Remember back to those days in high school when you took an exam for which you had not prepared nearly as much – or as well – as you should have. When the exams were graded and returned, you had a small sense of apprehension as you went to peek at your grade for the first time. Everyone has had that kind of feeling at least once in a while; that is precisely what I feel now as I go to Windows Explorer to open my NFL Pre-Season Analysis and Predictions from 9/1/08. I do not pretend to be able to remember everything I predicted then, but given the way the season unfolded, I know I am going to be way off in a boatload of the predictions. The grades here will not be pretty.
For those of you who might want to follow along with the “predictions” and this post mortem, here is the link to what I wrote in September 2008.
Here is my goal - - before I actually read any of those predictions. I would like my grades here to be such that I might have the requisite composite GPA to make it into an NCAA school under Prop 48 and play as a freshman. My SAT scores were high back when I took them in the Ordovician Period so all I need is a GPA of 1.6. My sense is that I am not a mortal lock to make it…
In terms of my “Coaches on the Hot Seat”, I did pretty well. I had Lane Kiffen and Mike Nolan on the list and neither made it to Thanksgiving in their job. I also had Mike Shanahan on the list; quite frankly, I do not think too many other crystal ball gazers had that one. I had Wade Phillips and Marvin Lewis on this list too; neither has been fired (I said Lewis would survive) but both have taken heavy criticism. John Fox’s Panthers played well this year so he was in no danger and Lovie Smith still has his job but is indeed still feeling heat in Chicago where one columnist routinely calls him “Lovie Kotite”. Obviously, I missed a few folks who are now job-hunting too. So, I’ll give myself a grade of C for the coaches on the hot seat.
AFC West:
I actually got the order of finish in this division perfect from top to bottom. However, I said it would take “a major upheaval and the intervention of the football gods to prevent the Chargers from winning this division.” Actually, it took a major collapse by the Denver Broncos - - which may have occurred via the intervention of the football gods - - to get the Chargers into first place.
I said the Chargers would win 12 games and win the division by 5 games. The Chargers won 8 games and won the division on a tiebreaker. Half-right.
I said the Broncos would finish second and win 7 games and I said that they needed to get a lot better on defense to succeed in 2008. The Broncos defense continued to stink; they won 8 games and finished second. Pretty good.
I said the Raiders would win 6 games and finish third in the AFC West. They won 5 games and finished third. Pretty good
I said the Chiefs would be a young team that would not do well in 2008 but would give a lot of young players experience playing at the NFL level. I said they would finish last with only 4 wins. They did finish last; they only had 2 wins; they did play a boatload of young players all season long. Pretty good.
I’ll give myself a B for this division having hit the superfecta on the order of finish and coming within one win for half of the teams.
AFC South:
I said that the Colts would not win the Super Bowl based on the historical fact that no team that played in the Hall of Fame Game has ever done that. I got that right… I did not get a whole lot more right with my predictions for this division.
I said that the Jaguars would win the division with 12 wins. I thought that their WRs would have to improve to make them strong enough to do that. What happened was that their WRs continued to slog their way forward toward mediocrity. Jerry Porter was one of the worst free agent signings of the entire 2007/08 off-season. The Jags finished last in the division and won only 5 games. Ugly!
I said the Colts would finish second in the division with 12 wins and that they would have the #1 AFC wild card slot in the playoffs. The Colts did finish second; the Colts won exactly 12 games; they were the #1 AFC wild card team in the playoffs. Pardon me while I bask in this glory for a moment; I do not expect to have too many opportunities to do that…
Okay, now I’m back from my basking.
I said the Titans would finish third in the division with 8 wins. The Titans finished with 13 wins and the best record in the AFC. Ugly!
I said the Texans would finish last in the division with 7 wins. They finished third in the division with 8 wins. Pretty good.
I’ll give myself a D+ for this division. The “+” comes from nailing the Colts prediction.
AFC North:
I would rather pretend that I never made any predictions about this division - - but I did. Clearly, I was suffering from clue deficit disorder when I made these predictions. In fact, I could not have found a clue during the clue mating season in the dead flat center of a herd of horny clues even if I had smeared myself with clue pheromones and did a clue-mating dance. I made three general remarks that are monumentally stupid in hindsight:
1. “The only thing I am confident about when analyzing the AFC North is that the Ravens are not going to win it.” [They missed by one game.]
2. “The other thing I am confident about is that there will not be a wild card coming out of this division…” [The Ravens were a wild card.]
3. “…the key game of the season for the AFC North will be in week 16 when the Bengals go north to play the Browns.” [That game was about as meaningful as a book on parenting written by Brittney Spears’ folks.]
I said that the Bengals would win the AFC North with 9 wins. OK, now that you have stopped laughing the reality is that the Bengals finished third with 4 wins and 1 tie. Ugly!
I said that the Cleveland Browns would be “in the mix” here and would finish second in the division with 8 wins. Stop laughing and pay attention! The Browns finished last, stunk out the division and won 4 games. Ugly!
I said the Steelers would finish third in the division with only 7 wins because the schedule was too hard for them to navigate. The Steelers won 12 games, got a bye in the playoffs and won the Super Bowl. Ugly!
I said the Ravens would “be able to see every other team in the division very clearly, because the Ravens will finish last.” I gave the Ravens 4 wins for the year; they actually won 11 games. Ugly!
Clearly, the grade for this division has to be an F. If the grading scale went all the way down to “J”, I might have earned a “J” here.
AFC East:
I said that it was fashionable to find reasons for the Pats to crash and burn this year but I was not buying into any of them. Of course, none of those “reasons” included Tom Brady playing less than a half of a football game for the season.
I said the Pats would win the division with 12 wins and make the playoffs. The Pats won 11 games but missed the playoffs on a series of tiebreakers. Tolerable prediction.
I said the Bills would make the playoffs as the second wild card team and win 9 games for the season. When the Bills started off 5-1, it seemed as if I had underestimated them. Then reality struck; the Bills won 7 games for the year and finished dead last in the division. Not good.
I said the Jets would finish third in the division with 8 wins. I said that they would rue the day they gave that big contract to first round pick Vernon Gholston and he did virtually nothing for the team all year. The Jets did finish third in the division and they won 9 games. Pretty good.
I said the Dolphins would finish last in the division with 5 wins. They finished first in the division with 11 wins. Actually, they only lost 5 games so I had their win/loss record as a mirror image of what it turned out to be. Ugly!
I’ll give myself a D for this division. The Dolphins prediction was awful…
NFC West:
I was onto something in my general commentary about the NFC West as a division but it was the right church and the wrong pew:
“Conventional wisdom is that the Seattle Seahawks will win this division comfortably - - simply because the other teams in the division are putrid. The problem with that conventional wisdom is that it isn’t very wise. The Seahawks will not be as good this year as they were last year and some of the teams here might actually be starting to show signs of awaking from the stupor they have been in recently - - or in the case of the Cardinals have been in for the last 25 years.”
Now if I had just followed along on that train of thought a bit further…
I said the Seahawks would eventually win the NFC West but would struggle to do so with 9 wins. I said, “…their days of dominance in the NFC West are coming to an end.” Well, their days of dominance in that division ended abruptly in 2008 when the Seahawks finished third in the division and won a grand total of 4 games. Ugly!
I said the Niners would finish second in the NFC West with 8 wins. I also said that having JT O’Sullivan at QB was not necessarily a good thing for the team and it did not exactly work out for them. The Niners did finish second and they won 7 games on the year. Pretty good prediction here.
I said the Cardinals “will disappoint all of the folks who have once again focused on them as the up and coming outsider that is ready to crash the ‘NFL Playoff Party’.” I had them finishing third in the division with 7 wins. They won 9 games; they won the division; they got on a roll in the playoffs and then lost in the Super Bowl. That prediction for the regular season is off the mark but not as far off as it might seem at first.
I said the Rams would finish last in the division and that they would also win 7 games – the same as the Cardinals. Yeah, right! The Rams came out of the gate stinking like a sumo wrestler at the 20-mile mark of a marathon race. Then they maintained that level of achievement right to the end and won a total of 2 games for the season. The Rams stunk and my prediction for them stunk even worse.
I’ll give myself a D- for this division. The Niners’ prediction is all that keeps if from being an “F”.
NFC North:
In the general commentary about this division, I did have something dead-on right:
“When Brett Favre left Green Bay, he left the NFC North bereft of quality quarterbacking - - and quality quarterback play is what often makes the difference between a good team and a bad team.”
I looked at the division through that prism and still got it badly wrong…
I had the Packers winning the NFC North with 9 wins. I thought the Packers defense could “carry the day”; in the end, the Packers’ defense couldn’t carry a tune. The Packers finished third in the division with 6 wins. Very bad!
I had the Vikings finishing second in the NFC North with 8 wins. I did say that the Vikes would need to have some kind of passing offense to avoid having to win all their games by a 16-13 score. The Vikes won the division with 10 wins and it was indeed their defense that made that all possible. Tolerable prediction.
I had the Lions [cough, cough] finishing third in the NFC North with 6 wins. Clearly, they finished last in the division with ZERO wins. The only prediction made in 2008 worse than this one was by some guy somewhere who obviously was smoking an illegal substance when he said he thought that Ralph Nader might carry more than one state in the Presidential election. Atrocious!
I had the Bears finishing last in the NFC North with 4 wins. The Bears finished second and won 9 games - - and I am still not sure how they did that. Ugly!
I’ll give myself an F for this division despite coming close on the Vikings. The other predictions were off by so far you would need astronomical units to describe the distance.
NFC South:
Here comes another ugly set of predictions, I just know it…
I had this part right:
“The good teams here should enjoy good seasons and put games in the win column regularly because they play the less than fully competent NFC North in intraconference play.”
However, I also said this:
“The NFC South has three solid teams and one that is about as enticing as a toxic waste dump.” [Unfortunately, the “toxic waste dump” referred to the Atlanta Falcons…]
I had the Bucs winning the division with 10 wins. The Bucs did win 9 games this year but that only got them third place in the division. Not good.
I had the Saints finishing second in the division with 9 wins and a wild card slot in the NFC playoffs if they beat the Panthers on the final weekend. I thought the Saints had improved their defense for 2008; it did not work out that way. The Saints finished dead last in the division even though my prediction was only off by one win; the Saints won 8 games. Not good.
I had the Panthers finishing third in the division with 9 wins and a wild card slot in the NFC playoffs if they beat the Saints on the final weekend. The Panthers won the division; they won 12 games; they earned a bye week in the NFC playoffs. Bad prediction.
I had the Falcons finishing last in the division with 2 wins. Here is some of what I said about them:
“The Atlanta Falcons will stink. The Falcons will probably start rookie QB, Matt Ryan for a lot of the games. Ryan may be a fine player some day - - but not this year. The offensive line is mediocre and RB, Michael Turner, will wonder why the holes he sees in Atlanta are so much more fleeting than the ones he saw in San Diego.”
The Falcons finished second in the division; they won 11 games; they made the NFC playoffs. Horrible prediction!
I’ll give myself an F for this division.
NFC East:
I said that the four teams here might be among the top six teams in the conference. That should give you an idea about how badly these predictions will turn out to be…
I had the Cowboys winning the division with 12 wins and the top slot in the NFC playoffs. To be fair, I did say they had “some disruptive players on the team (Pacman Jones) and some humongous egos” and that they “have no depth at WR or in the defensive secondary.” I also wrote:
“…if for any reason the locker room starts to get tense with all the egos there – including the omnipresent owner – the Cowboys could self-immolate. Wade Phillips seems like a nice man and has been a fine defensive coordinator over the years, but I am not sure he is the guy to put the toothpaste back in the tube if things head south with the Cowboys.”
“All of that” was right; nonetheless, I underestimated the potency of “all of that” and “all of that” led to the Cowboys finishing third in the division with 9 wins. Bad prediction. I had all the dots connected and still misinterpreted the picture.
I had the Giants finishing second in the division with 10 wins and gave them a wild card slot in the playoffs. I thought the losses of Michael Strahan and Osi Umanyoura would be too much for them to overcome to win the division. The Giants overcame those personnel losses, won the division with 12 wins, and had home field advantage in the NFC playoffs. Bad prediction.
I had the Eagles finishing third in the division with 8 wins. I said that the Eagles lacked – and needed – a deep threat in the passing game to get better and that DeSean Jackson might be the guy to provide that but there were questions about his dedication. Jackson had a fine season. The Eagles finished second in the division with 9 wins and 1 tie and made the playoffs as a wild card team. Not good.
I had the Redskins finishing last in the division with 8 wins. I also said:
“…the offensive line is aging and has had injury issues in each of the last three seasons. The local fanboys in DC still think Joe Bugel can conjure up a great offensive line out of guys who move pianos for a living. [Memo to Fanboys: He can’t.] If two OL starters go down or have to play at diminished capacity here, the Redskins’ season will be a long one. “
Not to dislocate my shoulder by patting myself on the back, but that is exactly what happened to the Redskins offense by mid-season and they limped home with a 2-6 record for the second half of the year. The Redskins did finish last and they did win 8 games. As the British might say about this prediction, “Spot on!”
I’ll give myself a C for this division.
Recapitulating, we have nine grades here – one for each of the divisions and one for “coaches on the hot seat”. The breakdown is:
A None
B One
C Two
D+ One
D One
D- One
F Three
Counting the D+, the D and the D- as three grades of “D” and using the four-point scale this comes out to a GPA of 1.33. That is pathetic; that does not qualify me for freshman eligibility by NCAA standards. Therefore, I will go off to remedial courses in prognostication before returning to embarrass myself once again - - uh, make next year’s predictions - - in August/September 2009.
However, just to show you that I do not intend to abandon the “prediction business”, let me make one for you right here and right now:
No fatties will finish in the top ten in either the men’s or women’s divisions of the Boston Marathon on 20 April 2009.
But don’t get me wrong, I love sports…