Category: Daily Rants

There is a story in the NY Post today about the sentencing of a man in NY who plead guilty to a count of trying to fix a college basketball game between St. Johns and Wagner in 2018.  The story in the paper goes into the details of his planning and into how the plot came unglued; that is not the takeaway for me.

The man in question is 25 years old.  He intended to bet $50K on the game he thought he had fixed; he did not make the bet nor did the game turn out the way the “fix” was supposed to have it turn out.  Trust me, the path from beginning to end in this story is a tortuous one indeed.  Here is the thing that is important to me:

• The perpetrator here will likely spend six months in jail per his plea agreement in the case – – assuming the judge goes along with that agreement.
• The maximum penalty the perpetrator could face in the matter is 5 years in jail.

Assume for a moment that this guy had been doubly successful here and had fixed the game properly and won a series of bets worth $50K without being caught.  Basically, what I am asking you to imagine are the actions of someone with the access, the money and the conniving nature to make such a scheme work.  It has happened before; it could happen again; all I want you to do for a moment is to think about the outcome if this plot had been successful.  Now ask yourself this question:

• Is a six-month jail sentence any sort of deterrent here?

Remember, none of this “fixing” actually happened; the plot did not materialize.  But, if it had succeeded, would the threat of a 6-month jail sentence be sufficient to convince the guy who just made a quick $50K that he should not try to do this again?  Five years “up the river” so to speak might make someone think twice; but six months?

About 30 years ago, Congress passed PASPA – the Pro and Amateur Sports Protection Act – which was subsequently declared unconstitutional.  It sought to eliminate sports gambling because it was a threat to the integrity of the sports.  In the ruling by the US Supreme Court that declared PASPA unconstitutional, the Court left open the possibility of the Congress legislating something else in that area that might meet Constitutional standards.  Here is a thought for the 535 Congressthings who cannot seem to be able to find their way out of a toilet stall without a map:

• Maybe a mandatory minimum sentence – no plea agreements below the minimum allowed – where the duration is at least 5 years long would be a way to put a caution sign in the mind of a future ne’er-do-well plotting to fix a basketball or football game.

I was already primed to take the “sports betting avenue” as one of the items for today’s rant before coming across the NY Post story this morning.  The false positive – and/or inconclusive/ambiguous –  COVID-19 test results for Matthew Stafford in the NFL and for Juan Soto in MLB made me think that the current environment for sports in the US has opened up another vulnerability for a betting coup.

There have always been – and will always continue to be – vulnerabilities for athletes and officials and coaches/managers to take a bribe to pre-determine the outcome of a game for a gambler.  In 2020, you can add to that list someone like “the guy who does the COVID-19 tests for star players the day before a game but several days after the insiders have gotten down on the game”.

Take the two player examples I mentioned above:

• The Washington Nationals can win games without Juan Soto, but they are more likely to win with him in the lineup than back in the team hotel “in quarantine”.
• If the Detroit Lions are playing the Chicago Bears on Sunday and the line has been Bears – 2.5 all week long, any bettors who took the Bears at that price would have a leg up on any of the bettors who wanted to back the Bears after the news of a positive test for Matthew Stafford’s positive test and subsequent inability to play in the game.  Now if that “Matthew Stafford positive result” did not break until late on Saturday evening, bettors with “the inside story” would have had plenty of time to get down lots of small to medium sized bets at lots of sportsbooks in order to raise only minimal suspicion.

Please note: I am not saying this is going to happen.  I am merely pointing out that the coronavirus has introduced a new vulnerability with regard to the “wagering integrity” of games in 2020.  Football and basketball would seem to be more susceptible to these kinds of shenanigans than baseball, so I wonder how the “guardians of integrity” in those areas have prepared themselves to protect that link in the “chain of integrity”.  For the record:

• I would be surprised if anyone in the NCAA football or basketball world has even considered this yet.  The “integrity cops” for collegiate sports are always like the aggrieved husband whose wife is out having affairs all over town; like him, the NCAA “integrity cops” are always the last to know.
• The NBA has had its awareness jolted by the Tim Donaghy Saga.  Presumably, they have monitoring methodologies to make a repeat of that nonsense “less than likely”.  The NBA is protected by the magnitude of the salaries earned by its players.  To “buy off” a couple of NBA starters to adjust a game score to a spread value would make the up-front costs very unlikely.  So, what about the testing personnel …?
• The NFL has not had a long history of players caught throwing games.  Perhaps that is because – like baseball – more than a couple of players would need to take part in the plot.  However, the NFL has not covered itself in glory when it comes to “investigative matters”.  They did not get the “Ray Rice tape” for example.  So, have they an “integrity measure” in place for the COVID-19 testers?   I will bet that they would say they do if asked in a public forum…

Finally, Dwight Perry posed an interesting question regarding a possible aftermath of the World Series in this year of COVID-19:

“If the Blue Jays win the World Series, will they be treated to a championship parade through the vacated streets of Buffalo?”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

Yesterday, I spent some tine talking about MLB and its less-than-fully-successful health and safety protocol.  Down in the minor leagues, there is no such thing as a baseball season; minor league teams are shut down and are hoping to find ways to survive until a “normal” baseball season returns in 2021.  I was reminded of that “survival effort” recently when I received an email from the Pawtucket Red Sox offering me the opportunity to purchase $50 or more of PawSox apparel or novelties with the enticement that orders of $50 or more would get me a free replica of McCoy Stadium – the Paw Sox home field.  I chose not to place an order.

That offer reminded me that I have received several emails from the Altoona Curve this season telling me about events they are holding online and socially-distanced at their park such as Trivia Night and a regularly scheduled local farmers’ market.  In addition, the Curve has a sponsorship with a local business to recognize health workers in the area for their efforts in dealing with COVID-19.

Another email from the Richmond Flying Squirrels informed me that I can go to the stadium for a movie night.  The team has transformed its field, The Diamond, to an outdoor movie theater

I have read reports that other minor league teams took the opportunity to covert their fields into 9-hole golf courses once they knew that this season was kaput.  The Portland Sea Dogs were one of those teams and you can now play a round in their stadium for $30.  The Pensacola Blue Wahoos have listed their park as an “Airbnb” for an overnight stay and use of the field and the batting cages.  Evidently, that has generated some interest such that the Blue Wahoos have now added a disc-golf course to that field for its guests.  The Columbia Fireflies have fashioned an outdoor restaurant in their park that allows for socially-distanced dining.

I mention these examples to demonstrate that minor league teams are dealing with a scenario that is more desperate than MLB teams.  MLB teams still bring in some not-so-insignificant revenues from sponsorships and media rights; minor league teams do not have those revenues to start with; minor league teams survive with a few meager local sponsorships and with revenue from the live gate and concessions.  For that reason, minor league teams have always been highly creative with their promotions and many of those teams are putting that creativity to work in 2020 hoping to make it through to 2021.

The first time I attended a minor league baseball game was in the early 1970s; I was on a business trip to Appleton, WI for several days and read in the local paper about a game one night for the Appleton Foxes.  With nothing better to do, I went to the game and had a great time for about $10.  I was hooked – – and went back the next night to see another game.  The early part of my career took me to a lot of “micropolitan areas” in the US where minor league baseball was a fundamental part of the community and I partook of many games around the country in those times.  Even now in a normal season, I try to see several minor league games because I find the fan experience there to be more enjoyable than the fan  experience at an MLB game.  [Note:  I did NOT say the games are better; there is a clear and obvious diminution of talent on display in a minor league game.]

Just in case I have not been sufficiently clear, I am rooting for minor league baseball to survive this financial drought and make it back vigorously in 2021…

Turning attention now to “minor league football”, the XFL was sold earlier this week to a consortium featuring The Rock.  Interestingly, The Rock began his journey to celebrity status as a pro ‘rassler in WWE; he purchased the XFL from Vince McMahon who is the major domo of WWE.  The sale price for the league was reported to be $15M.  The XFL returned to the field in February of 2020 and ceased on-field operations soon after that.  The league filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy action with the intention of reorganizing its finances and trying a return to the field in 2021 or maybe even 2022.  Any public statements proffered at the time of such events need to be taken with a gain of salt but there was one part of The Rock’s statement that caught my eye:

“With pride and gratitude for all that I’ve built with my own two hands, I plan to apply these callouses to the XFL, and look forward to creating something special for the players, fans, and everyone involved for the love of football.”

Might it be that The Rock will be part of the presentation of the games themselves?  Pro ‘rasslers are comfortable behind a microphone in attempts to generate interest in their spectacles; movie actors are comfortable in front of audiences.  The Rock has more than a little bit of “star-power” and that might be a valuable intangible asset for what will have to be known as XFL 3.0.

This transaction requires the approval/assent of the bankruptcy court overseeing the restructuring of the XFL as an entity.  In the original filing the league said it had assets worth about $10M and liabilities of about $50M.  Those “unsecured creditors” who make up much of that $50M liability for the league protest that the price here is well below “market value” and have objected to its approval.  I know nothing about bankruptcy proceedings, but it seems to me that if something is openly put up for sale and the highest bidder for it is $15M, that sets the “market value”.  But what do I know…?

There is a story out there regarding the football team and the athletic department at Colorado State that has the potential to be more than important.  According to the Washington Post the university president has promised an investigation into allegations that football players were “discouraged” from being tested for COVID-19 and that the team was purposely violating the NCAA COVID-19 procedures and quarantines.  I must point out right here that there has been pushback to these allegations from other football players.  This is a fluid situation; I am not comfortable that we have nearly all the facts in hand today.

Notwithstanding the lack of certainty as to what has happened and is happening at Colorado State, let me list here the prominent allegations:

1. Players were told not to report symptoms that might be associated with COVID-19.
2. Players were threatened with reduced playing time if they went into quarantine.
3. Unnamed individuals at Colorado State were altering the contact tracing reports to minimize possible exposures to the team.

This bears repeating; I have no idea whatsoever if any or all of those allegations have any basis in reality.  However, if they are true, then an awful lot of people need to lose their jobs and every one of them needs to get one of those NCAA show cause orders to make them difficult to hire in the collegiate sports business area for the next decade or so.  These allegations are not at the same level of wickedness as slipping a few thousand dollars to an athlete’s family under the table.  This action potentially jeopardizes the short-term and the long-term health of the players and the people who come in contact with players.  Hiding symptoms and falsifying tracing reports would not be “accidental” nor would they be “harmless”.

Pay attention to the upcoming chapters in this story; it just might be a blockbuster – – or a gigantic fizzle.

Finally, here is a positive observation about the sporting world today from Bob Molinaro in the Hampton Roads Virginian-Pilot:

“Up front: It’s unclear what other NFL teams have decided, or whether a league-wide mandate is forthcoming, but the Steelers just announced that for games played at Heinz Field even under reduced capacity rules and with social distancing, patrons will be required to wear masks. A high-five to the Steelers for not masking their intentions.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

One year from now – theoretically – the Tokyo Summer Olympics will be coming to an end.  I say theoretically because there is precious little time to achieve a measure of control over COVID-19 such that an assemblage of athletes and spectators from around the world would make even a shred of sense at that time.  I mention this today because I read something recently saying that the postponement of the 2020 Games – which would be ongoing now – for one year has cost the Japanese sponsors approximately $6B.  Obviously, I have not audited the numbers here, but let me assume it is about right.

Hosting the Olympics is a financial disaster for cities/countries whose economies are not on the top rung of the world’s economic ladder.  China’s economy continues to roll on notwithstanding the unused Olympic Village it built and the under-utilization of the “Bird’s Nest Stadium”; London used the Olympics there as a way to gentrify a portion of the city and that has worked; Los Angeles actually posted a net profit for the hosting of the Games themselves in 1984.  However, that is not the story for cities and countries lower on the economic ladder or ones that over-spent prudent limits that were in good economic situations.  Financial “problems” have befallen these Olympic venues:

• Montreal 1976:  The city funded the Olympic Games there by floating bonds and it took them 30 years to pay off that debt.  The Games themselves did not provide nearly the requisite cash flow to do so nor did the “persistent economic growth” materialize from the “investments” made to host the Games.
• Barcelona 1992:  The story here mirrors Montreal’s story.  The incurred debt to prepare for the Games required debt service that was not nearly covered by any “economic boom” from the Games and taxes had to be raised significantly for the city to remain solvent.
• Sydney 2000:  The legacy for the city is abandoned facilities/under-used facilities and debt.
• Greece 2004:  The massive economic loss here contributed significantly to the near collapse of the entire Greek economy about 3 years after the Games.
• Rio de Janeiro 2016:  One of the massive soccer stadiums built in the hinterlands for these Games is now used as a parking lot for busses.  ‘Nuff said?

Tokyo – and Japan in the larger sense – is a large and stable economy.  Even with the global disruptions caused by COVID-19, Japan is not teetering on insolvency in 2020 the way Greece was in 2004 or Rio in 2016.  Nevertheless, maybe it would be worth a moment to look at the up-front investment estimates that have gone into the now postponed 2021 Games.  According to various reports:

• 7 Billion Dollars:  That was the original commitment made to the IOC when Tokyo won the right to stage the Games.  That was the “investment” that was represented to the good folks in Tokyo for the privilege of being the host city.
• 18 Billion Dollars:  This is the mid-range of reported over-runs incurred in the process of preparing for the games to have begun in July 2020.  I have seen some reports saying the over-runs are only $16B and others that say it is just north of $20B
• 6 Billion Dollars:  This represents the cost of postponing the Games for a year.  Please do not ask me to enumerate how a delay can cost that much; I leave that to the economists and the accountants.

If these numbers are even close to correct, Tokyo now has $31B invested in the 2021 Summer Games – and they may not happen at all.  [Aside:  I am sure that velodrome they built to host the cycling events will find a good and profitable use as something else.]  However, even if the Games do take place, it is difficult to see how those Games will bring anything close to $31B to the city in a little over two weeks – – and that assumes that those Games would be “normal Games” with fans in attendance.  Holding the Games with limited or no fans in the venues might be financially worse than no Games at all.

Switching from the Olympics to college football, the Power 5 football conferences are coming up with schedules for 2020 that limit teams to conference games.  That means no games between Powerhouse U and a Division 1-AA team where the spread is set around 59 points.  I like that.  It also means that Power 5 teams will not be playing some of the straphangers in Division 1-A where the spread is set merely at 47 points.  I like that too.  However, there is fallout from those consequences of “only conference games” for Power 5 teams.

• Economic Fallout:  Those Division 1-AA schools and the Division 1-A straphangers get paid to take their shellackings – sometimes more than a million dollars.  And that payment is a significant part of the athletic department revenue for the season.  The effect goes beyond football because football is a revenue producing sport and it contributes to the support of the non-revenue producing sports at the schools.
• Athletic Fallout:  UConn became the first Division 1-A school to cancel its football season for 2020.  UConn is an independent and faced cancellation of several games because they would have been a “non-conference foe”.  The school prefers to call the “risks provided by COVID-19” as the cause for canceling the season, but the fact is that UConn only had 9 games on its schedule to begin with and at least three of those games were not going to happen.

Finally, here is a quotation I have had on my clipboard for an awfully long time.  It is not mine, but I do not have a notation to whom it belongs.  It deals with one of the unusual Olympic sports:

“Why is luge a sport?  You dress up like a giant sperm and go sledding really fast.  That’s hardly athletic.  Phallic and sexy, yes.  But hardly athletic.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

One can apply lots of adjectives to the 2020 MLB season to date; none of those adjectives are complimentary.  From the time in March when MLB shut down Spring Training through today, the folks in charge have stumbled in random directions arriving where they are today which is in the vicinity of Bizarro World.

MLB – and the MLBPA because the union is equally culpable here – had 4 months to become as knowledgeable as possible about COVID-19 so that they could come up with an efficient, effective and manageable plan for the conduct of a truncated 2020 season.  Instead, they got into a 4-month spitting contest over money and relegated the logistics of the season to “Priority Seven”.  The health and safety protocol is more than 100 pages long; it was effective for 4 days at the most.

Let us look at one key point in that protocol:

“In order for a 2020 season to be conducted safely, Covered Individuals must exercise care while away from Club facilities to avoid situations in which the risk of contracting the virus is elevated, such as participating in activities involving large groups or indoor activities in which people are in close proximity to one another (e.g., crowded restaurants, bars, clubs). MLB will not formally restrict the activities of Covered Individuals when they are away from Club facilities, but will expect the Covered Individuals on each Club to ensure that they all act responsibly.”  [“Covered Individuals” are players, coaches, managers, team officials and etc.]

Ladies and gentlemen, that is the firewall between the coronavirus and Major League Baseball.  That is what 4 months of thoughtful planning and consultation with experts came up with to keep MLB players away from COVID-19 and healthy enough to play the games without the teams themselves becoming super spreaders in society.  If any of these jamokes were compensated on a “pay for performance” basis, they would fall below the poverty line for 2020.

On the fourth day of the season, the Marlins knew they had some players in the clubhouse who had tested positive.  The team voted to play their scheduled game that day and it was not until after the fact that it was known that almost half of the Marlins’ team was carrying the virus.  So much for “testing and tracing” because none of that matters even a little bit if teams can decide on their own to put known carriers out there on the field for a game.

MLB has taken about a week to “conduct an investigation” into how those Marlins’ players contracted the virus and spread it within the clubhouse.  Guess what that investigation determined:

• The “Covered Individuals” who got infected did not obey the strictures of the health and safety protocols.
• The “Covered Individuals” were congregating in the hotel bar and going out for other social activities.
• It was the “poor decisions” made by the ‘Covered individuals” that caused the problems.

Excuse me, but that conclusion was a foregone conclusion before the investigation began – and by the way it was probably conducted by Inspector Clouseau.  Were the findings otherwise , the value and the efficacy of the 100-plus pages of prose that make up the health and safety protocol would be exposed as worthless.  It seems to be that the Mensa Members who created that document neglected to put any enforcement mechanisms in there.  [Aside:  That omission lands equally in the laps of MLB and the MLBPA!]  There are probably 1500 “Covered Individuals” spoken to by the protocol and the best that the mavens can come up with is that they will all “exercise care” and “act responsibly”.

Now, ask yourselves what sort of remedy/change of procedures MLB and the MLBPA might have come up with as a result of that “investigation”.  Here it is:

• Teams need to have a designated “compliance officer” who travels with the team to make sure that the “Covered Individuals” begin to exercise care and act responsibly.

There is a perfectly good word for “compliance officer” that every high school kid knows.  That word is “chaperone” – – and the compliance officers in MLB are not likely to be significantly more effective than the chaperones at your run-of-the-mill high school junior proms.

There are baseball rules and there are health and safety protocol rules and those rules are of no value if there is no enforcement mechanism.  Take the umpires off the field and let the players decide who is safe and who is out on close plays at the bases.  It will not work.  The same is true here; there are protocol rules that were awfully loose and had zero enforcement mechanism attached; players flouted those protocol rules and got sick and then got others sick.  Everyone is to blame here; no one comes out looking like anything but an [rhymes with “glass bowl”].

Want another example of a protocol rule that makes sense but is being ignored with no consequences?  According to the protocol, players are not supposed to spit.  Have you watched any of the games on TV?  What are the consequences for players – or umpires – who spit during the games?  There exists “indisputable video evidence” – to borrow a phrase from the NFL rule book – that the spitting rule is not being followed and there have not been any punishments handed out.  The lack of enforcement there points up a double problem:

1. Spitting is an act that assists the spread of the coronavirus.  More spitting means an increased probability that an infected “Covered Individual” can infect another as yet uninfected “Covered Individual”.  For the record, that is the antithesis of the purpose of the health and safety protocol.
2. When a rule exists and it is so obviously violated without any punishment or sanction at all, that creates an environment of contempt for other rules in the protocol.  If the situation calls for nominal adults to require a chaperone, the last thing you need is for those nominal adults to view the body of rules with contempt.

The MLB 2020 season is a mess.  There may be ways for the leagues to get out of the mess and proceed with the season without embarrassing themselves daily – – but it will not be easy.  The fact is that the coronavirus is still widespread in the US and these “Covered individuals” are going to have to travel over under around and through places where people who have nothing to do with MLB may have left viral traces lying around.  Look, the Marlins brought more virus loading to the Philadelphia area as a visiting team; the Cardinals did the same thing to Milwaukee; teams on road trips are potential virus spreaders.  MLB cannot evade that reality.

Baseball in 2020 reminds me of a guy at a poker table who is losing his shirt but keeps dipping into his bank account for another stake because he is “due for some good cards”.  It seems to me that MLB thinks its due for some good news and just keeps on keeping on…  Albert Einstein reminded us that insanity is doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting different outcomes.

Finally, let me close today with a cogent baseball observation from Bob Molinaro in the Hampton Roads Virginian-Pilot:

“Sarcasm ahead: I don’t know how baseball people were able to judge the greatness of Babe Ruth, Hank Aaron, Mickey Mantle and Willie Mays without knowing the launch angle and exit velocity of their home runs.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

It has been a while since I had the chance to comment on NFL matters that have on-field implications beyond what people are going to call the Washington franchise this year.  So, let me do a little catching up with a comment on the Jets trading away safety, Jamal Adams.  They sort of had to make a deal sometime because Adams was clearly disgruntled over the lack of contract extension talks.  They got a deal from the Seahawks that gave the Jets two first round picks, a third-round pick and a replacement at the safety position.

Most of the folks who have analyzed this trade – or assigned grades to both teams for making the deal – focused on the Jets getting 2 first round picks as the major assets in return for Adams.  In most cases I would agree with that but my sense was that the Jets just do not draft well and so I wondered if those two first-rounders were as valuable as they seemed.

I went to Google and found a history of NY Jets draft picks leading to this summary:

• Quinnen Williams (DT) – first round pick in 2019 – played in 13 games last year starting 9 of them – recorded 2.5 sacks and 15 solo tackles.  Ho-hum!
• Sam Darnold (QB) – first round pick in 2018 – first two seasons have been OK but nothing more than that – a work-in-progress?
• Jamal Adams (S) – first round pick in 2017 – excellent players now traded away
• Darron Lee (LB) – first round pick in 2016 – now with the Chiefs
• Leonard Williams (DT) – first round pick in 2015 – now with the Giants
• Calvin Pryor (DB) – first round pick in 2014 – played for the Jags in 2017 and has been out of the league in 2018 and 2019.
• Dee Milliner (DB) – first round pick in 2013 – played well in rookie year and then was out of the league after his third season.
• Sheldon Richardson (DT) – another first round pick in 2013 – played 4 seasons with the Jets and is now with the Browns.
• Quinton Coples (DE) – first round pick in 2012 – last played in the NFL in 2015.

That list tells me two things:

1. Other than Jamal Adams who was just traded away, the Jets have not taken any star players with their first-round picks since 2012.  [In fact, the last bona-fide star drafted in the first round by the Jets was Darrelle Revis in 2007.]
2. The Jets do not tend to keep their first-round picks on the team as foundation pieces for very long.

As I was reading about NFL players opting out for the 2020 season over the weekend, I ran across a listing around noon on Saturday.  At that point, 34 players had opted-out and 19 of them were either offensive linemen, defensive linemen or linebackers.  Keith Jackson used to refer to those units as the “Big Uglies”; however, don’t call them the “Big Dummies”.  Those are players who are going to be violating social distancing guidelines on every snap of the ball AND those are players who carry with them one of the “underlying conditions” for COVID-19 severity – namely high body mass index.

Over the weekend, ESPN revealed the new announcing team for Monday Night Football in 2020.  It will be a 3-man booth:

• Steve Levy will do play by play.  He is solid in that role; he will not drown out the game with vocal histrionics.
• Brian Griese will be an analyst.  He and Levy have worked together before and done a good job on the mic.
• Louis Riddick will be an analyst.  I really like Riddick on the studio programming on ESPN.  If he carries over that level of performance to MNF, he will be a star.

I have to believe that the suits at ESPN want this team to be stable for a few years because the recent history of the MNF announcing crew has been an embarrassment for the self-proclaimed “World-wide Leader in Sports”.  Here is what has been on the air since Mike Tirico left ESPN to go to NBC after the 2015 season:

• 2016-2017:  Sean McDonough and Jon Gruden called MNF.  By that point in his career, Gruden had become repetitive and annoying; McDonough could not cover that up.
• 2018:  Joe Tessitore, Jason Witten and “The Booger Mobile”:  Witten was awful; the “Booger Mobile” was transcendentally stupid; Tessitore would go into a paroxysm over a 7-yard gain.  It was a painful year.
• 2019:  Joe Tessitore and Booger McFarland in the booth.  Witten’s return to the field was an announcing “addition by subtraction”; I thought McFarland was fine and Tessitore was still hyperventilating over first downs.  ESPN decided to “go in a different direction”…

I am a little surprised that ESPN did not find a way to pry Ian Eagle loose from CBS.  He and Dan Fouts were the CBS #2 announcing team for NFL football last year.  Fouts’ contract expired after last season do Eagle will pair with Charles Davis as the #2 team at CBS this year.  The thing here is that Eagle is blocked at CBS because the #1 team there is Jim Nantz and Tony Romo.  Nantz is only 61 years old and CBS is not likely to jettison him any time soon; room just signed a 10-year contract with CBS, so he is not going anywhere either.  With that dynamic in place, I thought ESPN might have been able to do some business with Ian Eagle.  Oh well…

Finally, now that we have a short respite from hearing about contract negotiations between the Cowboys and Dak Prescott, consider this observation from Bob Molinaro in the Hampton Roads Virginian-Pilot:

“Franchised: During Dak Prescott’s contract saga, would it have been impolite to point out that the Cowboys behind Prescott were 8-8 last season?”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

The last time the Phillies and the Marlins took the field in an MLB game was last Sunday.  The Marlins did so with 4 known COVID-19 cases on the team and subsequent testing has shown that almost 20 players, coaches and staff personnel have contracted the virus.  Meanwhile, the Phillies have not reported any positive tests for players but in the middle of the week the club revealed that a coach and a team staff member did test positive.  Last night the Phillies made these announcements:

• The team has discontinued all baseball operations until further notice.
• The weekend series between the Phillies and the Blue Jays will not happen.

There needs to be some perspective here.  The Phillies have already postponed a series with the Yankees; combined with this series, the Phillies will have postponed 6 games; in the truncated 2020 season, that represents 10% of the entire season.  For comparison purposes, imagine a situation where a team had 16 rainouts on the books sometime in late April of a normal season; the scheduling gymnastics to pull together a full season would be daunting.

MLB has reacted to this situation with what appears to be a band-aid.  From here forward, each team must take a “coronavirus compliance officer” with them on road trips.  The duties for this haute fonctionnaire is to assure that the rules laid out in the MLB COVID-19 protocol are followed notwithstanding a few elephants that are still in the room:

• Elephant #1:  The tracing for the source of the Marlins’ outbreak is either not yet done or is inconclusive on THE most important question here – – how did the virus get in the clubhouse and spread so rapidly??
• Elephant #2:  What evidence is there that the MLB protocol was violated in significant ways by the Marlins leading to the introduction of the virus and then the subsequent outbreak?
• Elephant #3:  Is there actually a “Patient Zero” within the Marlins’ organization?

There are other unanswered questions remaining, but those will do for the moment because with those questions in focus, the key question now is more transcendent:

• Does the MLB protocol – notwithstanding its 100+ pages in length – have any value with regard to the playing of MLB games in 2020?

That is the question that must be answered first.  If someone can indeed answer that in the affirmative with some basis other than arm-waving and wishful thinking, then we can move on to asking what the coronavirus compliance officer is supposed to do and what authorities he/she will have.  It seems obvious to me that even if every coronavirus compliance officer is a member of the Justice League of America, they will be less than successful in keeping COVID-19 away from MLB if in fact the protocol itself is flawed.

As they say in the infomercials, “But wait; there’s more!”

One might think that the MLBPA would be outraged by this outbreak at the start of the season.  After all, more than half of the expanded active roster for one of its teams is now COVID-19 positive; those union members were not protected by the protocol; the safety of workers and of working conditions has normally been a foundational piece in the reason for unions to exist in the first place.  So naturally, I assumed that the MLBPA would have their knickers in a knot over this and would be demanding new and better protective measures for its union brethren.  Let me put it this way; if indeed there is going to be a union outcry over this, it is more likely to be a whisper than a tirade.  According to reports, this is what the union has had to say about the outbreak:

1. MLB has proposed changing necessary double headers to either a pair of 7-inning games or a 9-inning game followed by a 7-inning game.  The MLBPA has endorsed the pair of 7-inning games and has urged the members to back that option too.
2. The expanded 30-man roster is set to be reduced to 28 players at the end of next week.  The MLBPA wants to extend the date of that roster contraction.

Player safety?  I guess they will get to that one of these weeks…

The reason that baseball officials – management and labor – ought to be focused on safety is that it now appears as if the Marlins’ “issues” may be a bit more commonplace that anyone would wish for.  John Heyman Tweeted this morning that today’s game between the Brewers and the Cardinals has been postponed because two Cards’ players have tested positive.  The firewall has been breeched again and in a different place.  So, is that misfortune or are the ramparts insufficient to meet the threat?

I think I have counted correctly.  There are 15 games in MLB that have been postponed due to coronavirus that will need to be made up.  There has been 1 postponement due to rain.

Enough gloom and doom for today…  There is a positive story out this week related to the NFL.  Alex Smith has been cleared by his doctors to go back to the Washington WTFs after almost 2 years away from football.  You may recall in the middle of the 2018 season, Smith suffered a grotesque injury in a game.  Since that time, he has undergone 17 separate surgeries to put his leg/ankle back together and to fight off a massive staph infection that he contracted somewhere along the line.   Coach Ron Rivera says that Smith will have a shot at the starting QB job once training camp begins IF Smith can pass the team’s “football physical”.

Frankly, if Alex Smith can simply take a snap from center, drop back and throw a pass in a practice environment, it will be a positive moment.  By all accounts, Alex Smith is one of the “good guys” in the sports world.  It is nice when something good happens to one of the good guys.

Finally, this comes from Dwight Perry in the Seattle Times:

“The Pentagon team tasked with studying UFOs — the Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Task Force — plans to publicly release information on its findings.

“So maybe we’ll finally get our answer: Did Otis Sistrunk really graduate from the University of Mars?”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

Everything – – and I do mean everything – – that I know about youth hockey in Canada comes from reading Gregg Drinnan’s blog Taking Note.  A posting there from earlier this week demonstrated to me that outrageous adult behavior related to youth sports is not confined to the US.  Here is a rough outline of what happened:

• The North American Hockey Classic (NAHC) is a tournament for multiple youth hockey teams ages 7 through 12.  It was held in Winnipeg; Winnipeg is in Manitoba.
• Five teams from Saskatchewan participated in this year’s NAHC.  According to an official in the Saskatchewan government, “Currently, inter-provincial travel is discouraged but not banned.  Inter-provincial travel for competition for tournaments is not permitted at this time.”

So, what’s the big deal?  The chronological adults nominally in charge of these teams misunderstood the regulations and  took a bunch of kids to do what kids do in Canada – – play hockey.  No one should get their bowels in an uproar over that.  Except … maybe – just maybe – those adults really did know that what they were doing was wrong because:

• They played in the tournament under team names different from the ones they normally play under.
• They withheld player names on the official game rosters.
• They forbid parents who accompanied the team from posting any pictures or comments on social media.

From everything I have read, junior hockey in Canada is a way of life and it has passionate and dedicated followers and supporters.  I guess it is like the atmosphere surrounding high school football in Texas.  Nonetheless, that does not excuse the team officials here.  What they did was wrong on multiple levels; here are only two such levels:

1. The travel restrictions are in place because of COVID-19.  Even if you want to argue that the travel and the participation only raised the likelihood of a child contracting the virus, adults in charge of entities involving children have a responsibility for safety and security.
2. What is the lesson for those kids (ages 7-12) to learn here?  If there is a rule or regulation that gets in your way, then what you should do is to figure out a way to circumvent that rule/regulation in such a way that you are not likely to get caught?

Even if you want to target government officials for promulgating ambiguous regulations here, the measures taken by those five teams is deplorable.  It probably does not good to say, “Shame on them,” because their behavior seems to indicate that they do not understand “shame”.  Go to Gregg Drinnan’s blog, Taking Note and read the July 28 posting for more details here.

Yesterday, I mentioned that the socially aware NBA would not be sporting any social justice icons or slogans that might offend the Chinese government because of the large revenue stream that flows to the NBA from China.  Today, there is a story from ESPN that there are multiple accusations of “child abuse” at some of the NBA Academies in China.  According to ESPN, a coach describes one of these academies as “a sweat camp for athletes” and the report says that several coaches have resigned over the treatment of athletes there.

There are reports of physical abuse of athletes and there are reports that the academics that kids are supposed to get there in parallel with their athletic training are lacking.  US coaches who were involved as overseers of the camps have resigned over the lack of academics and over the sub-standard living conditions associated with some of the academies.

The NBA should not go out of its way to offend the Chinese government and injure its revenue stream from China; after all, the NBA is a business and revenue matters.  The problem here is that the NBA begins to look like it is in the business of hypocrisy.  The NBA wants to be seen here as a change agent for social justice – – but it ignores horrible social injustices perpetrated by the folks in charge of its revenue stream and now it appears that it has lent its name and its “brand” to activities that qualify as child abuse.

My position here is pretty straightforward:

1. No one – anywhere – should seek to perpetrate social injustices.
2. People who abuse children are antediluvian pond slime.
3. The NBA ought not to try to be seen as an army of social justice warriors while also cozying up to folks who engage in the behaviors enumerated above.

Denver Nuggets’ forward, Michael Porter, Jr., is on record as a COVID-19 minimizer at best and maybe even a denier.  According to USA Today Porter says the virus is “being used to control people” and that it is “overblown”.  Here is some of what Porter had to say:

“Personally, I think the coronavirus is being used obviously for a bigger agenda.  It’s being used for population control just in terms of being able to control the masses of people.  Because this virus, the whole world is being controlled.  You’re required to wear masks and who knows what will happen when this vaccine comes out.  You might have to have the vaccine in order to travel, that’d be crazy.  I’ve never been vaccinated in my life; I’ve never had any shots or anything like that.”

Finally, here is a Tweet from humorist, Brad Dickson, at the intersection of sports, politics and COVID-19:

“You know the world is messed up when Mariano Rivera is attending the White House briefing and Dr. Anthony Fauci is warming up to take the mound at a major-league stadium.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

There is a twist to the upcoming NFL season that has not been present in the past and it is one that I think I understand – but am prepared to have someone correct/amend.  For the first time, players may opt-out of playing in the 2020 NFL season but that will not void their contract.  Instead the contract “will toll”.  My understanding of what that means is that in 2021 – when presumably COVID-19 will be harnessed – players can return to their teams and their contracts will simply have extended for a year.  They will make in 2021 the same salary that they would have made in 2020 had they opted in rather than opted out.

The league and the union put one more “pick and roll” – to borrow a phrase from basketball – to this situation.  Players may opt out for any reason at all and they will get an advance on the salary they will make in 2021 when they return to their teams:

• If a player opts out for a medical reason related to COVID-19, he will receive a salary advance of $350K
• If a player opts out for some other reason, he will receive a salary advance of $150K.

Before anyone asks, I do not know the mechanism by which there is an adjudication regarding what constitutes a “medical reason” for opting out as opposed to just a “garden variety” opting out.

I mention this today because players have until August 4^th to make their opt in/opt out decision for 2020.  However, as of this morning, 25 players have opted out for 2020 and 6 of those players are New England Patriots.  I have no idea why that is the case, but that surely represents an uneven distribution of players opting out.

In addition to this new feature for the 2020 season, there is also an unprecedented agreement between the league and the union regarding player behavior(s) off the field for the balance of the 2020 season.  Some of the provisions include a ban on players attending indoor nightclubs, indoor house parties with more than 15 attendees and indoor concerts and sporting events.  The penalty for violating these sorts of restrictions is a fine – – but there is a footnote here too:

• If a player engages in a prohibited behavior and subsequently comes down with COVID-19, then the player will be inactivated and will not be paid for the games that he misses.
• In addition, future guaranteed money in the players’ contract can be voided  [Translation:  Misbehave and catch COVID-19 and the fine you paid just got a lot bigger.]

This all sounds as if the league and the union are seriously committed to player safety and keeping the coronavirus out of team locker rooms – – and maybe they are.  However, the enforcement of these seemingly draconian behavioral constraints is left to the individual teams.  It does not make a lot of sense to me that something as apparently important as this – and with potentially severe penalties attached to it – would be subject to 32 differing methods of enforcement.

If these restrictions on behaviors off the field are in fact going to be enforced with the stipulated consequences, I think that NFL players should take a second look at the importance of social media in their lives.  Even without ascribing terminal stupidity to a player by suggesting that he might take a few selfies at a party or a nightclub or a concert and then post it himself on any one of the social media sites available today, social media can be a real hazard.  Nearly everyone has a cell phone; nearly everyone knows how to take pictures/video on that phone; nearly everyone knows how to post said photos/videos on social media.  Ergo, there are myriad sources for documenting potential player transgressions.

For the 2020 season, I make this suggestion to NFL players:

• Social media are not your friends…

Tomorrow night, the NBA will resurrect its 2020 season when the Jazz and the Pelicans take to the court.  In keeping with the NBA’s preferred image as a socially progressive organization, the phrase “Black Lives Matter” will be painted on the court and players will be allowed to wear social justice slogans or exhortations on their uniforms for the games.  This branding strategy on the part of the NBA is highly effective in terms of maintaining a connection with the players in the league and in terms of projecting positively to a significant portion of its fanbase.  Some have labeled the NBA’s actions on this front as brilliant.

If I were to apply the “brilliant” label here, I would have to include a dimension of the NBA’s strategy that no one says out loud.  The NBA has managed to put itself on a pedestal as a caring and progressive organization fighting for social justice reform – – and all the while being a party to social oppression when it is financially beneficial to the NBA to be a party to such social oppression.  If you think that is harsh, check out the games on TV and see if you see even a hint at social reform messages akin to :

• #FreeHongKong – – or – –
• #UighurLivesMatter

Finally, I missed any reporting on this topic completely, so I was interested to see this comment in Bob Molinaro’s column last week in the Hampton Roads Virginian-Pilot.  For the record, I am in total agreement:

“Public pressure: In a Japanese survey released this week, fewer than 24 percent of respondents favor holding the Summer Olympics in 2021. Without a vaccine, it won’t happen anyway.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

Eddie Shack died earlier this week.  I remember him from the mid-60s when I started to recognize ice hockey as a sport because the NHL was in the process of expanding from 6 to 12 teams.  He was a player you could not help but notice when he was on the ice.  He was part of the last Toronto Maple Leafs team to win the Stanley Cup .

Rest in peace, Eddie Shack.

It is always comfortable to look at complex situations in a simplistic manner; it makes them easier to understand.  The problem is that sometimes the easy/comfortable view does not allow one to think of complex consequences.  Consider the recently restarted MLB season.  The league and the players’ union agreed to a health and safety protocol that was more than 100 pages in length.  Logically – and simply – it defined what players/coaches/managers/etc. could and could not do, what they should and should not do, and what sorts of testing/tracing would be done for and by each team.  That seemed to compartmentalize everything so that each piece could be understood.

The problem is that reality bites and it only took 4 days into the 2020 delayed MLB season for reality to plant its teeth into MLB’s exposed posterior.  There is an unalterable fact about baseball games; they always involve two teams – – not just one.  And because COVID-19 can spread at a distance – in fact, that is most likely its most common vector for spreading – looking at individual teams as entities for safety protocols does not make a ton of sense.  Here is the current state of play:

• The Phillies and Marlins opened the season with a 3-game series.  Everything must have tested out to be hunky-dory as of last Friday; it would be outrageous to assume that MLB knew there was a COVID-19 problem with either team but let the games go on as scheduled anyway.  Anyone dumb enough to do that probably also thinks that a thumb drive is what a hitchhiker is looking for.
• At first, the Marlins had a player – maybe two – who tested positive and who “sat out”.  Makes sense; that is a foundational piece for the health and safety protocol.
• By Monday, however, at least 11 members of the Marlins – and maybe as many as 14 – have tested positive and because they have interacted with most of the Phillies roster for the last 3 days, the Yankees/Phillies game for Monday had to be postponed lest the Yankees be exposed.  Of particular concern must be the result that Marlins’ catcher, Jorge Alfaro, tested positive and catchers are the players most likely to interact with opposing teams at less than the social distancing guidelines for extended periods of time.
• Somehow, the Marlins became a viral hotspot all their own.  The health and safety protocol can now determine what the Marlins have to do to rid itself of that contagion.  The ability of MLB to identify how that many players came down with the virus will be a test of its ability to do contact tracing,  Moreover the schedules – and maybe the seasons – of the Phillies and/or any of the upcoming opponents of the Phillies might also be altered significantly if MLB cannot find the source of the Marlins’ contagion and it migrates to the Phillies’ clubhouse in a dormant/undetected state for 3 or 4 days..  The restarted season called for 60 games in 65 days; there is not a lot of room for “postponed games”; the Yankees and Phillies have already “spent” one of those off-days.

By the way, the Marlins/Orioles game scheduled for Monday was also canceled to avoid any more spread of the virus to the Orioles roster and because the Marlins might have difficulty fielding a team with 11-14 or more players on the shelf.

• Memo to MLB:  You may want to test any of the umpires who were on the field with 14 Marlins’ players who have tested positive over the weekend.  If umpires are infected, they can go to their next assigned game and pass on the virus to two other squads.  But you knew that…

There is another COVID-19/MLB note that is less than positive.  Red Sox pitcher, Eduardo Rodriguez, previously tested positive for COVID-19 but seemingly had recovered.  I say seemingly because the team shut him down over the weekend because an aftermath of his bout with COVID-19 is a cardiac inflammation.  Myocarditis – the medical name for his condition – can manifest itself with “rapid or abnormal heart rhythms” which in turn can “affect the heart’s ability to pump.”  That sounds to me a whole lot more serious than a respiratory infection – – unless of course that respiratory infection also includes a stay in an ICU facility.

I know that owners and players want seasons to go on for financial reasons.  If I had millions of dollars at stake, I would probably also want to take some risks to get the games into the books. However, the news from last weekend should be a cautionary tale.  COVID-19 is not to be taken lightly.

With all that MLB news as a backdrop, remember that the NBA will restart its season later this week.  It has had players/teams in the “Orlando Bubble” for a while and there have yet to be any positive tests there let alone an outbreak.  However, there is a teeny-tiny potential problem.

• Lou Williams, guard for the Clippers, will need to sit out a 10-day quarantine because he left the bubble for an “excused absence” but did not abide by safe practices while outside the bubble.
• Some reports say he went to a strip club in Atlanta – about 400 miles from Orlando; others say he went to get wings; maybe he got the wings at a strip club.  Whatever…
• Here is the caution; he was able to get out of the bubble with an excuse.  The way the league found out about his “improprieties” was a photo taken by someone and posted on Instagram.  The NBA “Bubble” is entirely dependent on chronologically adult players behaving intelligently should they leave “The Bubble”.  Good luck with that…

I think Lou Williams is the leader in the clubhouse for NBA Meathead of the Year…

Finally, Lakers’ center, Dwight Howard, tried to explain why he was stubbornly anti-mask wearing.  He said he was unaware that the coronavirus could be “flying through the air looking for people.”  How might he have thought that 4 million infections in the US managed to happen?

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

I went to Space.com this morning just to check; we are not close to a full moon; the last one was on July 5^th and the next one is on August 3^rd.  But there are strange doings out there this morning and I thought there might be some sort of lunar influence going on.  It seems to be just garden-variety bizarreness.

It seems that Mike Tyson is serious about returning to the boxing ring and it is not for a 3-round celebrity boxing match to raise money for some worthy cause.  The reports say that it will be an 8-round fight and the opponent will be Roy Jones, Jr.  Mike Tyson is 54 years old; Roy Jones, Jr. is 51 years old.  The fight is scheduled for September 12^th in a venue ironically named Dignity Health Sports Park in Carson, CA.  The only minor concession to age for the fight is that both men will wear larger gloves than standard boxing gloves.

The California sports body that oversees boxing has been assured by both fighters that they are not going into the fight with the intention to knock out or hurt the opponent.  Somehow, that makes the overseers prone to giving sanction to this exhibition.  For a normal fight, if the two combatants made the same sort of declaration, it might be considered disqualifying.  The only contingency standing in the way for Tyson and Jones is a physical exam for both men that still needs to happen.

Lots of folks associate George Foreman’s name with boxing at an advanced age.  Indeed, Foreman retired permanently from boxing at the age of 46.  Both Tyson and Jones are significantly older than that.  It is difficult to know what to expect for this fight.  The only thing that comes to mind as an analogy is a baseball “old-timers’ game”.  If you have ever seen one, you know that they are fun to watch – – once a year.  So, I have to hope that this fight is not a harbinger of a new concept for boxing…

Another strange event happened late last week when someone asked LaVar Ball a question – or maybe he just threw out a comment because he thought someone had a question in mind for him.  Let us all agree that La Var Ball is no stranger to oddball comments.  Here is the latest of his mental constructs:

• IF the Golden State Warriors were to draft his youngest son, LaMelo Ball in this year’s NBA Draft, LaVar things that LaMelo should start even though the Warriors backcourt is populated with Steph Curry and Klay Thompson.
• When “confronted” with that roster reality, LaVar doubled down on his assertion saying that while it is true that players like Kawhi Leonard and Giannis Antetokounmpo came off the bench as rookies, “OK, Michael Jordan didn’t come off the bench.”

Where to start to deal with that analogy?  The best place is to acknowledge that LaVar is factually correct; Michael Jordan did not come off the bench as a rookie in the NBA.  What Michael Jordan brought with him to the NBA, however, was a bit different from the experiences that LaMelo Ball will bring to the NBA.

• Michael Jordan played 3 years at UNC – winning a national championship there.  He played for a great coach and played against lots of future NBA players.
• LaMelo Ball has played a bit in a Lithuanian basketball league and for part of a season in an Australian pro league.  I will not pretend to know anything about his time in either league because I acknowledge that I did not see him perform there.  I know nothing about Lithuanian pro basketball; I do recall watching a couple of Australian games back when Andrew Bogut was coming out of that league and became a “draft sensation”.  I remember that I liked Bogut as a player, but I did not see any other players there who looked like NBA prospects.

I do not intend to denigrate LaMelo Ball as a basketball player; he will deservedly be a high draft pick in this year’s NBA Draft to be held in mid-October in this year of strange schedules.  Nonetheless, I think it is way beyond over-the-top to compare him in any way to Michael Jordan at this point in his career.  In fact, the player with whom I would compare him right now is his brother Lonzo Ball.  It appears to me that LaMelo should be a better scorer than Lonzo but that Lonzo is the better distributor/point guard.  That might be a discussion based in reality; comparing LaMelo Ball to Michael Jordan in 2020 is like comparing Pee Wee Herman to Lionel Barrymore.

The other oddball event that relates to the sports world is the reported start of an investigation by the US State Department Inspector General into allegations that the US Ambassador to the UK, Woody Johnson, made racist and sexist remarks in the course of his duties as Ambassador.  The reason this has anything to do with sports is that Woody Johnson is the majority owner of the NY Jets.  This report from CNN.com will fill you in on the background to this story if you are interested.

I can picture the scene in Roger Goodell’s office when a staff member gives him the “breaking news” on this story.  In my imagination, Goodell reaches into his desk and takes out a ball peen hammer and begins to pound it into his forehead.  After doing that a few times the staffer asks The Commish why he is doing that to which Roger Goodell replies:

“Because it feels good when I stop.”

The NFL does not need another allegation of sexism involving one of its owners any more than a drowning man needs a cinder block.  The league had to rid itself of Jerry Richardson over similar issues about 2 years ago; in the last two weeks, the Washington WTFs were the focus of stories pertaining to sexual harassment and a toxic work culture for women in its front office.  Now this…

Obviously, I have no way to predict the outcome(s) of the State Department Inspector General’s investigation.  From reading several reports of the ambassador’s behavior and remarks, they are “off-center” at the very least and – as one person supposedly characterized his remarks about women in the embassy – close to “cringeworthy”.

Then again, learning about sexist remarks from a person named Woody Johnson ought not to be that shocking…

Finally, since I mentioned the maelstrom that is the front office of the Washington WTFs, let me close today with this observation by Bob Molinaro in the Hampton Roads Virginian-Pilot:

“Just asking: Why was it treated as sorta big news that Ron Rivera said he has ‘no regrets’ about taking the Washington job? What did we expect him to say? Snyder’s money still spends.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………