Unless and until Matt Walsh tells Roger Goodell that there are other people out there who also have illicit videotapes made by the New England Patriots of opponentsâ signals, Walshâs fifteen minutes of fame is up. We already knew that the Pats taped opponentsâ signals in the past. Given that Walshâs attorney has certified to the league that these are the only such tapes he has in his possession, there is nothing else that is interesting about Matt Walsh with regard to these matters. Because the bell is about to toll on his minor celebrity status, allow me to ask a couple of rhetorical questions that will probably only be answered in some book that he might write one of these days - - and in that case may only be answered in a self-serving and nuanced way:
1. When he left the employ of the New England Patriots, why did he take a half-dozen or so of these game tapes with him? Since he preserved them for about six years, it surely wasnât to have the medium available to him so he could tape over that stuff with late night movies.
2. If taking these tapes is the only thing he did that might â I said might â be considered âactionableâ in leaving the Patriots, why did he and his lawyer spend so much time and energy obtaining assurances/immunity from the NFL that he would not be culpable for anything?
Meanwhile, I have a less than rhetorical question for Roger Goodell that I wish someone would put to him when heâs in front of a microphone and camera next:
At the beginning of the 2007 season, you sent a letter/directive to each team spelling out the impropriety of taping opponentsâ signals. One might easily read it as a âcease and desist orderâ. Then in Game 1, the Jets caught the Pats making such a tape. Unless you had other complaints regarding this subject from teams about the Pats and/or other teams, can you explain why you took the time and effort to write that letter on that specific topic at that specific time?
Follow up question: If you say it was âroutine league businessâ, can you tell us three other random topics you have warned all the teams about in a similar time frame?
Sticking with the NFL for a moment, the Bears have released Adam Archuletta. In his final year with the Rams and in his short stint with the Redskins, it had to be clear to any offensive coordinator that Archuletta could not cover a fire hydrant. Evidently, the Bears figured that out too because he began the year as a starter but lost that starting spot midway through the 2007 season. The Redskins signed Archuletta to a contract that was the highest in the league for a safety at the time; then they traded him to the Bears for a 7th round draft pick; now he is an unrestricted free agent. If you look up âprecipitous declineâ in the dictionary Archulettaâs career path and the stock market crash of 1929 will be used as exemplars.
I want to give you the stat lines for the 2007/08 season for two âhypothetical playersâ in the NBA and then pose a question.
Player A: 28.3 points per game, 6.3 rebounds per game, 5.4 assists per game, 45.9% field goal average, 0.5 blocked shots per game, 1.8 steals per game.
Player B: 30.0 points per game, 7.9 rebounds per game, 7.2 assists per game, 48.4% field goal average, 1.1 blocks per game, 1.8 steals per game.
Since âPlayer Bâ is ahead in every statistical category here except steals per game where the two players are tied, one might conclude that âPlayer Bâ had a better year than âPlayer Aâ did. Nevertheless, the folks covering the NBA did not think so. âPlayer Aâ is Kobe Bryant â the leagueâs MVP. âPlayer Bâ is LeBron James.
When the BCS Commissioners met about two weeks ago and decided not to change the BCS system, that was hardly surprising. They have a cash cow on their hands and even though a playoff system might bring in even more cash, it would present stress to the bowl system and there was no need for them to choose to incur such stress. They met; they listened to a proposal for a âplus-1â system; they voted; nothing changed. Other than a bit of frustration, there was no story there; everything went as expected.
However, after the meeting, a story emerged due to the flapping gums of E. Gordon Gee, president of Ohio State University. In terms of high-sounding linguistic blather, this guy appears to be in training to replace Dr. Myles Brand when Dr. Brand finishes his stated mission of reining in all those rogue athletic programs out there. Said Gee about the âplus-1â playoff proposal:
“We will not cross that line and get onto the slippery slope: the professionalization of college football and a furthering of the arms race. We simply have to say no. If we don’t say no to this, the horse has left the barn totally. I will vote against it under any circumstance.â
That horse may have left the barn, but it sure left a lot of horse[bleep] behind. Even a university president whose contact with reality is normally years behind him or her has to recognize that college football is professionalized already. They added an extra game just a few years ago; they play conference championship games for the sole purpose of bring in additional revenue; they now involve 68 of the 121 Division 1-A schools in bowl games to bring in revenue. That, folks, is professionalization. Moreover, if E. Gordon Gee doesnât get that, then he is worse than a buffoon; he is a moronic buffoon.
Some have said that since the BCS runs college football â and not the NCAA directly â there is no way for the NCAA to implement a playoff because the BCS teams may refuse to participate. That might bring about an interesting power struggle. Suppose the NCAA said they would stage some kind of football tournament after the bowl games and/or in conjunction with the bowl games AND any team that refused to be in the football tournament would not be allowed in the NCAA basketball tournament either. More broadly, make it any conference that would not participate in the football tournamentâŚ
There are some schools â like Ohio State â that make a ton of money on the football program. Many schools do not make a ton of money there. Far more schools show a profit on college basketball than on football and most of the major football schools also have basketball programs that operate in the black. It might be an interesting showdown. However, it will never happen because all Dr. Myles Brand and E. Gordon Gee like to do is talk and posture. They are both a waste of space.
Finally, Dwight Perry had this observation in the Seattle Times regarding the football playoff debate:
âJust wondering
âHow can an 11-team conference that calls itself the Big Ten possibly be opposed to a âplus oneâ football playoff?â
But donât get me wrong, I love sportsâŚ