I will get three Thursday NFL games exactly right here on Friday morning when I get to the business of making my selections for the week. Naturally, I had those games perfectly scoped out on Wednesday night but just did not have the time to get the word out. Too bad…
Here are fifteen things from last week’s Mythical Picks; some are “on the mark” and some “missed by a mile”:
1. I said that Raiders’ fans might be looking forward to the time when Fred Biletnikoff (age 66) replaced Darrius Heyward-Bey in the lineup. Last week “DH-B” caught one pass for 7 yards. On the mark…
2. I liked Indy to win and cover at Baltimore. They did. On the mark…
3. I liked the Redskins with 11.5 points against the Cowboys. They lost by only 1 point. On the mark…
4. I took the Lions laying 3.5 points. They won but did not cover. Missed by a mile…
5. I liked SF/Green bay to go Over 42. The total was 54. On the mark…
6. I liked Buffalo/Jax to go Under 43. The total was 33. On the mark…
7. I liked Pittsburgh to win and cover 10 points at KC. KC won the game outright. Missed by a mile…
8. I took the Vikes to cover 11 points against the Seahawks. The Vikes won by 4 TDs. On the mark…
9. I liked the Giants to win and cover 7 points. They won by 3. Missed by a mile…
10. I liked the Saints to win and cover 11.5 points and for the game to go Over 50.5. The Saints won by 31 and the game went Under. One hit and one miss = Meh!
11. I liked the Cardinals to cover 9 points and the game to Under 47.5. They only won by 8 and the game did go Under. One hit and one miss = Meh!
12. I liked the Pats to win and cover 10.5 points and for the game to go Over 44.5. They did and it did too. On the mark…
13. I took the Raiders with 10 points against the Bengals. The Raiders won outright. On the mark…
14. I said that the team that made the last mistake would lose the game and I guessed that the Eagles would be that team so I took the Bears with 3 points. The Bears made the last mistake throwing an INT in the final minute or so and the Eagles won by 4. Missed by a mile…
15. I liked the Titans with 5 points. The Titans won outright. On the mark…
A mouthbreather might look at the results from last weekend and think that I have some kind of inside pipeline to critical information that one needs to know in order to make NFL wagering decisions. Trust me, I do not. In fact, one would have to be pretty dumb to use any information here to decide on which side to take on any NFL wagering proposition that involved real coin of the realm. Actually, anyone doing that would be dumb enough to take a scarf back to the store because it was too tight.
Comments:
On MNF last week, you may have heard Jon Gruden go off on one of his emotional ravings and let it pass. Because those ravings are what drive me nuts when he is on the air, I will not let it pass. Gruden was talking about the Houston Texans’ lack of success running the ball this year and said that they were 28th in the league in rushing. So far so good. Then he said that was “unheard of !!! ”.
Excuse me, Jon; take a deep breath here and engage your brain before you wag your tongue. This is anything but “unheard of”. Every year – without fail – some team in the NFL ranks 28th in rushing. This year it happens to be the Houston Texans. It is simply a fact; it is not something you need to get your skivvies in a knot over.
Even though Sunday’s Browns/Lions game had exactly zero importance to the 2009 season, it had to be the most entertaining game of the weekend finishing with an untimed play and no time on the clock because there was a defensive pass interference penalty in the end zone on a Hail Mary pass attempt. Brady Quinn threw 4 TDs in the game – 3 in the first quarter –getting the Browns off to a 24-3 lead in the first half. Going into that game Quinn had not thrown 4 TDs in his career. Matthew Stafford saw that performance and raised it one TD; he tossed five of them including one on that final untimed play to win the game. I received an e-mail from an avid Chicago Bears’ fan on Monday telling me that I needed to include this information in this edition of Mythical Picks. Here is the paragraph of interest:
“Matthew Stafford’s five touchdown passes yesterday puts him in exclusive company. The last rookie quarterback to accomplish that feat played for the Bears of course. It was that great Bears team of 1937 and the rookie quarterback was Ray Buivid.”
I have in fact Googled “Ray Buivid” to see that indeed, he was a person and indeed, he was a football player. I have made no attempt to ascertain if he did indeed throw 5 TDs in a game as a rookie or if anyone other than Messr. Buivid may have done so. If you want to track this down to confirm this factoid, have at it…
By the way, if anyone says that he/she had the Browns/Lions game going Over 74 last weekend, I definitely want a saliva test done…
Whilst Quinn and Stafford were piling up offensive stats, Jets’ rookie QB, Mark Sanchez, continued to find ways to underachieve his hype. Sanchez threw the ball 21 times on Sunday. The Jets’ receivers only caught 8 of those throws while Pats’ defenders caught 4 of them. Just to mix it up a bit and add to the fun, Sanchez found time to lose a fumble too.
The Redskins lost in Dallas to the Cowboys last week by a score of 7-6. To give you an idea how unproductive the Skins’ offense is this season, they have scored 35 points less than the Detroit Lions; only the Browns, Raiders and Rams have scored fewer points this season. According to an ESPN report, defensive backs’ coach, Jerry Gray, has accepted a job as the Head Coach at Memphis U next season. Memphis is a woe-begotten team that needs a lot of work to make it up to the respectable level. Having been with the Skins this year, Gray will bring some real on-the-job experience to that task.
Just when things were going well for the Bengals, they went out and signed free agent Larry Johnson. If you sleep with dogs, you’ll wake up with fleas… If you play with fire, you’ll get burnt…
I make no pretense that I am a theologian or Biblical authority of any kind. Nevertheless, I have read the Book of Daniel and the Book of Ezekiel and the Book of Revelation; I do not recall any reference there that would lead me to believe that these sure signs of the Apocalypse:
The Bengals have swept the Steelers and the Ravens this year - - and they have lost to the Raiders.
The Steelers lost to the Chiefs this year.
Dick Jauron was fired for underachieving yet Lovie Smith keeps his job.
The Cowboys lead the NFC East.
The Titans are dead last in the AFC South.
The Games:
(Thursday) Green Bay – 11 at Detroit (47.5): This game was ugly. The Lions did not come close to the offensive “powerhouse: they hinted they might be scoring 389 points against the Browns last week. In fact, their only score in the first 50 minutes of the game came when they recovered a fumbled kickoff return inside the Packers’ 20 yardline. The Packers won and covered easily - - as I foresaw with great clarity.
(Thursday) Oakland at Dallas – 14 (40): The Raiders reverted to form here. Even with Bruce Gradkowski at the helm, the Raiders’ offense was AWOL for most of the game. The defense played well for a while but when a team starts the second half with the same number of first downs as punts in the first half, the defense is not likely to hold up for 60 minutes. The Raiders’ defense did not. The Cowboys continue to sit atop the NFC East heading into the Cowboys traditional December Doldrums. The Cowboys won and covered easily - - as I foresaw with great clarity.
(Thursday) Giants – 6 at Denver (42.5): Both QBs here had ankle/foot injuries that slowed them down a bit. Both are slow enough to begin with, so I never did expect to see lots of QB scrambles for 30 yards in this game. I also did not expect to see the Broncos leading at halftime and pitching a shutout. The Giants’ loss here gives the Packers some breathing room in the wild card race and it gives impetus to the Eagles and the Falcons this Sunday to win their games as part of the wild card dynamics. The Broncos not only covered but won the game handily - - as I foresaw with great clarity.
Those games were yesterday and last night. For some reason, my crystal ball has turned cloudy regarding the rest of this weekend’s games - - all of which will happen in the future. Bummer…
Tampa Bay at Atlanta – 12 (46): Neither of these defensive units is a standout; the Falcons have the distinctly better offensive firepower. The Falcons are undefeated at home and the Bucs have not won a game on the road. (To be accurate, the Bucs have only won 1 game all season…) The Falcons trail three teams in the NFC wild card chase; the Giants lost on Thursday; the Packers won on Thursday and the Eagles are favored to win on Sunday. The Falcons need a win here but they will probably have to do it without Michael Turner who is a “game time decision” this week coming off a high ankle sprain suffered two weeks ago. I think the Falcons can pull this off at home. I’ll take the Falcons and lay a bundle of points.
Miami – 3 at Buffalo (40): This has been a mild autumn season in the northeastern US so far and that has to be pleasing to the Miami Dolphins who often have to come to that part of the world and play in weather that hasn’t happened in Miami since the last Ice Age. What worries me here is that the Dolphins have the Pats coming up in a week and they could be looking past the seemingly dead-in-the-water Bills this week. The Bills played the Jags very tough last week for their new/interim coach; will that effort/emotional jolt last into a second weekend? The new offensive focus seems to have been Terrell Owens; he caught 9 passes last weekend; if he only gets four passes coming his way all day this weekend, what is going to happen? The Dolphins are unexceptional on offense, yet they are the clearly better offensive team in this match up. The Bills defense is marginally the better unit here. Purely on a hunch, I’ll take this game to go Over.
Cleveland at Cincy – 13.5 (38.5): The Browns’ offense averages just about 100 yards per game less than the Bengals’ offense. That is a huge difference. In addition, the Browns’ defense allows 92 yards per game more than the Bengals’ defense allows. That too is a huge difference. I think the Browns did whatever offensive damage they are going to do this year in last week’s game - - and they still lost. The Bengals could have put a big distance between themselves and the Steelers/Ravens last week when both opponents lost - - except the Bengals gagged against the Raiders. They learned something there; that will not happen this week. I’ll take the Bengals to win and cover here.
Indy – 4 at Houston (48): The Colts dodged a bullet in Baltimore last week; the Texans dodged but still caught last week’s bullet right in the gut. To give you an idea how good the Texans’ offense is, they average only about 30 yards per game less than the Colts do - - and the Colts offense is gold plated. The defenses are well matched too in terms of yardage but somehow the Colts’ defense has found ways to yield 5 points a game less than the Texans’ defense. The Texans need this game desperately to stay in the wild card hunt; their division championship possibilities are nil. With less than a full measure of confidence, I’ll take the Texans with the points here simply because they need this game far more than do the Colts.
Carolina at Jets – 3.5 (41.5): Both teams are 4-6. Both teams are 2-3 at home and 2-3 on the road. Both teams have underachieved expectations. Carolina coach, John Fox, is probably in more danger of losing his job than is Jets’ coach, Rex Ryan, but I do not think that is going to be a difference maker here. Mark Sanchez is a rookie QB who showed flashes early this year and has stunk out the joint for the last month or so. Jake Delhomme has showed flashes in previous seasons but has stunk out the joint since last year’s playoff debacle where he threw 5 INTs. Why he has a newly minted contract extension with a pile of guaranteed money is one of the imponderable mysteries of the universe. If you like trends, the Panthers have covered in 4 of their last 6 games; the Jets have failed to cover in 6 of their last seven games. Tossing a coin, I will take the Panthers with the points here and hold my nose.
Washington at Philly – 9 (40.5): The Eagles are the model of consistency. This team is 6-4 straight up; they are also 6-4 against the spread; they are 3-2 at home; they are 3-2 on the road. The handicapping question is which Eagles’ team will come out of the tunnel onto the field each week - - the one that delivered a 3 TD “bruise” to the Giants or the one that lost outright to the Raiders while scoring only 9 points. The Redskins are also a model of consistency. Every week the Skins’ offense stinks and the defense plays well enough to keep the team in the game until the 4th quarter when the defense also goes soft and the outcome is determined. Oh, and the Redskins are 0-5 on the road this year too. If the “good Eagles’ team” hits the field on Sunday, they should cover this number comfortably; if the “bad Eagles’ team” hits the field on Sunday, they could lose the game outright. I am guessing that the Eagles will look at the results of the Giants’, Cowboys’ and Packers’ games on Thursday and use that to tip the scales toward the “good Eagles’ team” hitting the field. I’ll take the Eagles to win and cover here with a bit of apprehension. I also like the game Over.
Seattle – 3.5 at St. Louis (42): This game is such a dog that I would not be surprised to see Michael Vick show up and kill everyone involved in it. The Seahawks are 0-5 on the road; the Rams are 0-5 at home. Neither offense is any good; the Seahawks defense is marginally better than the Rams’ defense. Marc Bulger is out as the QB for the Rams with a broken bone in his leg. That puts Kyle Boller under center; if you want the definition of a guy who never lived up to his press clippings coming out of college, Kyle Boller is your guy. Reports say that Steven Jackson missed a practice this week with “back spasms”. If Jackson is out, this game might go off the board. Seattle shut out the Rams on opening day this year; they pitched another shutout against the Jags in October; other than that, they have given up points galore. The Rams defense held its own – relatively speaking – against the Saints and Cardinals in the past two weeks. On a venue call, I’ll take the Rams with the points - - assuming Steven Jackson is able to play.
KC at San Diego – 13.5 (42): Finally, the Chargers are asserting themselves as the best team in the AFC West. Surprisingly, the Chiefs have won two games in a row and three of their last four. They won last week’s game against the Steelers despite being outgained on the field by more than 200 yards in the game. That kind of disparity could obtain this week too and it is hard to imagine any team overcoming anything close to that twice in a season let alone two weeks in a row. It is a big spread to be sure; but the Chargers beat the Chiefs by 30 earlier in the year. I prefer the Chargers here. I’ll take the Chargers to win and cover. I also like this game Over.
Jax at SF – 3 (41): Jax needs this to stay in the hunt if not atop the wild card race in the AFC. SF needs this or their playoff aspirations will go the way of the passenger pigeon. Jax has the better offense when it comes to yards but the scoring stats show a strange difference. Jax is 6-4 but opponents have outscored them by 36 points. SF is 4-6 but have only been outscored by opponents by 2 points. I am going to count on the Jax defense to play well and contain the Niners’ running attack this week. I’ll take the game to go Under.
Chicago at Minnesota – 10/12.5 (47): Forget any game analysis here. This is purely a wagering opportunity. This is called a “middle”. There are two sportsbooks where the spread is as low as 10 and one sportsbook where the spread is as high as 12.5. That discrepancy offers the opportunity for a middle bet, which works as follows:
Take Chicago + 12.5 for 110 dollars - - AND ALSO
Take Minnesota – 10 for 110 dollars.
Three things can happen.
1. If the Vikes win by less than 10 or if the Bears win outright, you win the first bet and lose the second bet. You are out the vig, which is $10
2. If the Vikes win by more than 12.5, you lose the first bet and win the second bet. Again, you are out the vig, which is $10%.
3. If the Vikes win by 11 or 12 points, you are golden. In this case the game falls in the middle of the two bets (hence the name “middle”) and you win both bets. Your profit is $200.
Do the math for yourself, but you are getting 20-1 that the score will land in the middle. With two numbers to work with (11 and 12) and with a 10 point win by the Vikes being push, this is a wager to try. Imagine Vikes 28 Bears 17. Smiles all around…
Arizona at Tennessee – 1 (47): Oh my, the Titans are hot right now; they have won 4 in a row. So are the Cardinals; they have won 6 of their last 7. With Kurt Warner having “concussion-like symptoms” there is reason to wonder who will be the QB at the start of the game on Sunday and who will be the QB when it comes down to crunch time in the 4th quarter. Purely in football terms, I think Kurt Warner with slightly blurry vision is a better choice than a healthy Matt Leinart. From the standpoint of Warner’s future mental facilities, he should sit out if there is a danger of additive damage to his brain on Sunday. The Cards seemingly have the NFC West under control; they would be stupid to risk Warner sustaining a season ending injury if there were the slightest doubt about his readiness here. I like the way the Titans have gathered themselves and have not quit on the season; that was apparent on Monday night’s game against the Texans. I’ll take the Titans and lay the point.
(Sunday nite) Pittsburgh at Baltimore – 2 (42.5): This would have been the game of the week had it not been for the Pats/Saints on MNF. Here is another game where one of the QBs (Ben Roethlisberger) had to leave last week’s game with his bell rung. Can he play? Will he play? If he plays, will he finish the game? The problem for the Steelers is that backup QB, Charlie Batch is also out indefinitely with a bad wrist leaving Dennis Dixon in the back-up role. I wonder if the Steelers tried to contact Tommy Maddox or Jim Finks or Ted Marchibroda during the week… The Steelers/Ravens games have become wars of attrition and both of these teams need this game badly. I like this game to go Under.
New England at New Orleans – 3 (56): This is the best game of the week by just about any measure you would want to apply. The total line for this game says it all. The Saints are injured all over their secondary and all they have to do this week is play against Tom Brady, Randy Moss, Wes Welker and company. Meanwhile the Saints are the Energizer Bunny offense of the year; they keep scoring and scoring and … The “cross-stat calculation” - - the way that most opening total lines are set in Vegas - - yields an Over/Under line of 50 points. The fact that it is so much higher that that mark makes me think some folks know that some of the Saints’ front-line secondary players are not going to be out there on Monday night. The Pats have a real shot to win outright here so I’ll take them with the points here. I also think this game will go Over with plenty of time left to play.
But don’t get me wrong, I love sports…