulls to rever4se the numbers in their record either.
  3. The Atlanta Hawks were 24-58 last year.  Forget winning their division, the Hawks would probably have to increase their number of wins by more than 60% to make the playoffs comfortably as an 8th seed in the Eastern Conference.
  4. The Denver Nuggets were 46-36 last year.  I guess you could look at the numbers and suggest that they might wind up in first place in their division come April 2019.  However, if you look at the teams in their division who finished ahead of the Nuggets, (the Blazers, Thunder, Jazz and Timberwolves), you might not be so anxious to bet the ranch on them wining their division.
  5. The Phoenix Suns were 21-61 last year.  Unless the NBA can find a way for the Suns to play the Washington Generals 30-40 times next year, the Suns are not winning their division.
  6. The Memphis Grizzlies were 22-60 last year.  See the comment above regarding the Suns to see my view of their “road to the playoffs” and their chances of winning their division.

Notwithstanding the scheduling hype and PR surrounding the revelation of the NBA regular season schedule – – which teams will play whom on Christmas Day and how many regular season games will be played in foreign countries next year – – the fact is that the regular season is pretty gruesome fare until about the beginning of March when a few of the teams get serious about every game because they are fighting for that final playoff slot or two and/or they are fighting for advantageous seeding.

FIFA awarded the World Cup Tournament in 2026 to North America.  Games will be played in Mexico, Canada and the US; I believe this is the first time the World Cup will be a “regional event” as opposed to a single country event.  Whatever … that is only marginally interesting.  What I wonder is if these countries will be able to generate a financial windfall for themselves by the fact of hosting the tournament.

In recent times, the World Cup has not been a gigantic moneymaker for the countries that hosted the tournament.  In large measure, that is because countries like Brazil and South Africa had to spend lots of “upfront money” in order to have stadium venues that met FIFA standards and in order to have a sufficient infrastructure to support the games that would be played in those venues.  Building new stadiums and new roads to get to the venues and sufficient hotel accommodations is not cheap.  What happened then was that countries never made up those upfront costs plus the costs of putting on the day-to-day events in the tournament.

The difference for the North American countries is that they have extant stadiums that can be used to host the games.  Some of the stadiums may need minor upgrades and maybe some “spiffing up”, but there will not be a need to build 5 or 6 new stadiums where none exist now.  Similarly, the infrastructure to get players, fans and media to and from all the venues is in place and most – if not all – of the cities that will host games already have plenty of hotel rooms.  So, on the surface, I would expect the North American countries to wind up in the black on this event.  However, I am not an economist…

So, there is a website called The Sports Economist.  As you may expect, this site features economists analyzing issues related to sports and economics.  I figure that the authors there will have a far more reasoned insight into that issue than I do.  So, I used the “Contact Us” feature there to pose this question to the managers of that website.  If or when they provide some analysis that is more detailed and more thoughtful than the one I gave here, I will report back and link you to their thoughts.

Finally, late night comedy host, James Corden had this to say about a new LeBron James entertainment venture:

“HBO recently announced that LeBron James will be hosting a new talk show set in a barbershop in Los Angeles and it’s called ‘The Shop’.  Apparently, LeBron’s talk show is going to be him and four random guests you may or may not have heard of.   You know, like when he plays basketball.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

A Tip Of The Hat To T. S. Eliot

T.S. Eliot said that April was the cruelest month.  I have no comment on that, but I do think that Friday is the cruelest day if one is writing sports essays Monday thru Friday every week.  The good stuff on the clipboard has already been used in the essays from Monday thru Thursday and – truth be told – Thursday night is not a typical time for great new revelations in the sports world.  In case anyone is reading this a few days hence, today is a Friday…

There is a story afoot today based on a report from the NY Post earlier this week.  According to the report, Chris Berman may be back in a “reduced role” with ESPN during the football season this year.  According to the report, all of the wrinkles have not been ironed out yet, but the idea supposedly is:

  • Chris Berman would appear on some SportsCenter programs and other NFL-related programming starting this Fall.
  • More importantly, he would be part of some of ESPN’s NFL Countdown programming between now and the end of the NFL regular season.

Berman is “semi-retired” and has already committed himself to certain events on weekends during this football season.  So, he is not out there as a free agent for ESPN to pick off the vine so to speak.  However, his return to ESPN in a visible role is important for a couple of reasons:

  • NFL Countdown ratings tanked last year when Berman was no longer the “host”/” traffic cop” on the program.  Sam Ponder took Berman’s place and it is never a good career move to follow a legend in a job.  From what I saw, Sam Ponder did a good job – – but she is not Chris Berman and that fact alone cost her some viewers and some credibility.  With him back in a “part-time capacity”, Sam Ponder might get a boost as it may appear that he is handing the baton to her so to speak.
  • NFL Countdown ratings dropped 12% last year as compared to the year before that. One need not be a “TV-genius- in waiting” to recognize that is not a good thing…

ESPN has undergone a lot of personnel turnover in the past couple of years and many of the choices for new “faces of the franchise” have hot worked out all that well.  Recently, ESPN seems to be working to mend fences with some of its popular alumni and to get them back on the air in spot roles.  If Berman comes back, he can join Keith Olbermann as part of the “old-timers’” reunion there.  Berman and Olbermann have a long history together going all the way back to the time when both had recently graduated from college.  It might be very interesting to see the two of then hosting SportsCenter and NFL Prime Time on some weekend this year.

As the NY Post said:

  • Chris Berman may be back … back … back…

There is another angle to NFL news today that is far less uplifting than the idea of Chris Berman to the airwaves.  You must recall that the NFL settled the lawsuit against it regarding concussion injuries and their long-term effects regarding long-retired players.  That settlement was more than $700M.

Well, now it seems as if claims against his escrowed fund are coming in far more frequently and for far more money per claim than had been estimated.  Originally, the thought was that about $400B in claims would be paid out in the first decade after the settlement.  It turns out that just over $500 B has been “settled out” in terms of claims in the first 16 months wherein claims could be filed.  Here are two imperatives that face former NFL players who may or may not want to seek “protection” under these protocols:

  • More than 6,000 former players have undergone the baseline assessment.
  •  Former players become eligible for payment based on the development of certain specific conditions, without having to demonstrate a football-related cause.

I do not want to be a callous hard-ass here, but that second item listed above gives me great pause.  I am not saying that former NFL players have gamed the system or have found ways to “defraud it”, but it sure seems to me as if the recipe for major-league abuse and profiteering is not that difficult to ascertain.

There seems to be a new “buzz phrase” going around for athletes or coaches who asked about the techniques that players may need to employ in order to “achieve their potential”.  This is the sort of pabulum everyone has come to expect from interviews near to or just after NFL teams break camp and head back to their home digs.  That does not make it any more meaningful or interesting to listen to.  Anyhow, the latest “buzz-phrase” that far too many fresh recruits to basketball and football teams have been taught to use as their go-to source of wisdom is this one:

  • Our team [The Fighting Annelids] overcame obstacles that would have given Hercules pause lo those many years ago.
  • Nonetheless, we/they persevered.  So, let us hear from Coach Flabeetz on this matter.
  • Thank you all.  The single most important thing that our student-athletes did during the trials and tribulations of this season is that they “stayed within themselves”.

Holy Checkmate, Batman …  What other choice might those student-athletes have had?  Astral projection to the gridiron on Saturday afternoon?  Well, Caped Crusader, maybe it would not have been worse when considering the outcomes…

Finally, here is an observation by Brad Rock of the Deseret News from back in the time this year when the ESPYs filled time on the airwaves:

“Danica Patrick tweaking LeBron James at the ESPYs: ‘When LeBron hosted, he made fun of me too.  I’d say we’re even.  J.R. Smith would say, ‘We’re up by one’.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

 

Football And Finances Today

Every year when I look at the college football menu of games for a weekend, I often see what I call “Sacrificial Lamb Games”.  Those are the kind where a minor football school gets a million-dollar payday to travel to the stadium of a Top Ten school for a “football game”.  In reality, these are glorified scrimmages; and on one hand, I can understand the financial incentive for the people at Cupcake U to take the game.  On the other hand, I rarely see any benefit in terms of learning or personal growth for the “student-athletes” at Cupcake U who get their brains beat out for 60 minutes of football.

I mention this because a reader sent me a note on Tuesday with a link to an article from Tulsa World Sports Extra.  According to this report – dated 7 August 2018 – the AD at Tulsa University has taken a pay cut and so has the head football coach and the head basketball coach.  These pay cuts have nothing to do with unfulfilled goals on the field or on the court; these pay cuts are caused by the finances in the athletic department.  Derrick Gragg is the AD at Tulsa; here is what he told Tulsa World:

“Basically, the budget reductions to me are a microcosm of what’s going on, not just at TU but across the country at a lot of different places.  We’re like a lot of other athletic departments — we’ve been asked to tighten our belt.

“We approached it with a combination of things. We did have some budget reductions. We did have some head-coaching salary reductions. My salary has been reduced the past three years. That’s the way we’ve dealt with some of that. You don’t want to negatively impact the student-athletes in any way.”

[For the record, Tulsa eliminated its golf team several years ago, so that sort of negatively impacted some of the student-athletes at the time.]

All that aside, this situation explains to me why a school like Tulsa might be more than willing to take a game or two against opponents where Tulsa has no chance to be competitive – – so long as there is a million-dollar payday attached to that shellacking.  Here is a link to the report I read in case you want more of the details.  The university officials say this is not a crisis – but it certainly sounds as if all is not peaches and cream in the athletic department.

Speaking of minor football endeavors, you may not have noticed that the Alliance of American Football (AAF) has scheduled its kick-off date for 9 February 2019.  That is correct, the AAF will play its first game(s) 6 days after the Super Bowl in Atlanta.  Do not be confused; this is not the same enterprise as Vince McMahon’s planned resurrection of the XFL; this is a totally separate venture and this one is populated and managed by people with long backgrounds in the NFL.  Bill Polian and Charlie Ebersol – son of former NBC sports maven Dick Ebersol – were heavily involved in getting things moving.  The AAF is not out to take on the NFL head on; its “vision” is that football fans suffer a let-down after the Super Bowl is over and they want to let those fans “extend their interest in football” beyond the first Sunday of February and into the Spring.

It is probably wrong to consider the AAF in the same way we think if minor league baseball leagues.  There is no plan for AAF teams to be aligned with NFL teams or to share players.  Maybe the better model to consider for the AAF is the NBA’s D-League.  Even that comparison has it flaws because many D-League teams are affiliated with specific NBA teams.  The idea behind the AAF is twofold:

  1. Provide fans with quality football – not necessarily NFL quality football – at a time of the year when there is no other football for fans to consume.
  2. Provide players who are not quite at the caliber of NFL players and give them a chance to develop their skills such that they may become competitive NFL-level players.

The NFL itself has tried to do something similar in the past but the World League of American Football and NFL Europe never made it.  It will be a challenge for the AAF; early on into their season, they will run into March Madness.

Here are the locations of the teams that will kick off the AAF:

  • Atlanta
  • Birmingham
  • Memphis
  • Orlando
  • Phoenix
  • Salt Lake City
  • San Antonio
  • San Diego

The AAF is going to try to “tailor” the personnel on the teams to local interest.  Bill Polian said that if Trent Richardson wants to play football again, he would hope to have him play for Birmingham in the AAF.  Steve Spurrier has already been lured out of retirement as the coach of the Orlando franchise.  Michael Vick in an offensive coordinator in the AAF; not surprisingly, he is with the Atlanta franchise.

There will be rules modifications in the AAF.  They will have a 30-second play clock (Chip Kelly would be happy with that.) and there will be no kickoffs or onside kicks.  The intent is to put a football game into a 2.5-hour time slot; if they can do that, the AAF will be attractive to TV execs.

Can the AAF make it?  Well, none of the previous “Spring Football” ideas survived for long – unless you count the USFL’s anti-trust win over the NFL in court as “survival”.  The difference here is that the AAF is not taking the NFL on as a competitor which most of the previous “Spring Football” entities sought to do.  Another difference is that the AAF is managed and populated with lots of NFL people which was not the case with many of the previous “Spring Football” enterprises.  The AAF is not a shoo-in to succeed, but it is worth following its ramp-up to kickoff next February.  The next set of “big events” for the AAF will come when the NFL cuts its camp rosters from 90 players down to 53 players; those cut downs could make 1184 football players who are at or close to “NFL-caliber” available to the AAF.  I expect a flurry of signings.

Finally, here is a question posed by Dwight Perry in the Seattle Times regarding one of the NFL Exhibition Games:

“Antonio Callaway turned a short pass into a 54-yard TD in the Browns’ exhibition opener, just days after the rookie receiver was pulled over and cited for marijuana possession.

“Just one question: If the cops can catch him, why can’t the New York Giants?”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

Faux Football…

As you know, I refuse to refer to NFL games in August as “Pre-Season Games” because I prefer to call them what they are.  They are Exhibition Games – or Faux Football if you prefer.  The fact that NFL teams would require me to buy two exhibition game tix as part of a season ticket package would demand that I find some other way to spend my entertainment dollars.  In this week’s Football Morning in America column at NBCSports.com, Peter King had this to say:

“How can people pay real money to see these games? I have covered this game for 34 years and said it 34 times. This game took 3 hours, 37 minutes to play, had 32 called penalties (26 accepted, for 265 yards), saw five turnovers, saw one pass from the two starting quarterbacks (Sam Bradford one, Philip Rivers zero), and showed a savior quarterback in Josh Rosen who’s got a lot of work to do. It generally bored us to tears.”

I am more than happy to associate myself with Peter King’s commentary here…

President Trump continues to weigh in on the NFL’s “Anthem Situation”.  Obviously, he can say whatever he believes about the situation, but I have to say that I wish his commentaries were more helpful than they have been.  So far, they have exacerbated the situation rather than moved it toward a resolution.  And don’t get me started on the list of things that the President ought to be focused on before worrying about if people stand or sit or kneel during the National Anthem.  Having said that, I must correct the President on one point:

  • At one point, President Trump said that the players make most of the money brought in by the NFL.
  • According to the extant CBA, the players get 48.5% of the national football revenue while the owners get 51%.  [I think I have read the CBA correctly on this issue but if I am off, it is not by more than one percent.]
  • There is no mathematical construct using real numbers whereby 48.5% of the national revenue amounts to “most of the money brought in”.  Player salaries are a large expense item for the teams but even in aggregate, those salaries do not amount to half – let alone most – of the money that rolls in.
  • #NotFakeMath…

The Pro Football Hall of Fame in Canton is considering an alteration of its rules for eligibility.  In addition to the current hurdles a player must cross to be elected and inducted, the HoF is not considering having the potential inductees sign a letter of intent to attend the induction ceremonies. In the pantheon of bad ideas, they should put this one in the “Petty & Feckless Wing”.

Quite obviously, this potential new hurdle to getting into the HoF is a reaction to Terrell Owens’ boycott of this year’s ceremony.  I hope no one associated with the HoF or any of its voting members tries to pretend that there is any other reason for this idea to see the light of day.  And it is a bad idea on a minimum of 2 levels:

  1. It will forever be known as the “T.O. Rule”.  And because it will have that name, it will focus attention in the future on the fact the T.O. stiffed the HoF and skipped the induction ceremony.  Is that what the folks who run the Hall of Fame really want to do?  Look, T.O. is an attention-slut.  The last thing any person or entity wants to do is to make T.O. the center of attention on a recurring basis.  It is like feeding donuts to Sally Struthers…
  2. Potentially worse is what will the HoF do if a player signs the Letter of Intent and shows up for all the ceremonial stuff for a couple of days before the big event and then he and his presenter decide to walk out just as it is their turn to fill the air with verbiage.  Since T.O. has claimed the “no-show” version of showing up the HoF, the next unclaimed symbolic insult would be the “walk-out”.  Does the HoF want to encourage that?

Here is what I would do regarding T.O. after his “counter-ceremony” in Chattanooga.

  • I would take the pedestal in the Hall on which his bust would sit and the plaque that would cite his accomplishments that got him elected to the Hall of Fame and leave them empty.  A small handwritten note might be taped to the vacancies saying that the player elected to be here in the Hall of Fame decided that he would prefer not to be part of the Hall of Fame.
  • Then I would melt down the bust and the plaque and move on …

Let me focus your attention on some MLB attendance issues.  As of today, the Miami Marlins have the worst average attendance in MLB at 9,677 fans per game.  Frankly, I am not all that surprised here; the Marlins traded away just about every good player they had (except for JT Realmuto) and they could find a way to lose 100 games this year.  Add to that toxic mix the straight-up fact that Miami is not a great sports town unless one of its teams is in championship winning mode.

Second worst attendance in MLB is Tampa Bay.  The Rays have annual problems drawing fans for a variety of reasons and this year is no exception.  The Rays average 14,683 fans per game.  Once again, there is no shock at seeing the Rays at or near the bottom of the attendance standings.

Here is the surprise.  The team third from the bottom in average attendance (18,409 per game) is the Oakland A’s.  The A’s have been very low on this kind of list for the last decade or so, but this year the A’s are contending for the division title and for a wild-card slot in the playoffs.  And they still only draw flies.  What makes this even worse is that the A’s are drawing almost 1000 fewer fans per game this year than they did last year.

Finally, Scott Ostler of the SF Chronicle had this to say about the Oakland Coliseum – – and it might explain in part the A’s attendance woes:

“There was a fire at the Coliseum, but a convenient sewage overflow put it out. “

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

Baseball Season With One Quarter Left To Go

We are approaching that time on the sports calendar when just about anything related to college or pro football dominates the newsfeed; and, to be sure, we have news in that quadrant of the sports cosmos today.  [I plan to spend plenty of time tomorrow on college football stuff.]  Nevertheless, this is still baseball season and we are getting to the point where the pennant races and playoff races are solidifying.  So, let’s take a look …

  1. The American League is not particularly exciting for the moment.  It would not be surprising to see 2 AL teams win 100 or more games this year and it would not be surprising to see 3 other AL teams lose 100 or more games this year.  The AL is widely dispersed when it comes to the “haves” and “have nots” this year.
  2. I am ready to call the Red Sox and the Indians as division champions.  With a tad less certainty, I will call the Astros the AL West champions.
  3. The Yankees may win 100 games this year and be a wild-card team; the only real mystery left in the AL is who will be the AL West champ and which team will be the runner-up there to meet the Yankees in a 1-game playoff.
  4. The National League is far more interesting.  No team is in a position where they are comfortably atop their division such that they can coast for a week or so.
  5. There are 8 teams within 5 games of one another in the three divisions.  It looks as if those races will go down to the final week – at least – and maybe the final day of the season.  If forced to pick now, I will take the Dodgers, Cubs and Braves to win their divisions with the D-Backs and Brewers as the wild-cards.

The 2018 Yankees suffer from being in the same division as the unbelievably successful Red Sox.  As of this weekend, the Yankees merely projected to win 99 games which in most seasons means a division crown.  Nonetheless, the Yankees find themselves almost 10 games out of the division race but comfortably in a wild-card seat.  The hope for a significant race in the AL East that might come down to the “final days” when the Yankees and Red Sox face each other in a 3-game series is this:

  • The Yankees have a pillow-soft schedule between now and the middle of September.  They could go on an epic tear…
  • The next 20 games for the Yankees are against teams with either a losing record for the season or a team that is 2 games over .500 for the season.  It is not unreasonable to expect the Yankees to go 14-6 against that competition.
  • Then the Yankees have 6 games against the Mariners and the A’s.  Those teams are solid and strong this year; let’s give the Yankees a split there.
  • After that 6-game competitive stretch, the Yankees then play 6 more “soft schedule games” before a 3-game set with the Red Sox.  Then it is 7 more games against the Orioles and Rays before the final 3-game set with the Red Sox.  For these 10 games, assign the Yankees 6 wins.
  •             By my calculation, the Yankees could enter that final series with the Red Sox with 97 wins (conservatively).  So, it is possible the Yankees might win 100 games in 2018 and finish “up the track” in their division.  That does not happen very often…

Jayson Werth is not down with what he calls the “super nerds” in baseball.  To say that he thinks “Advanced Analytics” have gone too far in the game would be a monumental understatement.  If you Google “Jayson Werth baseball nerds”, you will find dozens of links that will lay out his position on this subject – – and other links that will take exception with his position.

In the extreme, I think Werth is correct.  Obviously, some managers overuse and overthink the data that is available to them during a game.  More malignantly, some managers might ignore reality and just look at “numbers” in key situations.  If there is an at-bat with runners on and the game on the line, I don’t really care what the numbers say; if Derek Jeter is the guy scheduled to come to the plate, it does not matter what guy you have on the bench with a better WAR or with a better average against the pitcher on the mound.  In that circumstance, you let Jeter hit and go with the result.

Scott Ostler of the SF Chronicle seems to have the same respect for advanced analytics that I have.  I think they have value for a manager, but I do not think they should be taken as gospel truths.  Here are some comments from Scott Ostler on that subject:

“Here’s a serious idea for a cool new baseball stat, because Lord knows we need more:  The size of the miss.  When a batter swings and misses, by how many inches did he miss?”

And …

“Also, why can’t we get a stat on which umpires are the most/least accurate at calling balls and strikes?  So fans can boo intelligently.”

Hey, I grew up going to baseball games in Philly (both the Phillies and the A’s) and the concept of “boo intelligently” is not something that immediately resonates with the core fans there.  But now that I am an educated and rational adult, I can get my arms around Professor Ostler’s concept.

Finally, here is another baseball commentary from Scott Ostler in the SF Chronicle on a totally different aspect of the game:

“The A’s are selling beer for $4.  So a family of five Oakland fans can drink for what one person pays at the Giants’ ballpark.  Caveat: the Giants’ $19.25 brewski is “craft” beer.  Meaning it was not brewed in the training-room whirlpool bath.

“Four bucks for a beer?  I’ll go even on days when there’s no game.”

Me too…

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

All Around The Mulberry Bush Today …

In a column last week in the Hampton Roads Virginian-Pilot, Bob Molinaro offered up some career advice for enterprising young techies who want to get their foot in the door in the sports world”

“Sign of the times: In the wake of three big-leaguers expressing regrets for homophobic and racists tweets written as teenagers, it’s past time pro franchises – and perhaps colleges – hired somebody to do nothing but comb through every player’s social media and delete old, embarrassing messages. Wait and see: Tweet hunters will be the newest sports growth industry.”

I think Professor Molinaro is on to something here.  There are two trends in the US these days that contribute to the potential growth in this field:

  1. Gotcha America:  In this milieu, one searches for and gets credit for finding a previously unseen flaw in a public figure and springing it on him/her in a very public setting
  2. Aggrieved America:  In this milieu, everyone reserves for himself/herself a God-given right to be offended by anything even marginally untoward done by a public figure in his/her past or present. Moreover, inhabitants of Aggrieved America also declare their right to let everyone else know how mightily offended they are.

When someone finds an “offensive” Tweet or Facebook posting from long ago for a public figure, that becomes the confluence of Gotcha America and Aggrieved America and that leads to a maelstrom of misery for the offender.  It matters not how long ago the transgression was or if the transgression has been repeated as a continuing pattern.  In the maelstrom of misery, the only thing that is certain is that the offender must be vilified and shamed in the current moment for happenings in the past.  Sadly, this makes me believe that Molinaro’s idea for a new career field has legs.

Switching gears …  The NBA announced its Christmas Day games this week.  There will be 5 of them.  Anyone who has ever thought about the NBA for more than a millisecond knew what one of the games would be; so, the announcement of the 5-game menu had only 4 games that might have surprised anyone.

  1. The Warriors versus the LeBrons – errr the Lakers:  Everyone saw that one coming.  By the way, given the rest of the Lakers’ roster for 2018/19, calling them the LA LeBrons makes plenty of sense.  It is about the only reason to pay attention to the team.
  2. The Knicks versus the Bucks:  The NBA puts the Knicks on every year on Christmas Day.  I guess it is about getting fans in the NY market interested in tuning in because the Knicks are absolutely irrelevant.  Kristaps Porzingas will not be ready to play in December so who outside of NYC cares to see the rest of that roster?  OK, Giannis Antetokounmpo is always fun to watch – – but there could be opponents a lot more interesting.
  3. The Jazz versus the Blazers:  This should be an interesting game; both teams made the playoffs last year and the Jazz made it to the second round.  Like Antetokounmpo, Donovan Mitchell is always fun to watch.
  4. The Thunder versus the Rockets:  This game should be interesting and important; these are two of the best teams in the Western Conference.  Sadly, I think the storyline here will be Melo versus his old thunder teammates.  If you tune in, just ignore that meaningless storyline.  Melo was a non-entity in OKC last year and is not going to be a pivotal player in Houston this year; he has reached his sell-by date.
  5. The Sixers versus the Celtics:  This should be a good game and an important game.  This year, these two teams can re-kindle an NBA rivalry from “way back when”.  It just might be that these are the two teams playing for the Eastern Conference championship next June now that LeBron has taken his talents to the Western Conference.

Data are in for the second month of legal sports wagering in Delaware.  Here is the bottom line:

  • From 25 June through 29 July, wagers totaled approximately $8.2M and bettors collected $7.7M.
  • Net profit for the sportsbooks and the State of Delaware was $461,226.
  • Profit is split 50/50 between the State and the casinos.

The Arizona Cardinals seem to be taking their lead from baseball teams this year.  Often, I chronicle here some of the culinary catastrophes offered up at ballyards; this year the Cardinals have one for their football patrons.  Before revealing the “recipe” for this bad boy, the overview goes like this.  It is a hamburger-based dish that has 11 ingredients, weighs 7 pounds and costs $75.  Put on a bib and grab the Rolaids; here are the makings for The Gridiron Burger:

  • 5 hamburger patties each weighing 1/3 of a pound
  • 5 beef hotdogs – pay no attention to what parts of the cow are in there
  • 5 brats – sausages not children
  • 20 slices of American cheese – don’t want none of that foreign stuff
  • 8 slices of bacon – seems light on the bacon, no?
  • 8 chicken tenders – why not?
  • 12 oz fries – just to be sure we have enough fat and carbs here
  • Lettuce, tomatoes, pickles – – and – –
  • “Tank Sauce” – whatever that might or might not be
  • All of this is stacked in the middle of a 10-inch hamburger bun

This baby probably has the caloric content ingested by a family in Darfur in a week. But the Cardinals think the Gridiron Burger should present a challenge to their fans.  Anyone who can eat this entire thing in 60 minutes – by himself or herself – will get a free Arizona Cardinals jersey and will get his/her picture displayed on the stadium big screen.  Joey Chestnut,

  • Come on down …!

Finally, since I started this rant with a comment by Bob Molinaro, let me close with another of his observations:

“Up North: Sure, Johnny Manziel threw four interceptions in his debut with the Montreal Alouettes, but that did give him an opportunity to make two tackles.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………