I am not going to pretend to know with any degree of certainty greater than homeopathic concentration levels about the future successes/failures of QBs taken in the 2018 NFL Draft. Nonetheless:
- How do you think Tyrod Taylor feels today having signed a free agent deal with the Browns only to see the Browns spend the overall #1 pick on Baker Mayfield?
- Similarly, how do you think Sam Bradford feels today having signed a free agent deal with the Cards only to see the Cards trade up to acquire Josh Rosen?
Notwithstanding any and all of the stress and agita that might arouse from such draft circumstances, there may indeed be more pressure on the incumbent QB in Baltimore than there is elsewhere among established starting QBs. Joe Flacco is the starter for the Ravens; that is a fact and that is not going to change over the next several months so long as Flacco is not involved in a traffic incident that leaves him as a multiple amputee. Ravens’ fans can take opposing positions on the “question” posed above; but I think that question is settled and unworthy of appeal. Here is what the Ravens and Joe Flacco have to look forward to in training camp the year:
- Recall that the Ravens signed RG3 to an incentive laden contract merely 2 weeks ago. RG3 can run; no one can dispute that statement.
- In the first round of the draft, the Ravens traded up to take Lamar Jackson. That means they have two “running QBs” on the team behind Joe Flacco who is more mobile than an elm tree – – but not much more.
Forget any “training cam controversies”. The Ravens are set up to create shouting matches among their own fanbase after every loss and maybe after some of their wins too. It should be “fun and games” in Crabtown…
With the Draft in the rearview mirror, the oddsmakers in Las Vegas have posted the futures bets for the 2018 season. According to them, 19 of the 32 NFL teams will win 8 or more games this year. That can happen of course, but it requires a few teams to win a lot less than 8 games and the oddsmakers do not have any teams lower than 5 wins for the season.
Fear not; the oddsmakers have not lost their minds. Remember, they are not posting numbers that necessarily reflect reality; they are posting odds that – hopefully from their point of view – will balance their books. Fans of teams tend to be overly optimistic at this point of the season; and so, the sportsbooks taking futures bets want the win totals for 2018 to reflect that optimism.
The person who I refer to as the “Chief Logistics Officer” for our annual Las Vegas sojourn thinks it might be a winning strategy to bet all 32 teams UNDER their posted win totals at this point of the year. Here is the link to those totals. I will check this out and report back in December.
Switching to baseball, I realize that the season is only one month old. Nevertheless, the Miami Marlins do not have the worst record in MLB at this point of the season despite their team-gutting activities over the winter. In fact, at the start of May, there are 5 teams that would fall below the Marlins if MLB had a single ranking of teams.
- Marlins 10-18 Win percentage = .357
- Padres 10-20 Win percentage = .333
- White Sox 8-18 Win percentage = .308
- Orioles 8-20 Win percentage = .286
- Royals 7-21 Win percentage = .250
- Reds 7-22 Win percentage = .241
Is this the start of a “grand race to the bottom”? Or, are there really 6 teams in MLB that are fielding the moral equivalent of a AAA team for the year in hopes of getting the first pick in the MLB Draft next year?
The Marlins project today to win 58 games; that means they will lose more than 100 games. By projection, 6 teams in MLB will lose more than 100 games this year; even worse, the Reds project to win only 39 games for the season meaning they would lose 123 games – – clearly a modern record for failure.
Finally, here is a comment from syndicated columnist, Norman Chad, describing a truly frightening scenario:
“I woke up in a dead sweat the other night from a dream in which I was the sideline reporter at a pantomime competition.”
But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………
um, Curm – the Browns traded for Taylor – he wasn’t a free agent. And I think everyone knew the Browns were drafting a QB, if not #1 overall the #4 overall
Ed:
You are correct; the Browns traded for Taylor; mea culpa. Nevertheless, his position on the team has to be a bit less comfy today than it was 24 hours before the Browns took a QB with the overall #1 pick.
A Joe Flacco controversy? Does that mean we have ten more weeks of fantasy-football 13 – 3 team predictions?
Tenacious P:
No Joe Flacco controversy this season – – but if the Ravens do not make the playoffs this year, it could mean the end of the John Harbaugh Era in Baltimore and the new coach is not likely to be someone who has any long-term connections to Joe Flacco going forward…