Category: Daily Rants

Over the weekend, I was grazing through the channels on my cable subscription and happened across the PGA event of the week.  I did not linger awfully long because golf on TV is not a way that I spend a lot of my time, but I was immediately aware of something “new” in the telecast.  There were real live fans in attendance, and I could hear them.  It was not a soundtrack pumped into the telecast; these were reactions from actual human beings on site at the event.  That got me to thinking about other sports on TV and how their telecasts have been altered by the COVID-19 pandemic.  So, in no particular order:

• Golf:  I have never thought that the goofs who yell “Get in the hole!” on every drive off the tee added much to the telecast, but the polite applause accompanying routine shots gave a sense of reality to the contest last weekend.
• NHL:  I do not watch as much hockey as I do many other sports, but the telecasts seemed pretty much the same with soundtracks as opposed to live fans in the arena.
• NFL:  The absence of dozens of gratuitous crowd shots and minimized sideline reporting made the games more enjoyable; the soundtracks were so obviously phony that they detracted from the presentation.  The net change here is a wash…
• College Football:  Frankly, seeing the way some games had fans in the stands without masks and clearly not exhibiting social distancing made me feel uncomfortable given the COVID-19 situation in the Fall of 2020.  I found myself wanting to avert my eyes during the crowd shots with fans jamming together to cheer for their team on camera and on cue.  Not a good look there…
• MLB:  The telecasts last year were not significantly different with empty stands and/or cardboard cutouts.  The piped in audio was not nearly as artificial in baseball telecasts as it was in other sports.  I must admit that having seen a few innings of some Spring Training games this last week has given me the urge to go and see a baseball game live this year.  The presence of live folks on the camera shots makes me envious; I did not have that feeling last season.
• NBA:  The most glaring change in the telecasts to me was the absence of celebrities in their courtside seats behaving in ways to draw attention to themselves as if they were part of the game itself.  The audio soundtracks were often handled clumsily so there was a feeling that what I was watching was not “real”.
• College Basketball:  This is the sport where the biggest difference existed for me.  Watching Duke play a home game without the “Cameron Crazies” packed into the stands screaming and jumping up and down for the entirety of the action just seemed wrong.  However, limiting crowds was/is the right thing to do…
• Tennis:  The little of it that I did watch seemed to be pretty much the same presentation without fans as it was with fans in the stands.
• Horse Racing:  Other than crowd shots during Triple Crown events or the Breeders’ Cup races, TV cameras do not focus on fans in attendance.  [Aside:  As a denizen of the grandstand and “down by the rail” at many racetracks, I can assure you that there are good reasons for the cameras to focus attention elsewhere.]  The typical race telecasts on TVG looked the same in 2020 as they have for as long as horse racing has been on TV.
• English Premier League:  I missed the fans singing their traditional songs.  I had never realized that I had paid attention to that part of the telecast before until it was not part of the telecast and I wondered where it had gone.
• Australian Rules Football:  I did not notice any difference in the telecasts here.  The thing that I would hate to see happen in this sport is if they change the “costumes” of the guys at the goal who signal with their hands if there is a goal or a behind.

With increasing availability – and administration – of COVID-19 vaccines, the television presentations of sports going forward will likely drift back to what they were prior to 2020.  On balance, that is probably a good thing.

The Dallas Cowboys and Dak Prescott reached a “long-term deal” yesterday.  I put quotation marks here because the deal is for 4 years and many contracts for NFL franchise QBs extend well beyond that term.  Notwithstanding the relative brevity of the deal, there are some big numbers and restrictive covenants associated with it:

• Total contract value with the attainment of all incentives could be as high as $164M.
• Guaranteed money comes to $126M.
• Signing bonus is $66M.
• There is a no-trade clause.
• There is a clause that prevents the Cowboys from using the franchise tag on Prescott at the end of this contract.

Looking at the max value of the deal, Dak Prescott will make $41M per year on average; looking only at the guaranteed money, he will average out to $31.5M per year.  Either way, that is a whole lot of cheese AND at the end of this deal, Dak Prescott will be only 31 years old and can take another bite of the “free agency apple” at that time.  My first reaction to reading about this deal was that Prescott and his people made Jerry Jones blink in their game of chicken over a long-term deal.  Indeed, the Cowboys get some QB stability here – – but not for long.  And then this free agency/new contract opera will fire up again.

Then, I thought again.  Jerry Jones has demonstrated two things over the 30+ years he has owned the Cowboys:

1. He seems to over-value his football personnel expertise just a bit; his role as the team’s GM has been spotty in terms of roster building.
2. His financial performance is anything but spotty; Jerry Jones takes large financial gambles inside football and outside football and he wins an inordinate fraction of those financial bets.

So, when I look at this as a “financial risk” taken by Jerry Jones, I have to think he has an angle on it.  Maybe he already knows how big the next set of TV rights deals are going to be for the NFL and where the salary cap is heading?

Finally, since I began today with comments on telecasts, let me close with this item from Dwight Perry in the Seattle Times:

“Sure sign we’ve been in lockdown too long: The Milwaukee Bucks unveiled a  ‘Hand Sanitizer Cam’ featuring a superimposed bottle ‘squirting’ fans in the stands.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

Les Miles is out as the head football coach at Kansas; according to reports, the parties here “mutually agreed to part ways”.  I take that to mean they have agreed to buy out Miles’ contract at a discounted value, but I have no direct knowledge of the terms and conditions there.  The issue causing this separation is a report that surfaced a few days ago related to an investigation at LSU.  According to the report, Miles behaved inappropriately toward women there when he was the head coach at LSU.

If the investigation at LSU is accurate and complete, Les Miles should have been fired by LSU if they had known at the time what was ongoing inside the football program.  There is some indication that some of this malfeasance was known because the report suggests that the AD at LSU wanted to fire Miles “for cause” as far back as 2013.  [Aside:  Miles stayed in that job until 2016.]

The fact that Les Miles had compiled a record of 3-18 at Kansas over the past two years did not give him much ammunition with which to put up a fight here.  The Jayhawks were 0-9 in the truncated 2020 season and 3-9 in Miles’ first season on the sidelines.  Moreover, 8 of those 9 losses in 2020 were by 15 points or more.  Jeff Long, the AD at Kansas, tried to put a smiley face on this matter with this statement:

“I am extremely disappointed for our university, fans and everyone involved with our football program.  There is a lot of young talent on this football team, and I have no doubt we will identify the right individual to lead this program. We will begin the search for a new head coach immediately with an outside firm to assist in this process. We need to win football games, and that is exactly what we’re going to do.”

I recognize that Jeff Long had to say what he did, but that statement makes clear that the athletic department at Kansas is not particularly efficient nor effective.  Consider 3 points:

1. Granted the investigation at LSU and the report dealing with the investigation had not happened in 2019 when Miles was hired at Kansas, but the events took place years before that.  So, might it be fair to say that the athletic department did not perform sufficient due diligence in that hiring process?
2. Athletic Director Long said they will use an “outside firm to assist” in finding a new coach.  Really?  The athletic department did not have a contingency plan in the event that Coach Miles was trampled by a runaway buffalo?  Kansas is in one of the Power 5 conferences; it is the doormat of that conference; any young and upcoming coach who might make Kansas respectable would goose up his career and his coaching value immensely.  And the AD at such a school does not have a couple such young coaches on his radar and the phone numbers of the agents for those young coaches on his rolodex?  To me, that is stunning…
3. Jeff Long – presumably with the assistance of an “outside firm to assist” – hired Les Miles for the coaching job two years ago.  The imperative to “win football games” was surely there at that time as well as now.  Nonetheless, the outcome of that coaching search resulted in a two-year record of 3-18.  Now, the same process will swing into action again.  Hope springs eternal …

There was another report from ESPN.com yesterday that made me shake my head.  According to that report, Jeffrey Lurie – Philadelphia Eagles’ owner – directed the team’s coaching staff and team personnel people to “build around Jalen Hurts” as the team QB in 2021.  Let me set the stage here:

• Jalen Hurts started 4 games in 2020; the Eagles were 1-3 in those 4 games.  In the game the Eagles won – over the Saints in New Orleans – Hurts played well and looked like a solid pick in the second round of the 2020 Draft.  In the next 3 games his performances were not nearly as compelling – – but until the final game against the WTFs, he did not embarrass himself or the team.  In that final game he and the rest of the team and the coaching staff basically threw up all over their shoes.
• The jury is out on Jalen Hurts as an NFL QB.  He may be the next Russell Wilson; he may alternatively be the next Brock Osweiler; there is simply insufficient evidence to make that call in March 2021.

Assuming that the report on ESPN.com is accurate, Jeffrey Lurie is on a dangerous trajectory here.  He supposedly has been a sports fan all his life and has owned the Eagles for about 25 years.  In terms of the expertise needed to “make a call” on who ought to be the team’s starting QB, I believe I have listed all his credentials there.  And that is why this is a dangerous trajectory and that is why Jeffrey Lurie should step back, take a deep breath and cast his gaze on two of his fellow team owners.  Two other owners have inserted themselves into the determination of their teams’ QBs and neither franchise was the better for it.

1. Daniel Snyder has reportedly done this 4 times in his 20 years of owning an NFL team.  The QBs he “championed” were Jeff George (at the end of George’s career), Patrick Ramsey (who Snyder claimed to have “discovered”) RG3 and Dwayne Haskins.  The team record during Snyder’s ownership – along with his QB “guidance” – is a cumulative 139-196-1.
2. Jimmy Haslam reportedly did this only once when he supposedly over-ruled his folks conducting the Draft and had them select Johnny Manziel with the Browns’ second pick in the first round in 2014.  Haslam has not been known for top-shelf selections in other areas of the “football side” of the franchise either and the team record in full seasons since he took over in mid-stream in 2012 is a cumulative 39-88-1.

Jeffrey Lurie hired a GM, personnel folks, scouts and a coaching staff presumably with the thought in his mind that those folks know more about football than a fanboy does.  Jeffrey Lurie has two negative examples of what may happen when owners make player decisions not in consonance with the decisions of the “football people”.  Instead of caveat emptor (Buyer beware!) this seems to be a situation of caveat dominus (Owner beware!)

Finally, having mentioned two NFL owners – and potentially a third – who may fall victim to the sin of hubris, let me close with a pertinent observation by historian Erik Larsen:

“The Lusitania is a monument … to the hubris of the era. I love that, because where there is hubris, there is tragedy.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

An item in Bob Molinaro’s column last week in the Hampton Roads Virginian-Pilot reminded me that I have not spent sufficient time here talking about “amateur” sports recently.  Here is the item that triggered me:

“Gub-mint unleashed: By a vote of 36-0, the Kentucky state senate passed a bill allowing high school seniors to stay for another year and play sports. Silly, right? Picture years from now, an old man boasting to his grandchildren that the best time of his life was his fifth year of high school.”

I do not know what is worse here – – the idea of bringing back high school kids for another year in school so they can play sports or that the recorded vote in the Kentucky state senate was 36-0.  None of those chronological adults in the state senate thought this might not be a great idea to put into law?

I know that the nominal Class of 2020 and 2021 caught a tough break with COVID-19 interrupting their acts of glory on the field and on the court and in the pool.  I recognize that politicians would surely not want to do anything that would not cater to the suffering that all those high school athletes might have endured in the past year.  I believe that politicians would want to be able to wave a magic wand and make it all better for all those kids who lost out on athletic glory for reasons beyond their control.  And now I would pose this question to the state senators from Kentucky:

• What have you done to the athletes in the Class of 2022 who would have been the “top dogs” on their high school teams but will now have to cede some of that limelight to these returning super-seniors? 
• How might you plan on making that up to the Class 0f 2022?  Where might this end beyond the idea that high school in Kentucky goes from 9^th grade through 13^th grade?

In another wing of the “amateur sports” silliness of the moment we have the fact that the NCAA will indeed hold an NIT Tournament again in 2021.  There was a day when the NIT was far more prestigious than the NCAA basketball tournament; those were the days before the invention of “TV Dinners”.  The NIT has been relegated to the category of “afterthought-at-best” for about 60 or 70 years; its death knell was when it sued the NCAA for “monopolistic practices” and then settled that suit just before trial by agreeing to be bought out by the NCAA.

In a “concession” to COVID-19, the NCAA decided that this year’s NIT field would be reduced from 32 teams few if any fans gave a fig about to 16 teams that “aspire to relevancy”.  Because when this year’s tournament was being organized, New York – – home of Madison Square Garden where the NIT flourished in its glory days and where the NIT Finals had taken place in its declining years – – was being extremely cautious about fans in arenas, the NCAA chose to move the NIT games to Texas.

Given the proclamation of the Texas Governor last week, Texas is now “100% open” meaning that the NIT games can take place in indoor venues with full capacity seating and with no mask mandates or health screenings or – – you fill in the blank here.

• Memo to the NCAA:  Your junior varsity post-season men’s basketball tournament now has the potential to be a highly visible pandemic super-spreader event.  If you think that it is a good thing to have attached to “the NCAA Brand”, may I suggest that linking “the NCAA Brand” to Typhoid Mary is not a good thing?

No charge for that advice…

Once again, Bob Molinaro has cut through the fog here to provide clarity on the core issue(s) here:

“Tex-mess: Now that the college basketball anachronism called the NIT has been moved from New York to wide-open Texas, expect some teams to take a pass. Not to mention that the three-week-long NCAA women’s tournament must deal with mask-less Texans. Good luck, ladies.”

The NY Times had a report last week about a new basketball league for players who have graduated from high school – – whatever that may mean in Kentucky is no longer clear – – who want to do something other than play a one-and-done year in college basketball.  Please recall that LaVar Ball had set up one of these enterprises in the recent past; I suggest that it should be remembered as the Constipation Basketball League – – because it passed quickly.

Here is the new idea…

• The Overtime Elite League will offer high school players salaries of $100K (plus some benefits on top of that salary) to skip college and play for the League.  It would employ approximately 30 players but not on fixed teams.  It would almost be like a “barnstorming league” where teams would be fluid from game to game.
• For a much more complete description of the basis for the new league check out this link to the NY Times article that describes it.

I believe that this is the hurdle that the Overtime Elite League – or any other league that seeks to monetize the performance of high school basketball players – must surmount:

• It must provide to the high school player taking that $100K salary and thereby forfeiting any NCAA eligibility an equivalent exposure of that player and the “brand” that player seeks to develop.
• Saying exactly nothing about which of the two is the “better player”, which player entered the NBA with more hype/recognition?  Zion Williamson or LaMelo Ball?  And remember, LaMelo Ball was being touted by his father and his older brothers for about 4 years before he was in the NBA Draft.
• The Overtime Elite League – or any other entity of that stripe – will need to find ways to allow its’ star players to become ‘household names”.  As a test, answer this question.
• Give me the names of the high school players who opted not to play college basketball this year and took NBA backed G-League contracts.  I shall not hold my breath while you go to Google to find those names…

Finally, I often close these rants with an entry from The Official Dictionary of Sarcasm.  Since turnabout is fair play, let me share today, this definition of “sarcasm” sent to me by a former colleague:

“Sarcasm:  The ability to insult idiots without them realizing it.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

Later this month, the NFL owners will convene, and they will have at least 4 rule change proposals on their agenda.  For a new rule to be adopted, 24 of the 32 owners would need to approve.  Three of the four rules are toward the radical end of the spectrum; the fourth is actually retrograde.  Today, I will take a dive into these four rules proposals; let me start with the “retrograde” proposal.

• This change would “simplify” overtime games by returning to the “sudden death” mode.  Teams flip a coin to begin overtime and the first team to score in any fashion wins the game.  If neither team scores in a 10-minute overtime period, the game goes in the books as a tie.

That rule gives a significant advantage to the team that wins a coin flip and I do not like that aspect at all.  It also puts a premium on a team’s defensive performance because the team that kicks off in OT has to defend against the opponent advancing to the defense’s 30-yardline because that is “field goal territory”.  Placing a premium on defensive play is a plus for me.  On balance, I prefer the current rule that requires each team to posses the ball unless the original possession results in a TD or a safety.

The second rule proposal has been on the table before and failed to get the necessary 24 votes to implement it:

• In the fourth quarter, onside kicks would be replaced by a team attempting a “fourth-and-15 play” from its own 35-yardline. If the play succeeds, the team maintains possession and continues its drive from wherever the play ends; if unsuccessful, the defense gets the ball wherever that play ends.

I have no love for onside kicks, but I also do not like adding such a contrivance as a conjured up “fourth-and-15 play” out of thin air.  Frankly, I really do not care how the owners deal with this proposal.

The third and fourth rule change proposals are closely related, and they are radical changes to the way overtime games would happen.  These changes have been labeled “spot and choose”.

• At the beginning of overtime, there is a coin flip.  The team winning the toss would declare where the ball will be put in play; the team losing the choice would choose to play offense or defense from that point on the field.
• Variation #1:  The game is sudden death from that point; any score wins the game, but the OT period is limited to 10 minutes.  If neither team scores, the game is a tie.
• Variation #2:  The OT period runs 7 minutes and 30 seconds no matter who scores first.  The winner is the team that is leading when the overtime clock reaches zero; there can be multiple scores in the overtime period.  If the score is tied when the clock reaches zero, the game is a tie.

I like the idea of “spot and choose” for two reasons.  It does not give a significant advantage to the team winning a coin flip and it adds another element of strategy to the game.  For example, suppose Team #1 wins the toss and it has a dominant defense.  It could choose to put the ball at the 5-yardline giving Team #2 the choice of an awfully long field or the choice of giving Team #1 the ball at the 5-yardline which is chip shot field goal range in the sudden death variant.

Because I prefer for tie games to be decided by playing the same game that produced the tie in the first place, I would prefer Variation #2 above.  Sudden death is a concocted circumstance, and I would prefer to have a game wind up as a tie than to stray too far from the normal football game that got us to the point of overtime.  [Aside:  This is why I do not like penalty kicks in soccer; shootouts in hockey; runners on second base in extra innings in baseball …]

I do not see the owners going back to sudden death such that one team faces the possibility of never possessing for ball; I believe the current argot here would be “a bad optic”.  The owners did not like the idea of replacing the onside kick once before and I cannot recall a circumstance where an onside kick generated a huge controversy in the last year or so.  Therefore, I cannot see why any of the opposing owners would have changed their mind on the issue.  I would be surprised if either of those rules makes it into the books for 2022.

“Spot and choose” is such a radical idea that the owners are either going to love it and adopt it or they will hate it such that no one will ever propose it again.  That is the rule proposal to keep an eye on as the owners’ meeting gets closer.  That is an issue where an “NFL Insider” might be able to shed some light on the thought processes of supporters and/or opponents here.

Finally, as the NFL owners ponder the implications of these rule proposals, let me suggest they keep in mind these words from George Bernard Shaw:

“The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

There was “breaking news” yesterday regarding the Washington Football Team’s cheerleading squad.  No, the “breaking news” had nothing to do with the now 8-month long investigation into sexual harassment and “toxic workplace” allegations brought against the team – and obliquely against the owner.  And no, there was not any announcement that the NFL had agreed with various activist groups that the results of that investigation – – whenever and if ever it is completed – – would be made public with only minor redactions.  Instead of any important “breaking news”, here is what went down regarding that issue yesterday:

• The WTFs will not have a cheerleading squad this year – – and presumably into the future – – but will replace that unit with a co-ed dance team.

I know; it is enough to take your breath away…

That announcement is about as important as nose hairs on a statue; cheerleaders for NFL teams are worthless and co-ed dance teams for NFL teams are no better.  At its absolute best, consider this announcement by the team – and obliquely by the NFL – as a means to divert attention to the fact that after 8 months of “investigating”, there are no findings regarding sexual harassment and a “toxic work environment” for female cheerleaders there.

In an earlier part of my professional life, I had the responsibility of conducting inquiries into formally filed workplace grievances.  It was not nearly the most fun part of my career, but I survived it.  Never once did I have a “case” that required 8 months of “digging” to come up with whatever facts could be gleaned along with the perceptions/opinions of parties to the grievance and close peripheral parties.  I have no idea what 8 months of billable hours by a law firm looking into this matter might mean in terms of a cash outlay by the team and/or the league; but sight unseen, I would have taken the job fixed price for half of that total.

Regarding the current “announcement” that the NFL media managed to turn into “Breaking News”, here are a few statements that give you an idea of the pablum involved:

“With [a co-ed dance team] comes inclusivity, diversity and in my mind, as an entertainer, athleticism.  My desire is to create a team that is all of that — inclusive, diverse, coed, athletic — to set the gold standard in the NFL. We’re looking for that super athlete that can dance, perform tricks and stunts and manipulate whatever props that will create a really great show.”  [Petra Pope – newly hired by the WTFs as a senior advisor to create game-day entertainment for a more modern franchise.]

“Change can be extremely difficult.  I appreciate the passion that the ladies have and can relate to that passion because I’ve been a mentor for thousands of dancers over my career.  As we progress to a reimagined era, the choreography will be much more athletic. We welcome the dancers of the past to audition, and if they have that skill set, they’re welcome to join us. [Petra Pope – addressing the fact that former cheerleaders had been “released” and might not be included in the new squad.]

The new team president for the WTFs, Jason Wright, said that the team was trying to emulate the NBA experience and to provide a game-day experience that was similar to the NBA.  Here is his take on this announcement:

“As we set out to modernize the Washington Football gameday, it’s important that we develop a top-notch entertainment program that keeps our fanbase excited and connected to the game and the team.”

• Memo to Jason Wright:  If 20% of your gameday fans would even notice the absence or presence of cheerleaders or dance squads, I would be shocked.  Your gameday experience will be enhanced much more by better food, cheaper parking and a better product on the field.  No charge for that advice…

Meanwhile, as MLB’s Spring Training has moved ahead from workouts to exhibition games that too many folks will take as portents of things to come in September/October 2021, please think back just a few days to appreciate the content of this item in Dwight Perry’s column, Sideline Chatter in the Seattle Times:

“Tim Hunter of Everett’s WRKO Radio, on the first day of spring training: ‘The day that pitchers and catchers start complaining about having to come back sooner than the rest of the team.’”

And as we draw close to the event that most folks seem not to want to happen – – the NBA All-Star Game – – consider these pragmatic words from Bob Molinaro in the Hampton Roads Virginian-Pilot:

“New rule: Any NBA player who complains that a colleague was snubbed in the All-Star selection process must name the player he’d remove from the team.”

Why didn’t I think of that?  My credentials as a curmudgeon have taken a significant hit there…

Finally, apropos of nothing other than my liking for H.L. Mencken, here is one of his observations from about 80 years ago that still has resonance:

“The typical American of today has lost all the love of liberty that his forefathers had, and all their disgust of emotion, and pride in self-reliance.  He is led no longer by Davy Crocketts; he is led by cheer leaders, press agents, word-mongers, uplifters.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

In the wake of yesterday’s rant about excessive Tiger Woods media coverage, I received a critique from someone who has been a friend for about 60 years.  At one time in his life, he was a staff writer for People magazine – – in the days when People was arguably the most influential magazine in the country.  Here is the relevant portion of his e-mail critique:

“I have no complaints about your story. I rather like it.  But … you should realize that what you were trying to do — diminish the importance of celebrity in our society — is hopeless.  I  beg you to forsake this noble crusade.  You will lead a happier life if you do so.

“Tiger Woods is as important to America as Princess Diana was to Great Britain.  Well, almost.  But he was and is at the very top of the pantheon of publicity-worthy Americans.  The stories will never cease, and America will mourn — maybe flags at half-mast — when he finally rolls his car over and dies in flames.

“You know what?  I’ll miss him, too.

“Last comment:  As a columnist, you should pick the fights you have a chance of winning, and this isn’t one of them.  And if you continue to do such stories because you believe it is in the public good to speak out, you probably should mention somewhere high up in the piece that you know it is a battle you cannot win but you believe the fight is a good and noble one.”

Color me chastened.  I shall try to resist the temptation to fulminate on this topic too often in the future.  I guess I am as obsessed about my view of this situation as are the golf writers who cannot cover any aspect of the game unless it is through the prism of Tiger Woods.  Point taken …

There is another category of “sports celebrity” that receives coverage on a sporadic basis.  Tiger Woods is not in this category; Tiger Woods does not need the coverage to live a contented life; members of this “other category” need to be part of the conversation.  My favorite person in this “Need to be seen/heard category” is José Canseco.  About once every 6 months, I can count on him to do or say something outrageous that puts him in the spotlight for a day or so.  My favorite of his antics was when he suggested that he had a plan to expand the US economy by 25% and suggested to former President Trump that he be named either Treasury Secretary or Fed Chairman (I forget when post he “sought”.)

Another sports figure who seems to be squarely in the “Need to be seen/heard category” is Terrell Owens.  However, if T.O. wants to climb the ladder in that category, he will need to expand the spectrum of the outrageousness of his publicity seekings.  To this point, T.O. seems to have only 3 main behaviors that might put him in the news for a day or so:

1. He can toss out some “new morsel” of information about his feud with Donovan McNabb.
2. He can proclaim that he could be a #1 receiver in the NFL today if a team gave him a chance.
3. He can continue his boycott of the Pro Football Hall of Fame.

The first of those behaviors has a long shelf-life.  The second one is fast approaching its sell-by date.  The third one has pretty much run its course.  Anyone who cares even marginally about T.O.’s boycott of the Hall of Fame knows the story and realizes that there is minimal meat on that bone.  T. O. tried to resurrect that story about a month ago and it went over like a roast beef recipe in a Vegan cookbook.

In case you missed it, T. O. remains well beyond chagrined that he was not elected to the Hall of Fame on the first ballot and was even more miffed this year confronted with the fact that Calvin Johnson was elected to the Hall of Fame on the first ballot.  Recall that T.O. boycotted the induction ceremony in Canton, OH and staged his own ceremony at his alma mater – Tennessee-Chattanooga.

Here is a prediction:

• Next year – and the year after that – when the electors for the Pro Football Hall of Fame announce the new members for the Hall of Fame proximal to the Super Bowl, T. O. will find a way to get a reporter or a sports radio host to give him an opportunity to opine on a player who was elected or one who was not elected – – but T. O. is sure he should have been.

I have no idea if his “take” will be full of sound and fury – – but I am confident that it will signify nothing.  [Hat Tip to Billy Shakespeare there…]  However, the folks on “Radio Row” at the Super Bowl will feast on the opportunity to fill a segment with whatever is the pronouncement of the day from T. O. and he will bask in a few days of limelight.

Now here is the head-exploding circumstance for T.O.  Should this come to pass, he will be on radio shows and SportsCenter and in papers around the country for the better part of a week:

• Donovan McNabb – – the Hatfield to Owens’ McCoy – – is a finalist for induction to the Hall of Fame.

That would combine two of his tree categories for getting his name in the news; it would be a second Christmas in the Owens’ household…

Finally, since today’s rant has dealt with “celebrity” and “celebrity status” to a large degree, let me close with an observation about celebrity from historian, Daniel J. Boorstin:

“A sign of celebrity is that his name is often worth more than his services.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

Last Wednesday, I was writing about the Tiger Woods car crash in LA.  Please allow me to pull two items from that commentary:

“The golf media who created his [Woods’] celebrity persona – and then feasted on it to provide that media with “stories” – needs to let this man recover and find the life he wants for himself without 24/7 inspection and intrusion from outside.”

And …

“ … I hope the golf media finds a way to do a bit of introspection here.  The amount of coverage for this single car crash with severe injuries and zero fatalities is only justified because of the hyper-attention focused on Tiger Woods for about the last 25 years. … My hope is that the golf media can find a way to express their sorrow for his pain and to wish him a speedy and full recovery – – and then to find someone else to focus on.”

Well – – none of that seems to be happening.  I am going to cite work done by two Washington Post reporters here and I want to make clear that I enjoy the work that both normally do.  However, they too have fallen into the golf version of a black hole where nothing can emanate from it unless it has to do with Tiger Woods.

In last Friday’s edition of the Washington Post Sports Section, Chuck Culpepper had a story that began at the bottom of the from page of that section under this headline:

• “In the long shadow of Woods, PGA Tour pros play through”

The opening round of the week’s PGA event had taken place; Tiger Woods was not “absent” because it was never a possibility he would be in the field.  The event was in southern California and Tiger Woods was in a hospital in Florida recovering from surgery on his leg(s) such that he may need to learn how to walk once again.  But the story of the golf tournament is only worthy of front-page coverage because it can be tied somehow to Tiger Woods’ absence? Chuck Culpepper is a whole lot better than that!

Fast forward from Friday to Sunday in the Washington Post Sports Section. Page 8 of that section is devoted entirely to coverage of golf.  There are two photos on the page:

1. One is a photo of Tiger Woods with his son Charlie in a father/son event from last year.  It covers 40.7 square inches on the page.
2. The other photo is of Collin Morikowa – the leader and eventual winner of the ongoing PGA event of last week.  That photo covers 25.9 square inches on the page.

Hmmm…

So, maybe the golf folks and the sports mavens at the Washington Post figure that a sentimental photo of Tiger Woods with his son is a valuable image in this less-than-positive time in Woods’ life.  I will give all of them that – – until I look at the rest of the page devoted to “golf news”.  There are 3 stories on the page:

1. The first is a compilation from the Associated Press about the status of the PGA Tour ongoing event, the LPGA Tour ongoing event and the PGA Tour Champions ongoing event.  Those “roundups” consist of 12 column-inches not counting for headline space.
2. The second story is about how the car accident involving Tiger Woods was not a shock to residents in the area where it happened.  As had been reported for days by the time of time article, the accident occurred at a place where traffic accidents were commonplace on a hilly, winding road.  That story consisted of 26.5 column-inches not accounting for headline space.
3. The third story was by Dave Sheinin – who is as good a reporter as there is on a sports page that I read regularly.  It was a hagiography of Tiger Woods from the time he was a teenage phenom through the present day when the story concludes if this is the end of Tiger’s Era, “we can permit ourselves a few moments of wistfulness for what was lost.”  That story consisted of 32 column-inches not counting for headline space.

The Washington Post is a major news outlet; this is not a weekly local paper whose sports coverage rarely extends beyond the achievements of the local high school.  Five days after a traffic accident, they devote about 5 times more space to the accident and the person in the accident than to “ongoing sporting events”?  Cut it out!  Let this man heal from his injuries – – if in fact that is the final outcome here – – and cover sports in the Sports Section.  This is the kind of hyper fascination I would expect from something like the Eastern New Mexico News (Clovis, NM) about a local golfer who had made it on the big time PGA Tour.

Moreover, even if the only sin committed here was supremely over-covering a traffic accident days after the event, there is a need for a smattering of journalistic honesty here.  Remember, what I want to be the outcome here is that Tiger Woods can make a recovery such that he can indeed play golf again; I do not wish him any sort of evil outcome at all.  Nonetheless, let me say a couple of things that golf reporters seem terrified to say:

1. Please remember, this is not the first time Tiger Woods has been in a car accident.  There was that time when a fire hydrant leaped out in front of his vehicle and caused a crash and his then-wife had to rescue him by breaking the window with a 9-iron.
2. Please recall that he was arrested and charged with a DUI.  If you do not believe that, go to Google Images and search for “Tiger Woods DUI” and you can see the mug shots.
3. Please stop saying that Tiger Woods is “lucky to be alive”.  He is just as lucky not to have killed anyone driving innocently on the other side of that roadway.  Just as he is lucky not to have killed anyone during the previous “DUI incident”.

If sports writers and golf writers feel compelled to write about this traffic accident, can they please stop the idolatry and write about it as if an odious sports figure had been behind the wheel.  There are no more reasons for a recount of the accident details unless there is new information from forensic experts that impinge on the case.  Let that poor man heal and go through rehab – – and then maybe they can write something about the greatest return known to man since Lazarus.

Finally, I can easily be convinced that way too many in the sports media today have bought into the words of Oscar Wilde when it comes to coverage of Tiger Woods:

“Moderation is a fatal thing. Nothing succeeds like excess.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

Irv Cross died yesterday at the age of 81.  After a career on the field in the NFL with the Eagles and Rams, Irv Cross became a studio anchor for CBS – the first Black man to be in that position.  He, along with Brent Musberger, Jimmy the Greek and Phyllis George created the concept of the modern NFL pregame show – – The NFL Today.

Rest in peace, Irv Cross.

Today, I want to delve into the world of money and NFL football; they do go hand in hand.  For the first aspect of this topic, I need to direct you to this very long piece on ESPN.com by Don Van Natta, Jr. and Seth Wickersham.  This is an example of investigative sports journalism that is well researched and very well written.  The headline here is:

• “Inside the dual legacies of NFL players’ union boss DeMaurice Smith”

Please take about 10 minutes with a cup of coffee – or tea if you prefer – to follow the link above to learn about some of the inner workings of the NFLPA over the last decade or so.  To induce you to take the time to read this, you will find a quote in there by Jerry Jones that almost makes sense in the context of the article even though you may wonder how that can possibly be the case.  Here is the quote:

“The owls are f**king the chickens.”

From this report, it is pretty clear that DeMaurice Smith has not been the firebrand/in-your-face/ take-no-prisoners sort of union leader that people like Marvin Miller or Walter Reuther or John L. Lewis were in the past.  The NFL and the NFLPA have had plenty of confrontations over the past couple of decades but none of them resulted in taking the game off the field and onto a picket line.  There are some folks in this article who believe that Smith and the union have given too much ground over the last decade or so and that they should have driven a harder bargain.  I would argue that will always be the case when a tense negotiation comes to an end.

Rather than look at DeMaurice Smith as a watered-down version of a union leader, I think he has done his part in growing the league – – and growing the league means growing the amount of money that flows through to the players in terms of salaries.  Yes, the split could be further leveraged toward the players but the salary cap until last year with COVID-19 had grown almost 50% in the last decade.  There are not a lot of jobs in the US where that is the case; the NFL players were doing well under the deals orchestrated by Smith and his staff.

From my reading, one of the largest inequities among NFL players is that they have within their ranks a great deal of income inequality.  Star players and QBs make tens of millions of dollars a year; lots more players make the league minimum which is about $600K for now.  Shed no tears for the grunts here; if they hang on in the league for 3 years – about the average for a random NFL player – they will have made $1.8M by the time they are in their mid-20s.  There are lots of folks in the US who would look at that financial situation and wish it had happened to them.

What Smith and the union seem to have done is to bargain in such a way to keep the show on TV because that is where the big bucks that support the salary cap come from.  That is the balancing act he has had to do in his head and on the fly as negotiations ebbed and flowed.  And while I agree that the last deal done by the NFL and the NFLPA extends for an inordinately long time – 10 years – I think that it provides exactly the environment necessary to “grow the game” thereby growing the salary cap.

And that brings me to the next point for this morning – – the negotiations now underway between the NFL and various media outlets for new broadcast rights deals.  Some reports say that the NFL is seeking to double the revenues from the networks and the streaming services in the next deal.  I have no idea if they will get that sort of increase, but two of the provisions of the latest CBA might entice the networks to cough up that kind of money:

• Labor peace for 9 more years = no fears about games being canceled or having to pretend that replacement players make for good television
• The flexibility/virtual certainty of adding a 17^th regular season game to the NFL schedule.

The NFL can portray to its “broadcast partners” that they will have the most popular TV programming in expanded form for the next 9 years without fear of a work-stoppage outside a stochastic event such as a new pandemic.  Moreover, for the right price of course, bidders other than the “Big 3” networks – CBS, FOX and NBC – might be added to the power rotation to televise the Super Bowl.

There are reports of these ongoing media rights negotiations which I take to be informative because the gist of the information appears in various places.  I do not know if they indicate a 100% increase in TV revenues for the NFL, but whatever the new revenue stream turns out to be, it will be significantly more than it has been up until now.

• Reports say that NBC has enjoyed a “sweetheart deal” for Sunday Night Football and that it will have to cough up a lot more to keep that franchise in the new deal.  NBC pays the NFL $950M per year for this programming.  NBC enjoys flex scheduling late in the year to give it meaningful games and it is in the Super Bowl rotation.  Compare that to the ESPN deal for Monday Night Football which is $2B per year without flex scheduling and no Super Bowl participation.
• Thursday Night Football is an interesting negotiation situation.  FOX has been partnered with NFL Network doing the games recently and paying $650M per year for those rights.  Thursday NFL games draw the smallest audiences and reports say that FOX wants out of that package.  There is no benefit to the league to put the games on NFL Network exclusively since the league owns the network and that is not how to leverage revenue increases.  However, reports say that Amazon is interested in that property for its streaming service.  Not only could that be a way to increase revenues for Thursday Night Football but adding Amazon to the mix for a full package of games introduces a new bidder – with deep pockets – to the equation for down the road.  On the other hand, would Amazon want to pony up big money for streaming rights if it had to share the games with NFL Network?  There is a lot to unravel here…

Before anyone points to the decline in ratings for NFL games last year and the Super Bowl audience drop of about 9%, please consider that 2020 is an anomalous year for television, sports and just about everything else in America.  Other sports leagues saw ratings for their championship events plummet last year; the NBA ratings for the Finals were down 49%.  I think it is important to look at longer term trends as well as to 2020 in this situation.

• Sunday Night Football has been the #1 prime time TV series for the last 10 years in a row.
• Football Night in America which leads into SNF has been the highest rated studio show for the last 15 years.
• In 2020, the top 5 TV shows of the year in terms of viewership were NFL games as were 7 of the top 10.
• In 2020, 30 of the top 100 TV shows in terms of viewership were NFL games.
• Eight NFL games drew larger audiences than did the most widely viewed Presidential debate.

That is why networks will pay more for these broadcast rights in the next set of deals and it is why the salary cap for players in the NFL will recover from the decline suffered in 2020 due to the loss of “live gate revenues” caused by COVID-19.  Some argue that DeMaurice Smith and the NFLPA should have gotten a “bigger portion” of the league revenues in exchange for that 17^th game which is unpopular with the players.  Maybe he could have and maybe he should have.  Nevertheless, the outcome here is that NFL salaries will continue to rise for the foreseeable future.  Now, if the NFLPA wants to tackle its internal problem of “income inequality”, that is an issue that only has tangential involvement with the NFL.  If that is a “problem to be solved”, it is one that more directly involves the NFLPA negotiating with player agents and NFLPA members themselves.

Finally, Dwight Perry of the Seattle Times had this item in his column last weekend:

“NFL owners are pushing to implement a 17-game schedule for this coming season.

“’A$ you might $u$pect, we have our rea$ons for playing $eventeen,’ said one.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

The Bible tells us that in the apocalyptic time:

“And ye shall hear of wars and rumors of wars: see that ye be not troubled…”  (Matthew 24:6)

The sports world seems to be in a time – – not nearly apocalyptic – – where it would be a good idea to think in terms of:

• “And ye shall hear of trades and rumors of trades; see that ye not be troubled.”

You cannot pick up a sports section or click onto a sports news website these days without hearing about rumored trades or trades that ought to be made or players wanting/demanding trades.  So, let me talk about a couple specific situations this morning…

The NBA trade deadline is about 4 weeks away; teams will decide if they are going to add or subtract from their starting lineups very soon.  That situation alone creates multiple scenarios for trade speculations.  For example, in the Eastern Conference, there are 9 teams within 3 games of one another straddling the cutoff line for the playoffs.  Some will decide to make a playoff push and others will not – – but at this point, there is no way to tell which team will be in which situation.  So, the rumor potential is exponentially increased.  See that ye are not troubled; I just want to look at five situations:

1. Several pieces have been written with the following thrust: The Pistons want to trade Blake Griffin, but no one seems to want him.  Griffin is only 31 years old; it only seems as though he and Fred Flintstone were teammates back in the day.  A report at CBSSports.com says that Griffin has played 626 minutes this season and has not  yet dunked.  He has had multiple knee surgeries and is averaging 12 points and 5 rebounds per game (in his 19 minutes per game).  And here is the kicker.  His contract calls for a salary in 2021 of $36.8M PLUS a player option for next year at $39M.  Yowza…!
2. Rumors of a Kyle Lowry trade have appeared in plenty of places.  At 18 points per game and 7 assists per game, he looks to be something a lot of teams would want.  Except … he is 35 years old and will be an unrestricted free agent at the end of this season.  Teams interested in acquiring him should probably have an eye on a deep playoff run this year.
3. Bleacher Report said that Kristaps Porzingis might be “available”.  On one hand a guy who is 7’3” and can reliably make 3-point shots represents a special talent.  On the other hand, with him parked out in the 3-point area much of the time, he spends about 30 minutes on the court per game and takes down only 2 offensive rebounds per game.  Really?  From a contract standpoint, he is signed through the end of the 2023/24 season.
4. Does your team need a 3-point shooter?  JJ Redick is still in the NBA (Pelicans this year) and he is on an expiring contract.
5. Does your team need a shot-blocker/rebounder?  JaVale McGee is still in the NBA (Cavaliers this year) and he is on an expiring contract too.

The rumors of trades regarding NFL QBs are rampant this year.  Certainly, the fact that 3 starting QBs from last year have already been traded to new teams for next year has fueled the speculation.  Added to that unusual degree of movement are “inside stories” that about a half-dozen other teams plan to release or move on from their starter in 2021.  As of this morning, the two QBs at the center of the rumor vortex are:

1. Deshaun Watson
2. Russell Wilson

The narrative is that both men are chagrined because their team has not sought sufficient input from them about the direction of the team and/or the personnel on the team and/or in the team’s front office.  Multiple reports say that Watson has told the team he will not play there again; a few reports say that Wilson “stormed out of a meeting” with the coaches prior to a game last year over the offensive game plan.  Let me assume for a minute that all the reports are accurate and that the players are indeed far beyond being miffed.

If the players want a trade and that is their supreme objective, it should be in the best interests of all sides to prevent this from becoming a latter-day version of the Gunfight at the OK Corral.  In a pitched battle where neither side chooses to blink, everyone is a loser; let me explain.

• Both QBs are under contract to their current teams and both contracts reportedly have a “no trade clause” in them.  Therefore, no trade is possible without the player’s side waiving that provision of the contract.
• Rumors say that Watson and Wilson both have “favored destinations” should they be traded.  Let me assume those reports are 100% accurate.
• That ”no trade clause” could be weaponized if the team side of this contretemps gets all pissy.  The gentlemanly way out of the clause is for the team to arrange a trade to a favored destination and then the clause is waived, and the trade goes through.  But suppose the team gets itself into high dudgeon and tells the player that either the clause is waived unconditionally, or the team will not entertain offers for his services.  See you in training camp…

All that sort of “in your face” exchange of views is detrimental to both sides.  If the player holds out, his contract tolls – – meaning it used to have three more years to run before free agency but now it has four.  Declarations of “never suiting up for those guys again” by the player reduces his trade value; while he may not care if his current team gets maximum value for him, he ought to care that the current team perceives that they are getting “sufficient value” for him or there may not be the trade he nominally wants.

The only thing missing from the reports about Watson and the Texans and about Wilson and the Seahawks is for one side to begin their “rebuttal” to the latest proclamation by saying, “Oh, yeah…?”  Elementary school playground arguments have proceeded in a more orderly fashion than these two have.

The one outcome of either confrontation that I believe is off the table is that either QB retires and goes off to “take their life in a different direction”.  Both have made enough money already to live comfortably for the rest of their lives, but both would also be leaving a ton of money on the table by retiring – the schoolyard equivalent of taking their ball and going home.

• Deshaun Watson earned $13.8M from 2017 to 2021.  When he signed his contract extension (through the end of the 2025 season) he got a signing bonus of $27M.  So, he has already banked just over $40M; what he would have to be sure of in any sort of “retirement scenario” is that the team would have little recourse to claw back that $27M signing bonus.
• However, the “retirement scenario” also leaves $146M on the table.  To put it bluntly, that is a lot of cheese.  Moreover, that humongous tail to the contract that exists today presents the Texans with a huge disincentive to make any sort of trade for Watson.  My calculation of the dead cap hit should the Texans trade him tomorrow is $66M.  Even if I am off by 10% – – which I doubt – – that would be about one-third of the estimated salary cap for the Texans in 2021.
• Russell Wilson has earned $90M from 2012 to 2021.  His current deal runs through the end of 2023 and he stands to earn another $70M in those remaining years.  His signing bonus for this deal was $65M so he would certainly not want to be exposed to a claw back there.
• There is little motivation for the Seahawks to entertain a trade for Wilson now.  Like Deshaun Watson, the Seahawks would take a massive dead cap hit should they trade him anywhere; my calculation is a dead cap hit of $58M.

It seems obvious to me that the best way to arrive at a resolution acceptable to both sides in both disputes – – note I did not say optimal for both sides, I said acceptable – – is for the two sides to cooperate and not aggravate the other side.  Of course, that behavior does not make for “Breaking News” or for an ”Insider Report” so there is a benefit to outsiders in keeping the level of rancor from going to zero.  Too bad…

Finally, perhaps the two sides in these two player/team disputes should heed the words of poet/playwright, Oscar Wilde:

“Always forgive your enemies – nothing annoys them so much.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………

 

 

Yesterday I pointed out two examples of cookie cutter coverage by the sports media in Spring Training stories and in coverage of golf through the prism of Tiger Woods.  There is another one to add today.  It has only been going on for a couple of weeks, but I think every aspect of the story has been covered – – except for the one that would resolve the issue.  I refer to the NBA All-Star Game.  Let me do a reset:

• The All-Star Game was not in the NBA schedule at the beginning of the season; there was to be a short break but no game or festivities.
• TV execs want the game; it draws ratings; they can sell ads.
• Adam Silver announced there would be a game in Atlanta; the NBPA concurred.
• The mayor of Atlanta asked people NOT come to her city to take part in the festivities and that public health restrictions on gatherings would be enforced.
• The players have griped and said they do not want to be part of the game.
• Adam Silver says, “The show must go on.”

Enough already…  Look, if the NBA stars think this is a bad idea, they have it in their power to make things right from their perspective.  Just do not show up for the game.  There is no need to talk about it; there is no need to issue statements; there is no need for any more debate.  To paraphrase Nancy Reagan:

• Just stay home.

The league and the union have agreed to stage this game – – but as the players always love to remind folks during CBA negotiations, there is no game without the players.  So, here is their chance to stand up for what they think is the right thing to do.  It might  damage their “brand” with their fans if they pull a no-show, but anything that is worthwhile comes at a cost.

• Memo to NBA All-Stars:  No need to paraphrase Nike here.  Just do it!

In the last NFL season, the NFC East was an embarrassment; in the upcoming MLB season, the NL East could be very interesting.

• Atlanta is loaded with excellent young players; I enjoy watching Ronald Acuna as much as any other player in MLB now.  Their “greybeard” would be Freddie Freeman who is all of 31 years old.  The Braves won the division last year and certainly will be part of that chase again this year.
• Miami shocked the world last year making the playoffs and then sweeping the Cubs in the wildcard round.  The Marlins’ pitching staff makes them a team to watch.
• The New York Mets have a new owner who is spending money.  The Mets’ acquisition of Francisco Lindor, Carlos Carrasco and James McCann should offset the fact that Noah Syndergaard will not be available until about July 4^th.
• Philly made a significant change in the front office hiring Dave Dombrowski who had been involved with pennant winning squads in the past.  Last year, the Phillies’ Achilles Heel was their bullpen; there have been changes made in the offseason; if the changes are for the better…
• Washington under-achieved last year finishing tied for last in the division.  The Nats have an excellent starting rotation and two excellent young players in Juan Soto and Trea Turner.  The Nats are hardly going to be an “easy out” this year.

I mentioned the major acquisitions by the Mets and the new owner there.  While the three acquisitions I cited there are important ones, I believe that two other teams made even more significant roster additions in this offseason:

1. St. Louis acquired Nolan Arenado from the Rockies PLUS they got the Rockies to pay part of Arenado’s salary in 2021 and 2022.  To get that sweet deal, the Cardinals gave up a young pitcher with a smattering of MLB experience (Austin Gomber) and gave up 4 other minor league prospects who have yet to progress beyond AA baseball.  A couple years ago, the Cardinals looked to the NL West and acquired Paul Goldschmidt to play first base; now they grab Arenado to play third base…
2. San Diego acquired a lot of pitching in this offseason signing/acquiring Yu Darvish, Joe Musgrove and Blake Snell.  Additionally, they signed the highly sought-after infielder from Korea, Ha-seong Kim.  It is not as if the Padres were bereft of talent before this winter; remember they still have Manny Machado and the newly signed Fernando Tatis Jr. (14-years and $350M).  And with all that, the Padres are a distant second choice according to oddsmakers to win the NL West.  As of this morning, the Dodgers are minus-200 to win the NL West while the Padres are +210.

Finally, since I referred to Nike and its ad slogan above, let me close with a statement from Phil Knight – the major domo at Nike:

“We wanted Nike to be the world’s best sports and fitness company. Once you say that, you have a focus. You don’t end up making wing tips or sponsoring the next Rolling Stones world tour.”

But don’t get me wrong, I love sports………